Cognition and Quantitative Electroencephalogram (QEEG) Relations in Unipolar Depression: A Comprehensive Analysis.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Scandinavian journal of psychology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI:10.1111/sjop.70055
Elvan Ciftci
{"title":"Cognition and Quantitative Electroencephalogram (QEEG) Relations in Unipolar Depression: A Comprehensive Analysis.","authors":"Elvan Ciftci","doi":"10.1111/sjop.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated frontal quantitative electroencephalogram (QEEG) biomarkers of cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression (UD). Our primary aims were to: (1) find the difference between healthy controls and unipolar depression in NPA, (2) explore age/sex effects, (3) investigate how working memory interacts with other neurocognitive domains, (4) investigate the relationship between verbal fluency and cognitive performance in unipolar depression, and (5) characterize frontal QEEG-cognition relationships. We examined 71 UD patients (median age: 51; range: 38-67) who met DSM-5 criteria for unipolar depression via the Structured Clinical Interview for unipolar depressive disorder diagnoses (SCID-I) and 29 statistically similar sex-age healthy controls (median age: 45; range: 34-69) using neuropsychological assessments (NPA) and QEEG. Results revealed significant differences in almost all of the NPA domains in UD patients compared to healthy controls. Age negatively correlated with simple attention, working memory, and verbal delayed recognition, while positively correlating with verbal memory false recognition errors, suggesting older participants were more susceptible to memory errors. In the group of UD patients, women were older than men, and men had higher levels of education (p < 0.01). The females performed worse in working memory, facial recognition, simple attention, and complex attention (p < 0.05). Working memory was a central impairment, strongly connected to problems in verbal fluency and long-term memory. Frontal QEEG power bands (delta, theta, and beta) were significant biomarkers for domain-specific cognitive deficits in depression. These findings highlighted QEEG's potential for objectively assessing cognitive impairment in UD and personalizing interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21435,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":"676-685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.70055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated frontal quantitative electroencephalogram (QEEG) biomarkers of cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression (UD). Our primary aims were to: (1) find the difference between healthy controls and unipolar depression in NPA, (2) explore age/sex effects, (3) investigate how working memory interacts with other neurocognitive domains, (4) investigate the relationship between verbal fluency and cognitive performance in unipolar depression, and (5) characterize frontal QEEG-cognition relationships. We examined 71 UD patients (median age: 51; range: 38-67) who met DSM-5 criteria for unipolar depression via the Structured Clinical Interview for unipolar depressive disorder diagnoses (SCID-I) and 29 statistically similar sex-age healthy controls (median age: 45; range: 34-69) using neuropsychological assessments (NPA) and QEEG. Results revealed significant differences in almost all of the NPA domains in UD patients compared to healthy controls. Age negatively correlated with simple attention, working memory, and verbal delayed recognition, while positively correlating with verbal memory false recognition errors, suggesting older participants were more susceptible to memory errors. In the group of UD patients, women were older than men, and men had higher levels of education (p < 0.01). The females performed worse in working memory, facial recognition, simple attention, and complex attention (p < 0.05). Working memory was a central impairment, strongly connected to problems in verbal fluency and long-term memory. Frontal QEEG power bands (delta, theta, and beta) were significant biomarkers for domain-specific cognitive deficits in depression. These findings highlighted QEEG's potential for objectively assessing cognitive impairment in UD and personalizing interventions.

单极抑郁症认知与定量脑电图(QEEG)关系的综合分析
本研究探讨单极抑郁症(UD)认知功能障碍的额叶定量脑电图(QEEG)生物标志物。我们的主要目的是:(1)发现健康对照组和单极抑郁症在NPA方面的差异,(2)探索年龄/性别的影响,(3)研究工作记忆如何与其他神经认知领域相互作用,(4)研究单极抑郁症中语言流利度与认知表现之间的关系,(5)表征额叶定量脑电图与认知的关系。我们通过单极抑郁症诊断的结构化临床访谈(SCID-I)检查了71例符合DSM-5单极抑郁症标准的UD患者(中位年龄:51岁;范围:38-67岁)和29例统计上相似的性别年龄健康对照(中位年龄:45岁;范围:34-69岁),使用神经心理学评估(NPA)和QEEG。结果显示,与健康对照组相比,UD患者几乎所有的NPA结构域都存在显著差异。年龄与简单注意、工作记忆和言语延迟识别负相关,与言语记忆错误识别正相关,表明年龄较大的参与者更容易出现记忆错误。在UD患者组中,女性比男性年龄大,男性受教育程度更高(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of psychology
Scandinavian journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Published in association with the Nordic psychological associations, the Scandinavian Journal of Psychology publishes original papers from Scandinavia and elsewhere. Covering the whole range of psychology, with a particular focus on experimental psychology, the journal includes high-quality theoretical and methodological papers, empirical reports, reviews and ongoing commentaries.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology is organised into four standing subsections: - Cognition and Neurosciences - Development and Aging - Personality and Social Sciences - Health and Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书