What makes a birdbrain tick: Long-term memory drives expertise effects on working memory binding.

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Psychology and Aging Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI:10.1037/pag0000952
Vanessa M Loaiza, Kishen Senziani, Lea M Bartsch, Eda Mizrak
{"title":"What makes a birdbrain tick: Long-term memory drives expertise effects on working memory binding.","authors":"Vanessa M Loaiza, Kishen Senziani, Lea M Bartsch, Eda Mizrak","doi":"10.1037/pag0000952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Considerable research concerning the multidirectionality of cognitive aging indicates that retrieving factual knowledge from semantic long-term memory (LTM) remains stable in healthy older age despite declines in actively maintaining information in working memory (WM). This study addressed how older adults' extensive acquired knowledge may support WM by mitigating age deficits in the speed of establishing bindings in WM (Block 1) or through greater contributions from LTM (Block 2). Younger novices (<i>N</i> = 38; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 23.63, <i>SD</i> = 5.49), older novices (<i>N</i> = 56; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 69.55, <i>SD</i> = 5.48), and older experts (<i>N</i> = 26; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 66.96, <i>SD</i> = 5.41) in birding completed two blocks of a WM binding task that presented images of birds paired with words (e.g., robin-mudflat; pigeon-quick) for an immediate test of each bird (e.g., robin) with three options: the target (e.g., mudflat), a lure from the trial but not paired with that bird (e.g., quick), and a new-to-block distractor. Block 1 showed that older experts were just as slow as older novices when adapting the presentation rate of the pairs to achieve similar accuracy performance, regardless of the expertise-relevance of the stimuli (i.e., intact normal birds vs. scrambled meaningless birds). However, in Block 2, older experts exhibited an advantage to model parameter estimates of binding memory, but only when LTM was reliable (i.e., under no but not high proactive interference). Thus, rather than faster WM binding, expertise in healthy older age may confer benefits by outsourcing the demands of WM storage to LTM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":"361-374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000952","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considerable research concerning the multidirectionality of cognitive aging indicates that retrieving factual knowledge from semantic long-term memory (LTM) remains stable in healthy older age despite declines in actively maintaining information in working memory (WM). This study addressed how older adults' extensive acquired knowledge may support WM by mitigating age deficits in the speed of establishing bindings in WM (Block 1) or through greater contributions from LTM (Block 2). Younger novices (N = 38; Mage = 23.63, SD = 5.49), older novices (N = 56; Mage = 69.55, SD = 5.48), and older experts (N = 26; Mage = 66.96, SD = 5.41) in birding completed two blocks of a WM binding task that presented images of birds paired with words (e.g., robin-mudflat; pigeon-quick) for an immediate test of each bird (e.g., robin) with three options: the target (e.g., mudflat), a lure from the trial but not paired with that bird (e.g., quick), and a new-to-block distractor. Block 1 showed that older experts were just as slow as older novices when adapting the presentation rate of the pairs to achieve similar accuracy performance, regardless of the expertise-relevance of the stimuli (i.e., intact normal birds vs. scrambled meaningless birds). However, in Block 2, older experts exhibited an advantage to model parameter estimates of binding memory, but only when LTM was reliable (i.e., under no but not high proactive interference). Thus, rather than faster WM binding, expertise in healthy older age may confer benefits by outsourcing the demands of WM storage to LTM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

是什么让鸟的大脑滴答作响:长期记忆驱动专业知识对工作记忆绑定的影响。
大量关于认知衰老多向性的研究表明,健康老年人在工作记忆(WM)中主动保持信息的能力下降的同时,语义长期记忆(LTM)中事实性知识的提取仍然保持稳定。本研究探讨了老年人广泛获得的知识如何通过减轻年龄缺陷在WM中建立绑定的速度(Block 1)或通过LTM的更大贡献(Block 2)来支持WM。年轻新手(N = 38;法师= 23.63,SD = 5.49),老新手(N = 56;法师= 69.55,SD = 5.48),和老专家(N = 26;法师= 66.96,SD = 5.41)在观鸟完成两块WM绑定任务,提出了鸟类的图片搭配词(例如,robin-mudflat; pigeon-quick)立即测试每一只鸟(例如,罗宾)三个选择:目标(例如,泥滩),从试验但不搭配,吸引鸟类(如快速),和一个new-to-block错误选择。Block 1表明,在调整成对的呈现率以达到相似的准确性表现时,年长的专家和年长的新手一样慢,而不考虑刺激的专业相关性(即,完整的正常鸟类与无意义的鸟类)。然而,在Block 2中,年龄较大的专家在绑定记忆的模型参数估计方面表现出优势,但只有当LTM是可靠的(即,在没有但不是高度主动干扰的情况下)。因此,健康老年人的专业知识可能会通过将WM存储的需求外包给LTM而带来好处,而不是更快的WM绑定。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书