RGB-Based Deep Learning for Freeze Damage Detection in Strawberry: Comparing Scratch and Transfer Learning Approaches on Custom Data.

IF 2.8 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Plant Direct Pub Date : 2025-12-11 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1002/pld3.70124
Nijhum Paul, G C Sunil, Amin Khan, Samriddha Das, Harlene Hatterman-Valenti, James V Anderson, Jinita Stapit Kandel, David Horvath, Xin Sun
{"title":"RGB-Based Deep Learning for Freeze Damage Detection in Strawberry: Comparing Scratch and Transfer Learning Approaches on Custom Data.","authors":"Nijhum Paul, G C Sunil, Amin Khan, Samriddha Das, Harlene Hatterman-Valenti, James V Anderson, Jinita Stapit Kandel, David Horvath, Xin Sun","doi":"10.1002/pld3.70124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Freeze damage presents a critical threat to agricultural productivity, resulting in substantial economic losses, especially in sensitive crops such as strawberries. Traditional methods for assessing freeze damage, including manual inspection, are time-consuming, subjective, and labor-intensive. In this study, a deep learning (DL) and computer vision-based approach was proposed to automate freeze damage classification in strawberry plants using RGB images. The performance of four convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures was evaluated: DenseNet-121, Inception V3, ResNet-50, and Xception. Two training methods are compared: transfer learning (TL) using pretrained ImageNet weights and training models from scratch. The models are assessed based on classification accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and inference time. The results indicate that models trained from scratch outperform TL models, achieving up to 97% accuracy with ResNet-50, whereas TL models attained a maximum accuracy of 84%. The ResNet-50 model also achieved the fastest inference time (3.0 s) while DenseNet-121 was the smallest (26. 86 MB). Furthermore, the models were most effective at identifying severely damaged plants but struggled to differentiate mild damage from minimal or no damage. The findings suggest that scratch-trained models deliver more accurate solutions for freeze damage classification in strawberry plants. Additionally, DenseNet-121 was the best choice for memory-limited applications, while ResNet-50 excelled in speed-sensitive tasks. This study underscores the potential of deep learning and computer vision to automate freeze damage assessment in strawberry plants, providing a more accurate, rapid, and nondestructive alternative to traditional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":20230,"journal":{"name":"Plant Direct","volume":"9 12","pages":"e70124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12696421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Direct","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.70124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Freeze damage presents a critical threat to agricultural productivity, resulting in substantial economic losses, especially in sensitive crops such as strawberries. Traditional methods for assessing freeze damage, including manual inspection, are time-consuming, subjective, and labor-intensive. In this study, a deep learning (DL) and computer vision-based approach was proposed to automate freeze damage classification in strawberry plants using RGB images. The performance of four convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures was evaluated: DenseNet-121, Inception V3, ResNet-50, and Xception. Two training methods are compared: transfer learning (TL) using pretrained ImageNet weights and training models from scratch. The models are assessed based on classification accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and inference time. The results indicate that models trained from scratch outperform TL models, achieving up to 97% accuracy with ResNet-50, whereas TL models attained a maximum accuracy of 84%. The ResNet-50 model also achieved the fastest inference time (3.0 s) while DenseNet-121 was the smallest (26. 86 MB). Furthermore, the models were most effective at identifying severely damaged plants but struggled to differentiate mild damage from minimal or no damage. The findings suggest that scratch-trained models deliver more accurate solutions for freeze damage classification in strawberry plants. Additionally, DenseNet-121 was the best choice for memory-limited applications, while ResNet-50 excelled in speed-sensitive tasks. This study underscores the potential of deep learning and computer vision to automate freeze damage assessment in strawberry plants, providing a more accurate, rapid, and nondestructive alternative to traditional methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于rgb的草莓冻伤检测深度学习:比较自定义数据上的划痕和迁移学习方法。
冻害对农业生产力构成严重威胁,造成重大经济损失,特别是对草莓等敏感作物。评估冻害的传统方法,包括人工检查,耗时,主观和劳动密集型。本研究提出了一种基于RGB图像的深度学习和计算机视觉的草莓植物冻害自动分类方法。评估了四种卷积神经网络(CNN)架构的性能:DenseNet-121、Inception V3、ResNet-50和Xception。比较了两种训练方法:使用预训练ImageNet权值的迁移学习(TL)和从头开始训练模型。这些模型是基于分类准确度、精度、召回率、f1分数和推理时间进行评估的。结果表明,从头开始训练的模型优于TL模型,在ResNet-50下达到了97%的准确率,而TL模型的最高准确率为84%。ResNet-50模型也获得了最快的推理时间(3.0 s),而DenseNet-121模型最短(26 s)。86 MB)。此外,这些模型在识别严重受损的植物方面最有效,但在区分轻度损害与最小损害或无损害方面却很困难。研究结果表明,划痕训练模型为草莓植物的冻害分类提供了更准确的解决方案。此外,DenseNet-121是内存有限的应用程序的最佳选择,而ResNet-50在速度敏感的任务中表现出色。这项研究强调了深度学习和计算机视觉在草莓植物冷冻损伤自动化评估方面的潜力,为传统方法提供了更准确、快速和无损的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Direct
Plant Direct Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
101
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Plant Direct is a monthly, sound science journal for the plant sciences that gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting work dealing with a variety of subjects. Topics include but are not limited to genetics, biochemistry, development, cell biology, biotic stress, abiotic stress, genomics, phenomics, bioinformatics, physiology, molecular biology, and evolution. A collaborative journal launched by the American Society of Plant Biologists, the Society for Experimental Biology and Wiley, Plant Direct publishes papers submitted directly to the journal as well as those referred from a select group of the societies’ journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书