Isabela Náthaly Machado da Silva, Marcelino Bemvindo-Souza, Carlos Filipe Camilo-Cotrim, Igor Romeiro Dos Santos, Luciane Madureira de Almeida, Elisa Flávia Luiz Cardoso Bailão
{"title":"Environmental and animal reservoirs of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA): a One Health challenge.","authors":"Isabela Náthaly Machado da Silva, Marcelino Bemvindo-Souza, Carlos Filipe Camilo-Cotrim, Igor Romeiro Dos Santos, Luciane Madureira de Almeida, Elisa Flávia Luiz Cardoso Bailão","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2025.2600344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) is among the most prevalent nosocomial pathogens. However, in recent decades, infections were reported in communities, infecting individuals without previous hospitalization, and in livestock. Given this public health concern, this systematic review aimed to analyze studies that isolated MRSA from environmental and animal matrices, with an emphasis on the implications of this pathogen's presence from a One Health perspective. A total of 183 articles were selected between 2005 and 2025. These investigations were conducted in 43 countries, with 44% in Europe and 5% in North America. In South America, only studies from Brazil were identified, indicating a lack of data from other countries in the region. The animal matrix was the most extensively investigated source of MRSA, comprising 153 studies (85%) across a range of wild, domestic, and farm species. In the environmental context, MRSA was primarily identified in water (65.8%), followed by soil (21%), and air (13.2%). The predominance of MRSA isolation in the aquatic environment indicates that water is a critical reservoir for the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The MRSA isolates exhibited a multidrug resistance profile. Resistance was most frequent to tetracycline (11.51%) and erythromycin (11.51%), followed by clindamycin (9.04%) and penicillin (7.67%). Further, some studies have identified MRSA in foods of animal origin, representing a potential route of transmission to humans. Finally, this study indicates that the MRSA contamination cycle, which involves hospitals, the community, environment, and animals, is a growing One Health problem that necessitates a global multisectoral approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":49971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"329-357"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2025.2600344","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is among the most prevalent nosocomial pathogens. However, in recent decades, infections were reported in communities, infecting individuals without previous hospitalization, and in livestock. Given this public health concern, this systematic review aimed to analyze studies that isolated MRSA from environmental and animal matrices, with an emphasis on the implications of this pathogen's presence from a One Health perspective. A total of 183 articles were selected between 2005 and 2025. These investigations were conducted in 43 countries, with 44% in Europe and 5% in North America. In South America, only studies from Brazil were identified, indicating a lack of data from other countries in the region. The animal matrix was the most extensively investigated source of MRSA, comprising 153 studies (85%) across a range of wild, domestic, and farm species. In the environmental context, MRSA was primarily identified in water (65.8%), followed by soil (21%), and air (13.2%). The predominance of MRSA isolation in the aquatic environment indicates that water is a critical reservoir for the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The MRSA isolates exhibited a multidrug resistance profile. Resistance was most frequent to tetracycline (11.51%) and erythromycin (11.51%), followed by clindamycin (9.04%) and penicillin (7.67%). Further, some studies have identified MRSA in foods of animal origin, representing a potential route of transmission to humans. Finally, this study indicates that the MRSA contamination cycle, which involves hospitals, the community, environment, and animals, is a growing One Health problem that necessitates a global multisectoral approach.
期刊介绍:
"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B - Critical Reviews" is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis, focusing on the critical examination of research in the areas of environmental exposure and population health. With an ISSN identifier of 1093-7404, this journal has established itself as a significant source of scholarly content in the field of toxicology and environmental health.
Since its inception, the journal has published over 424 articles that have garnered 35,097 citations, reflecting its impact and relevance in the scientific community. Known for its comprehensive reviews, the journal also goes by the names "Critical Reviews" and "Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health, Part B, Critical Reviews."
The journal's mission is to provide a platform for in-depth analysis and critical discussion of the latest findings in toxicology, environmental health, and related disciplines. By doing so, it contributes to the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the complex interactions between environmental factors and human health, aiding in the development of strategies to protect and improve public health.