Screening Performance of Stroke Scale for Mid-Level Personnel (SML) in Detecting Acute Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion: A Cross-sectional Study.

IF 2 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22037/aaem.v13i1.2741
Dhanadol Rojanasarntikul, Aurauma Chutinet, Nichapa Lerthirunvibul, Sivapan Pechudom
{"title":"Screening Performance of Stroke Scale for Mid-Level Personnel (SML) in Detecting Acute Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Dhanadol Rojanasarntikul, Aurauma Chutinet, Nichapa Lerthirunvibul, Sivapan Pechudom","doi":"10.22037/aaem.v13i1.2741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The stroke scale for the mid-level personnel (SML) was designed for emergency medical services personnel to predict acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in both prehospital and in-hospital settings. This study aimed to validate and determine the appropriate cut point of the SML score in this regard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centered, prospective validation study to assess a novel LVO triage tool was performed in a tertiary care hospital in Bangkok. Patients presenting within 24 hours of onset of acute stroke were included in the study. The scale is designed for mid-level providers and emergency medical services (EMS) personnel including paramedics, emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and emergency department (ED) nurses. LVO was confirmed by brain and neck computed tomography angiography (CTA). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), likelihood ratios (LRs), and correctly classified instances (CCI) were calculated. Youden's index was used to determine an appropriate cut point of the SML score for LVO prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>200 cases with the median age of 64.0 (56.5-73.0) years were included (53.5% female). 83 (41.5%) cases were affiliated to the LVO and 117 (58.5%) to the non-LVO group. The median SML scores for non-LVO and LVO stroke patients were 3 (2 - 3) and 6 (5 - 7), respectively (p < 0.001). The most common presentations in both groups were facial palsy, arm weakness and speech impairment or dysarthria. There was significantly higher prevalence of neglect (8 (6.8%) vs. 5 (4.3%); p < 0.001) and eye deviation (39 (47%) vs. 29 (35%); p < 0.001) in the LVO stroke group than in the non-LVO group. LVO patients scored higher in all categories when compared to non-LVO cases. SML scores of 4 and 5 had the highest Youden's index of 0.82 and 0.67, respectively. SML score of 4 yielded the highest correctly classified instances (CCI) of 90% with sensitivity and specificity of 96.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 89.9-99.3%) and 85.3% (95% CI: 77.6-91.2), respectively. SML score of 4 also achieved the lowest negative LR of 0.04 and an odds ratio of 157 (95% CI: 46.7-521). The AUC of SML in cutoff point of 4 was 0.901 (95%CI: 0.853 - 0.949).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SML score may be helpful for mid-level medical providers and also EMS personnel in detecting LVOs since prehospital phase. According to the results, we recommend a cut point SML score ≥ 4 for enhanced sensitivity and NPV.</p>","PeriodicalId":8146,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"e74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12702507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v13i1.2741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The stroke scale for the mid-level personnel (SML) was designed for emergency medical services personnel to predict acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in both prehospital and in-hospital settings. This study aimed to validate and determine the appropriate cut point of the SML score in this regard.

Methods: This single-centered, prospective validation study to assess a novel LVO triage tool was performed in a tertiary care hospital in Bangkok. Patients presenting within 24 hours of onset of acute stroke were included in the study. The scale is designed for mid-level providers and emergency medical services (EMS) personnel including paramedics, emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and emergency department (ED) nurses. LVO was confirmed by brain and neck computed tomography angiography (CTA). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), likelihood ratios (LRs), and correctly classified instances (CCI) were calculated. Youden's index was used to determine an appropriate cut point of the SML score for LVO prediction.

Results: 200 cases with the median age of 64.0 (56.5-73.0) years were included (53.5% female). 83 (41.5%) cases were affiliated to the LVO and 117 (58.5%) to the non-LVO group. The median SML scores for non-LVO and LVO stroke patients were 3 (2 - 3) and 6 (5 - 7), respectively (p < 0.001). The most common presentations in both groups were facial palsy, arm weakness and speech impairment or dysarthria. There was significantly higher prevalence of neglect (8 (6.8%) vs. 5 (4.3%); p < 0.001) and eye deviation (39 (47%) vs. 29 (35%); p < 0.001) in the LVO stroke group than in the non-LVO group. LVO patients scored higher in all categories when compared to non-LVO cases. SML scores of 4 and 5 had the highest Youden's index of 0.82 and 0.67, respectively. SML score of 4 yielded the highest correctly classified instances (CCI) of 90% with sensitivity and specificity of 96.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 89.9-99.3%) and 85.3% (95% CI: 77.6-91.2), respectively. SML score of 4 also achieved the lowest negative LR of 0.04 and an odds ratio of 157 (95% CI: 46.7-521). The AUC of SML in cutoff point of 4 was 0.901 (95%CI: 0.853 - 0.949).

Conclusions: SML score may be helpful for mid-level medical providers and also EMS personnel in detecting LVOs since prehospital phase. According to the results, we recommend a cut point SML score ≥ 4 for enhanced sensitivity and NPV.

Abstract Image

中层人员脑卒中量表(SML)对急性脑卒中合并大血管闭塞的筛查效果:一项横断面研究。
简介:中级人员脑卒中量表(SML)是为急救医务人员在院前和院内预测大血管闭塞(LVO)引起的急性缺血性脑卒中而设计的。本研究旨在验证并确定SML评分在这方面的适当分界点。方法:在曼谷的一家三级医院进行了一项单中心前瞻性验证研究,以评估一种新的LVO分诊工具。在急性中风发作24小时内出现的患者被纳入研究。该量表是为中级医疗服务提供者和紧急医疗服务人员设计的,包括辅助医务人员、紧急医疗技术人员和急诊科护士。通过脑及颈部计算机断层血管造影(CTA)证实LVO。计算受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、似然比(LRs)和正确分类实例(CCI)。使用约登指数来确定用于LVO预测的SML分数的适当切点。结果:纳入病例200例,中位年龄64.0(56.5 ~ 73.0)岁,其中女性53.5%。LVO组83例(41.5%),非LVO组117例(58.5%)。非LVO和LVO卒中患者的中位SML评分分别为3(2 - 3)和6(5 - 7),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。两组患者中最常见的症状是面瘫、手臂无力、语言障碍或构音障碍。忽视的患病率明显更高(8人(6.8%)vs. 5人(4.3%);P < 0.001)和眼偏(39例(47%)vs. 29例(35%);p < 0.001)。与非LVO病例相比,LVO患者在所有类别中得分更高。SML得分4分和5分的约登指数最高,分别为0.82和0.67。SML评分为4时,最高的正确分类实例(CCI)为90%,灵敏度和特异性分别为96.4%(95%置信区间(CI): 87.9 -99.3%)和85.3% (95% CI: 77.6-91.2)。SML评分4也达到最低的负LR为0.04,优势比为157 (95% CI: 46.7-521)。SML在截断点4时的AUC为0.901 (95%CI: 0.853 ~ 0.949)。结论:SML评分对中级医务人员和EMS人员在院前阶段的LVOs检测有一定的帮助。根据结果,我们建议SML切点评分≥4,以提高灵敏度和NPV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书