Psychoeducational group for acute psychiatric care. The Italian experience and suggestions for future needs.

IF 1.7
Franco Veltro, Gianmarco Latte, Umberto Serafini, Lilia Zappone, Antonella Gigantesco
{"title":"Psychoeducational group for acute psychiatric care. The Italian experience and suggestions for future needs.","authors":"Franco Veltro, Gianmarco Latte, Umberto Serafini, Lilia Zappone, Antonella Gigantesco","doi":"10.4415/ANN_25_04_02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The implementation of an innovative psychoeducational group intervention in Italian general hospital psychiatric units started in the years 2000-2001 in two Italian regions. The aim of this contribution is to describe the intervention method and the experience of its application, its spread, the results of evaluation studies and its evolution.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The methodology is qualitative/quantitative. The qualitative approach concerns the description of the prevalent clusters of topics in the most used intervention modules. The quantitative approach concerns the analysis of indicators used in the evaluation studies carried out since 2000-2001.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over time, three topics of the intervention have remained constant: \"What happened before the crisis\"; \"Stress-vulnerability-coping model\"; \"Psychotropic drugs: shared decisions\". Other topics have been introduced based on the patients' preferences: \"Psychophysical well-being\", \"Awareness\", \"Emotions-thoughts-behaviors connection\", \"Problem-solving\" and \"Stigma\". The intervention has been applied over time in 15% of Italian psychiatric wards with positive results (main result: decrease in readmissions and restraints).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Two main topics are discussed: a) the advantages and obstacles in applying the intervention; b) the need for addressing also the issues of substance dependence and antisocial personality.</p>","PeriodicalId":502090,"journal":{"name":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","volume":"61 4","pages":"239-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_25_04_02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The implementation of an innovative psychoeducational group intervention in Italian general hospital psychiatric units started in the years 2000-2001 in two Italian regions. The aim of this contribution is to describe the intervention method and the experience of its application, its spread, the results of evaluation studies and its evolution.

Method: The methodology is qualitative/quantitative. The qualitative approach concerns the description of the prevalent clusters of topics in the most used intervention modules. The quantitative approach concerns the analysis of indicators used in the evaluation studies carried out since 2000-2001.

Results: Over time, three topics of the intervention have remained constant: "What happened before the crisis"; "Stress-vulnerability-coping model"; "Psychotropic drugs: shared decisions". Other topics have been introduced based on the patients' preferences: "Psychophysical well-being", "Awareness", "Emotions-thoughts-behaviors connection", "Problem-solving" and "Stigma". The intervention has been applied over time in 15% of Italian psychiatric wards with positive results (main result: decrease in readmissions and restraints).

Discussion: Two main topics are discussed: a) the advantages and obstacles in applying the intervention; b) the need for addressing also the issues of substance dependence and antisocial personality.

急性精神病护理的心理教育小组。意大利的经验和对未来需求的建议。
引言:2000-2001年,意大利两个地区在意大利综合医院精神病科实施了创新的心理教育团体干预。这篇文章的目的是描述干预方法及其应用的经验、传播、评价研究的结果及其演变。方法:采用定性/定量方法。定性方法涉及在最常用的干预模块中流行的主题集群的描述。定量方法涉及对2000-2001年以来开展的评价研究中使用的指标进行分析。结果:随着时间的推移,干预的三个主题保持不变:“危机前发生了什么”;“Stress-vulnerability-coping模式”;精神药物:共同决定。根据患者的偏好,还引入了其他主题:“心理健康”、“意识”、“情绪-思想-行为联系”、“解决问题”和“耻辱”。随着时间的推移,该干预措施已在15%的意大利精神病病房实施,并取得了积极的结果(主要结果:再入院和限制人数减少)。讨论:主要讨论两个主题:a)应用干预的优势和障碍;B)解决物质依赖和反社会人格问题的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书