Lorenzo Mattioni, Francesco di Gregorio, Marco Badioli, Claudio Danti, Luigi A.E. Degni, Gianluca Finotti, Francesca Starita, Giuseppe di Pellegrino, Sara Garofalo
{"title":"Resting-State Theta/Beta Ratio Reveals Distinct Neural Signatures in High Sign-Tracking Individuals","authors":"Lorenzo Mattioni, Francesco di Gregorio, Marco Badioli, Claudio Danti, Luigi A.E. Degni, Gianluca Finotti, Francesca Starita, Giuseppe di Pellegrino, Sara Garofalo","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Individual differences in reward learning and motivational processes are reflected in sign-tracking behavior. This phenotype, characterized by heightened attraction to reward-associated cues, is linked to increased impulsivity, addiction vulnerability, and externalizing psychiatric disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To identify underlying neural differences, we tested whether high sign-tracking individuals exhibited an elevated mid-frontal theta/beta ratio, a resting electroencephalography (EEG) biomarker indicating reduced cortical control over subcortical motivational circuits. Sixty volunteers completed a 5-minute resting-state EEG session followed by a Pavlovian learning task. Participants were classified into high or low sign-tracking groups based on objective eye-gaze metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>High sign-tracking participants demonstrated a significantly higher mid-frontal theta/beta ratio compared with the low sign-tracking group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings identify the mid-frontal theta/beta ratio as a neural marker capable of distinguishing individual differences in reward cue reactivity. This suggests a pathway for targeted interventions aimed at the underlying cortical-subcortical dysregulation associated with sign-tracking and related vulnerabilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54231,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","volume":"11 10","pages":"Pages 1293-1298"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902225003891","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Individual differences in reward learning and motivational processes are reflected in sign-tracking behavior. This phenotype, characterized by heightened attraction to reward-associated cues, is linked to increased impulsivity, addiction vulnerability, and externalizing psychiatric disorders.
Methods
To identify underlying neural differences, we tested whether high sign-tracking individuals exhibited an elevated mid-frontal theta/beta ratio, a resting electroencephalography (EEG) biomarker indicating reduced cortical control over subcortical motivational circuits. Sixty volunteers completed a 5-minute resting-state EEG session followed by a Pavlovian learning task. Participants were classified into high or low sign-tracking groups based on objective eye-gaze metrics.
Results
High sign-tracking participants demonstrated a significantly higher mid-frontal theta/beta ratio compared with the low sign-tracking group.
Conclusions
These findings identify the mid-frontal theta/beta ratio as a neural marker capable of distinguishing individual differences in reward cue reactivity. This suggests a pathway for targeted interventions aimed at the underlying cortical-subcortical dysregulation associated with sign-tracking and related vulnerabilities.
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging is an official journal of the Society for Biological Psychiatry, whose purpose is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in fields that investigate the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders of thought, emotion, or behavior. In accord with this mission, this peer-reviewed, rapid-publication, international journal focuses on studies using the tools and constructs of cognitive neuroscience, including the full range of non-invasive neuroimaging and human extra- and intracranial physiological recording methodologies. It publishes both basic and clinical studies, including those that incorporate genetic data, pharmacological challenges, and computational modeling approaches. The journal publishes novel results of original research which represent an important new lead or significant impact on the field. Reviews and commentaries that focus on topics of current research and interest are also encouraged.