Loneliness in spinal cord injury: A systematic review and comparison with the general population.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2025.2593074
Louisa M C O'Donnell, Diana S Dorstyn, Linda Barclay
{"title":"Loneliness in spinal cord injury: A systematic review and comparison with the general population.","authors":"Louisa M C O'Donnell, Diana S Dorstyn, Linda Barclay","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2593074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The psychosocial consequences of a Spinal Cord Injury or Disorder (SCI/D) can include increased loneliness. However, differences in the measurement of loneliness confound the available evidence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare levels of loneliness between adults with a SCI/D and the general population (Touch Test data) using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (any version). A secondary aim was to explore potential subgroups vulnerable to loneliness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational studies examining loneliness in SCI/D were identified via CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science (up until 9th Sept 2025), Google Scholar (first 100 results), and targeted citation searching. Standardized mean group differences (Hedges' <i>g</i>) were pooled using random effects modelling and the methodological quality of included studies evaluated (QualSyst tool). Study characteristics and bivariate correlations of loneliness in SCI/D were additionally examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen observational studies (<i>N</i> = 3029 adults with SCI/D) were included in the analysis. Average UCLA scores (revised Version 3, 20-item and 3-item) for the pooled SCI/D sample and the general population were comparable, with both groups reporting moderate levels of loneliness (<i>g</i><sub>w</sub> = .01; CI: -.43 to .46, <i>P</i> = .951). Individual effect estimates among the SCI/D studies were, however, characterized by imprecision and heterogeneity. Associations between loneliness, demographic and SCI/D characteristics were inconsistent although those who were lonely did report adverse health and social outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The underlying personal, social and environmental factors which contribute to loneliness in SCI/D should be monitored and addressed. Ongoing research is also needed to develop a more culturally nuanced understanding of loneliness in disability. Protocol registration: https://osf.io/s6723/.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"916-926"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2593074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The psychosocial consequences of a Spinal Cord Injury or Disorder (SCI/D) can include increased loneliness. However, differences in the measurement of loneliness confound the available evidence.

Objectives: To compare levels of loneliness between adults with a SCI/D and the general population (Touch Test data) using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (any version). A secondary aim was to explore potential subgroups vulnerable to loneliness.

Methods: Observational studies examining loneliness in SCI/D were identified via CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science (up until 9th Sept 2025), Google Scholar (first 100 results), and targeted citation searching. Standardized mean group differences (Hedges' g) were pooled using random effects modelling and the methodological quality of included studies evaluated (QualSyst tool). Study characteristics and bivariate correlations of loneliness in SCI/D were additionally examined.

Results: Thirteen observational studies (N = 3029 adults with SCI/D) were included in the analysis. Average UCLA scores (revised Version 3, 20-item and 3-item) for the pooled SCI/D sample and the general population were comparable, with both groups reporting moderate levels of loneliness (gw = .01; CI: -.43 to .46, P = .951). Individual effect estimates among the SCI/D studies were, however, characterized by imprecision and heterogeneity. Associations between loneliness, demographic and SCI/D characteristics were inconsistent although those who were lonely did report adverse health and social outcomes.

Conclusions: The underlying personal, social and environmental factors which contribute to loneliness in SCI/D should be monitored and addressed. Ongoing research is also needed to develop a more culturally nuanced understanding of loneliness in disability. Protocol registration: https://osf.io/s6723/.

脊髓损伤中的孤独感:系统回顾和与一般人群的比较。
背景:脊髓损伤或脊髓障碍(SCI/D)的社会心理后果可能包括孤独感的增加。然而,测量孤独的差异混淆了现有的证据。目的:使用加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表(任何版本)比较SCI/D成人和一般人群的孤独感水平(触摸测试数据)。第二个目的是探索潜在的易受孤独影响的亚群体。方法:通过CINAHL、PubMed、PsycINFO、MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science(截止到2025年9月9日)、谷歌Scholar(前100个结果)和目标引文检索,确定SCI/D中孤独感的观察性研究。采用随机效应建模和纳入研究的方法学质量评估(QualSyst工具)汇总标准化平均组差(Hedges’g)。此外,我们还分析了SCI/D患者孤独感的研究特征和双变量相关性。结果:13项观察性研究(N = 3029例SCI/D成人)纳入分析。SCI/D合并样本和一般人群的平均UCLA分数(修订版本3、20项和3项)具有可比性,两组都报告了中等程度的孤独感(gw = 0.01; CI: - 0.43至。46, p = .951)。然而,SCI/D研究中的个体效应估计具有不精确和异质性的特点。孤独、人口统计学和SCI/D特征之间的关联并不一致,尽管那些孤独的人确实报告了不利的健康和社会结果。结论:导致SCI/D患者孤独感的潜在个人、社会和环境因素应予以监测和处理。还需要进行正在进行的研究,以对残疾人的孤独感进行更细致入微的文化理解。协议注册:https://osf.io/s6723/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书