SOA measurement of SiC MOSFETs using different voltage clamping techniques in DC SSCB

Power electronic devices and components Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.pedc.2025.100134
Imran Zulfiqar, Lin Liang, Zhongqi Guo, Fengming Yang, Xiangyu Wan
{"title":"SOA measurement of SiC MOSFETs using different voltage clamping techniques in DC SSCB","authors":"Imran Zulfiqar,&nbsp;Lin Liang,&nbsp;Zhongqi Guo,&nbsp;Fengming Yang,&nbsp;Xiangyu Wan","doi":"10.1016/j.pedc.2025.100134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>DC systems have received a lot of attention in recent years for their superior performance and reliability compared to AC systems, especially in applications such as DC microgrids, electric aircraft, battery protection, photovoltaics, and marine power distribution. DC semiconductor circuit breakers (DCCBs) using SiC MOSFETs are an ideal solution for these systems because they offer high input speeds. However, little is known about the performance and reliability of SiC MOSFET under DCCB conditions, especially the different voltage stabilization techniques. There are three main contributions of this article. First, evaluate the safe operating area (SOA) and characteristics of SiC MOSFET for DCCB applications, focusing on three voltage clamping methods: RCD, MOV, and a combination of both. Second, it provides a comprehensive quantifying investigation of the drain–source current <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. The RCD method can interrupt currents up to 5.25 times the rated current in single-pulse tests, while the MOV method supports up to 4.83 times, and the combined method up to 4.6 times. Third, in repetitive tests, the RCD, MOV, and combined methods sustained 1122, 2078, and 2842 interruptions, respectively, at 2.25 times the rated current. The total energy over the lifespan is 11.62MJ for the RCD, 21.52MJ for the MOV, and 29.44MJ for the hybrid RCD-MOV. Thermal failure was the primary cause of degradation. The findings emphasize the need for optimized voltage clamping strategies to improve the performance, reliability, and SOA of SiC MOSFETs in DCCB applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74483,"journal":{"name":"Power electronic devices and components","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Power electronic devices and components","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772370425000598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DC systems have received a lot of attention in recent years for their superior performance and reliability compared to AC systems, especially in applications such as DC microgrids, electric aircraft, battery protection, photovoltaics, and marine power distribution. DC semiconductor circuit breakers (DCCBs) using SiC MOSFETs are an ideal solution for these systems because they offer high input speeds. However, little is known about the performance and reliability of SiC MOSFET under DCCB conditions, especially the different voltage stabilization techniques. There are three main contributions of this article. First, evaluate the safe operating area (SOA) and characteristics of SiC MOSFET for DCCB applications, focusing on three voltage clamping methods: RCD, MOV, and a combination of both. Second, it provides a comprehensive quantifying investigation of the drain–source current Id. The RCD method can interrupt currents up to 5.25 times the rated current in single-pulse tests, while the MOV method supports up to 4.83 times, and the combined method up to 4.6 times. Third, in repetitive tests, the RCD, MOV, and combined methods sustained 1122, 2078, and 2842 interruptions, respectively, at 2.25 times the rated current. The total energy over the lifespan is 11.62MJ for the RCD, 21.52MJ for the MOV, and 29.44MJ for the hybrid RCD-MOV. Thermal failure was the primary cause of degradation. The findings emphasize the need for optimized voltage clamping strategies to improve the performance, reliability, and SOA of SiC MOSFETs in DCCB applications.

Abstract Image

在直流SSCB中使用不同箝位技术的SiC mosfet的SOA测量
近年来,与交流系统相比,直流系统因其优越的性能和可靠性而受到广泛关注,特别是在直流微电网、电动飞机、电池保护、光伏发电和船舶配电等应用中。使用SiC mosfet的直流半导体断路器(dccb)是这些系统的理想解决方案,因为它们提供高输入速度。然而,人们对SiC MOSFET在DCCB条件下的性能和可靠性知之甚少,特别是不同的稳压技术。本文有三个主要贡献。首先,评估用于DCCB应用的SiC MOSFET的安全工作区域(SOA)和特性,重点关注三种电压箝位方法:RCD, MOV以及两者的组合。其次,它提供了漏源电流Id的全面量化研究。RCD法在单脉冲测试中中断电流可达额定电流的5.25倍,MOV法可达4.83倍,组合法可达4.6倍。第三,在重复测试中,RCD、MOV和组合方法分别在额定电流的2.25倍下持续了1122次、2078次和2842次中断。RCD的寿命总能量为11.62MJ, MOV为21.52MJ,混合RCD-MOV为29.44MJ。热失效是退化的主要原因。研究结果强调了优化电压箝位策略的必要性,以提高DCCB应用中SiC mosfet的性能、可靠性和SOA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Power electronic devices and components
Power electronic devices and components Hardware and Architecture, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
80 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书