Comparative Evaluation of BI-RADS Classification, Clinical Management, and Diagnostic Performance in Breast Ultrasound Reports Using ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3
IF 2.5 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of BI-RADS Classification, Clinical Management, and Diagnostic Performance in Breast Ultrasound Reports Using ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3","authors":"Duygu Erkal , Mehmet Tonkaz , Tümay Bekci , Gökhan Tonkaz","doi":"10.1053/j.sult.2025.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to compare the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classifications, clinical management recommendations, and diagnostic performance of two artificial intelligence (AI) systems—ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3—with those of an experienced radiologist in interpreting breast ultrasound reports. The clinical inconsistency and referral safety of the AI systems were assessed. A total of 595 breast ultrasound reports were independently and blindly assessed by a radiologist and two AI systems—ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3. Observers provided BI-RADS categories and management recommendations based on the findings section. Diagnostic performance was assessed using histopathological diagnosis or ≥ 24-month follow-up as the standard. Clinical inconsistency means discordance between the BI-RADS categories and corresponding recommendations. Referral safety was quantified using a standardized referral safety score. Interobserver agreement was substantial for both BI-RADS classification (κ = 0.65) and management recommendations (κ = 0.79). The radiologist recorded the highest malignancy detection sensitivity (0.989), followed by DeepSeek-V3 (0.968) and ChatGPT (0.927). Specificity (0.735–0.753) and negative predictive values (0.981–0.997) were comparable across the models, while positive predictive values were limited (0.403–0.436). BI-RADS and management recommendations for ChatGPT were consistent, whereas DeepSeek-V3 had a 0.4% rate (p >.05). Referral safety scores were similar (ChatGPT: 0.44; DeepSeek-V3: 0.46). ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 demonstrated substantial consistency with expert interpretations and acceptable diagnostic performance in US breast evaluations. Although radiologists demonstrated the most accurate and balanced performance, these findings suggest that ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 may aid radiology decision support, pending further validation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49541,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ultrasound Ct and Mri","volume":"47 1","pages":"Pages 17-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ultrasound Ct and Mri","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887217125000629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classifications, clinical management recommendations, and diagnostic performance of two artificial intelligence (AI) systems—ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3—with those of an experienced radiologist in interpreting breast ultrasound reports. The clinical inconsistency and referral safety of the AI systems were assessed. A total of 595 breast ultrasound reports were independently and blindly assessed by a radiologist and two AI systems—ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3. Observers provided BI-RADS categories and management recommendations based on the findings section. Diagnostic performance was assessed using histopathological diagnosis or ≥ 24-month follow-up as the standard. Clinical inconsistency means discordance between the BI-RADS categories and corresponding recommendations. Referral safety was quantified using a standardized referral safety score. Interobserver agreement was substantial for both BI-RADS classification (κ = 0.65) and management recommendations (κ = 0.79). The radiologist recorded the highest malignancy detection sensitivity (0.989), followed by DeepSeek-V3 (0.968) and ChatGPT (0.927). Specificity (0.735–0.753) and negative predictive values (0.981–0.997) were comparable across the models, while positive predictive values were limited (0.403–0.436). BI-RADS and management recommendations for ChatGPT were consistent, whereas DeepSeek-V3 had a 0.4% rate (p >.05). Referral safety scores were similar (ChatGPT: 0.44; DeepSeek-V3: 0.46). ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 demonstrated substantial consistency with expert interpretations and acceptable diagnostic performance in US breast evaluations. Although radiologists demonstrated the most accurate and balanced performance, these findings suggest that ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 may aid radiology decision support, pending further validation.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI is directed to all physicians involved in the performance and interpretation of ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging procedures. It is a timely source for the publication of new concepts and research findings directly applicable to day-to-day clinical practice. The articles describe the performance of various procedures together with the authors'' approach to problems of interpretation.