Environmental and animal reservoirs of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a One Health challenge.

IF 11.6 2区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Isabela Náthaly Machado da Silva, Marcelino Bemvindo-Souza, Carlos Filipe Camilo-Cotrim, Igor Romeiro Dos Santos, Luciane Madureira de Almeida, Elisa Flávia Luiz Cardoso Bailão
{"title":"Environmental and animal reservoirs of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA): a One Health challenge.","authors":"Isabela Náthaly Machado da Silva, Marcelino Bemvindo-Souza, Carlos Filipe Camilo-Cotrim, Igor Romeiro Dos Santos, Luciane Madureira de Almeida, Elisa Flávia Luiz Cardoso Bailão","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2025.2600344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) is among the most prevalent nosocomial pathogens. However, in recent decades, infections were reported in communities, infecting individuals without previous hospitalization, and in livestock. Given this public health concern, this systematic review aimed to analyze studies that isolated MRSA from environmental and animal matrices, with an emphasis on the implications of this pathogen's presence from a One Health perspective. A total of 183 articles were selected between 2005 and 2025. These investigations were conducted in 43 countries, with 44% in Europe and 5% in North America. In South America, only studies from Brazil were identified, indicating a lack of data from other countries in the region. The animal matrix was the most extensively investigated source of MRSA, comprising 153 studies (85%) across a range of wild, domestic, and farm species. In the environmental context, MRSA was primarily identified in water (65.8%), followed by soil (21%), and air (13.2%). The predominance of MRSA isolation in the aquatic environment indicates that water is a critical reservoir for the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The MRSA isolates exhibited a multidrug resistance profile. Resistance was most frequent to tetracycline (11.51%) and erythromycin (11.51%), followed by clindamycin (9.04%) and penicillin (7.67%). Further, some studies have identified MRSA in foods of animal origin, representing a potential route of transmission to humans. Finally, this study indicates that the MRSA contamination cycle, which involves hospitals, the community, environment, and animals, is a growing One Health problem that necessitates a global multisectoral approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":49971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"329-357"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2025.2600344","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is among the most prevalent nosocomial pathogens. However, in recent decades, infections were reported in communities, infecting individuals without previous hospitalization, and in livestock. Given this public health concern, this systematic review aimed to analyze studies that isolated MRSA from environmental and animal matrices, with an emphasis on the implications of this pathogen's presence from a One Health perspective. A total of 183 articles were selected between 2005 and 2025. These investigations were conducted in 43 countries, with 44% in Europe and 5% in North America. In South America, only studies from Brazil were identified, indicating a lack of data from other countries in the region. The animal matrix was the most extensively investigated source of MRSA, comprising 153 studies (85%) across a range of wild, domestic, and farm species. In the environmental context, MRSA was primarily identified in water (65.8%), followed by soil (21%), and air (13.2%). The predominance of MRSA isolation in the aquatic environment indicates that water is a critical reservoir for the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The MRSA isolates exhibited a multidrug resistance profile. Resistance was most frequent to tetracycline (11.51%) and erythromycin (11.51%), followed by clindamycin (9.04%) and penicillin (7.67%). Further, some studies have identified MRSA in foods of animal origin, representing a potential route of transmission to humans. Finally, this study indicates that the MRSA contamination cycle, which involves hospitals, the community, environment, and animals, is a growing One Health problem that necessitates a global multisectoral approach.

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的环境和动物宿主:一个健康挑战。
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是最普遍的医院病原菌之一。然而,近几十年来,在社区和牲畜中报告了感染,感染了以前没有住院治疗的个体。考虑到这一公共卫生问题,本系统综述旨在分析从环境和动物基质中分离出MRSA的研究,并从一个健康的角度强调这种病原体存在的意义。2005年至2025年间,共有183篇文章入选。这些调查在43个国家进行,其中44%在欧洲,5%在北美。在南美洲,只确定了来自巴西的研究,这表明缺乏来自该区域其他国家的数据。动物基质是MRSA研究最广泛的来源,包括153项研究(85%),涉及野生、家养和农场物种。在环境方面,MRSA主要存在于水中(65.8%),其次是土壤(21%)和空气(13.2%)。MRSA在水生环境中分离的优势表明水是抗菌素耐药性(AMR)传播的关键水库。MRSA分离株表现出多药耐药特征。耐药率最高的是四环素(11.51%)和红霉素(11.51%),其次是克林霉素(9.04%)和青霉素(7.67%)。此外,一些研究已经在动物源性食品中发现了MRSA,这代表了传播给人类的潜在途径。最后,本研究表明,MRSA污染循环涉及医院、社区、环境和动物,是一个日益严重的“同一个健康”问题,需要采取全球多部门方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B - Critical Reviews" is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis, focusing on the critical examination of research in the areas of environmental exposure and population health. With an ISSN identifier of 1093-7404, this journal has established itself as a significant source of scholarly content in the field of toxicology and environmental health. Since its inception, the journal has published over 424 articles that have garnered 35,097 citations, reflecting its impact and relevance in the scientific community. Known for its comprehensive reviews, the journal also goes by the names "Critical Reviews" and "Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health, Part B, Critical Reviews." The journal's mission is to provide a platform for in-depth analysis and critical discussion of the latest findings in toxicology, environmental health, and related disciplines. By doing so, it contributes to the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the complex interactions between environmental factors and human health, aiding in the development of strategies to protect and improve public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书