Alena Lemeshova , Kaya A. Patel , Alexander J. Bloom, Lindsay Golan, Haney Haidari, Aiman Limbada, Cherish Zhao, Jennifer A. Honeycutt
{"title":"A systematic review of ketamine's anxiolytic potential in rodent behavioral models of anxiety and PTSD","authors":"Alena Lemeshova , Kaya A. Patel , Alexander J. Bloom, Lindsay Golan, Haney Haidari, Aiman Limbada, Cherish Zhao, Jennifer A. Honeycutt","doi":"10.1016/j.pbb.2025.174144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ketamine, a nonselective NMDA-receptor antagonist, is an emerging therapeutic for treatment-resistant depression and could also be a promising treatment for anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorders. However, preclinical studies in these areas lack methodological standardization, limiting clinical translatability. This review evaluates ketamine's anxiolytic potential in rodents by examining outcomes among different animal models, dosages, and treatment timing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods & Results</h3><div>A PubMed search of studies published up to July 21, 2025, identified 562 articles assessing ketamine's effects on anxiety and PTSD in rodent models. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 35 studies were analyzed. Key methodological variables, model type, dosage, and timing were summarized to assess consistency and effectiveness across studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Current research on ketamine's anxiolytic potential in rodents is limited by inconsistent methods and inadequate sex inclusion. Evidence suggests that administering 10 to 30 mg/kg intraperitoneally and waiting ≥24 h before behavioral testing procedures produces anxiolytic effects, in deficit models. Future studies should include female subjects and standardized designs to enhance clinical translatability and relevance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19893,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 174144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091305725001911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Ketamine, a nonselective NMDA-receptor antagonist, is an emerging therapeutic for treatment-resistant depression and could also be a promising treatment for anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorders. However, preclinical studies in these areas lack methodological standardization, limiting clinical translatability. This review evaluates ketamine's anxiolytic potential in rodents by examining outcomes among different animal models, dosages, and treatment timing.
Methods & Results
A PubMed search of studies published up to July 21, 2025, identified 562 articles assessing ketamine's effects on anxiety and PTSD in rodent models. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 35 studies were analyzed. Key methodological variables, model type, dosage, and timing were summarized to assess consistency and effectiveness across studies.
Conclusion
Current research on ketamine's anxiolytic potential in rodents is limited by inconsistent methods and inadequate sex inclusion. Evidence suggests that administering 10 to 30 mg/kg intraperitoneally and waiting ≥24 h before behavioral testing procedures produces anxiolytic effects, in deficit models. Future studies should include female subjects and standardized designs to enhance clinical translatability and relevance.
期刊介绍:
Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior publishes original reports in the areas of pharmacology and biochemistry in which the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. Contributions may involve clinical, preclinical, or basic research. Purely biochemical or toxicology studies will not be published. Papers describing the behavioral effects of novel drugs in models of psychiatric, neurological and cognitive disorders, and central pain must include a positive control unless the paper is on a disease where such a drug is not available yet. Papers focusing on physiological processes (e.g., peripheral pain mechanisms, body temperature regulation, seizure activity) are not accepted as we would like to retain the focus of Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior on behavior and its interaction with the biochemistry and neurochemistry of the central nervous system. Papers describing the effects of plant materials are generally not considered, unless the active ingredients are studied, the extraction method is well described, the doses tested are known, and clear and definite experimental evidence on the mechanism of action of the active ingredients is provided.