{"title":"Integrative machine learning approaches with genomic data for predicting antitubercular drug resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Rohan Shrivastava , Kashmi Sharma , Somesh Mishra , Poonam Parihar , Gobardhan Das , Khushhali Menaria Pandey , Anand Kumar Maurya , Vineet Kumar Sharma , Anamika Mishra , Sandeep Kushwaha , Rekha Khandia , Kuldeep Singh Yadav , Anvita Gupta Malhotra , Amit Agrawal , Jitendra Singh , Megha Katare Pandey","doi":"10.1016/j.jgar.2025.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading infectious cause of death, with drug-resistant TB threatening control gains worldwide Rapid, accurate prediction of resistance to first-line agents is essential to guide therapy.</div><div>The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms trained on genomic data for predicting phenotypic resistance to the antitubercular drugs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched 4 databases for original studies applying ML to whole-genome or targeted sequencing for resistance prediction against rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH), ethambutol (EMB), streptomycin (STM), and other routinely tested drugs. Random-effects meta-analyses (REML) pooled sensitivity and specificity; Area Under Curve (AUC) was meta-analysed after logit transformation. Publication bias was examined via funnel plots plus Egger’s and Begg’s tests with trim-and-fill adjustment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven eligible studies were included. Pooled performance was strongest for RIF and INH (RIF: sensitivity 0.90, specificity 0.95; INH: sensitivity 0.88, specificity 0.93). EMB and STM showed lower sensitivities despite reasonable AUCs. Forest plots for AUC (including logit scale), sensitivity, and specificity demonstrated drug-wise variation. Across studies, specificity (mean ≈ 0.92) exceeded sensitivity (mean ≈ 0.75). Bias diagnostics revealed marked funnel plot asymmetry; trim-and-fill imputation added 22, 29, and 23 studies for AUC, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively, yielding adjusted pooled estimates of ∼0.89 (AUC), 0.70 (sensitivity), and 0.93 (specificity).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ML models trained on genomic data demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy and robust discriminative ability for predicting first-line drug resistance—particularly for RIF and INH—although sensitivity remains variable across drugs and model types. Standardized external validation and calibration are needed before broad clinical deployment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","volume":"46 ","pages":"Pages 148-157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716525002681","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading infectious cause of death, with drug-resistant TB threatening control gains worldwide Rapid, accurate prediction of resistance to first-line agents is essential to guide therapy.
The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms trained on genomic data for predicting phenotypic resistance to the antitubercular drugs.
Methods
We searched 4 databases for original studies applying ML to whole-genome or targeted sequencing for resistance prediction against rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH), ethambutol (EMB), streptomycin (STM), and other routinely tested drugs. Random-effects meta-analyses (REML) pooled sensitivity and specificity; Area Under Curve (AUC) was meta-analysed after logit transformation. Publication bias was examined via funnel plots plus Egger’s and Begg’s tests with trim-and-fill adjustment.
Results
Seven eligible studies were included. Pooled performance was strongest for RIF and INH (RIF: sensitivity 0.90, specificity 0.95; INH: sensitivity 0.88, specificity 0.93). EMB and STM showed lower sensitivities despite reasonable AUCs. Forest plots for AUC (including logit scale), sensitivity, and specificity demonstrated drug-wise variation. Across studies, specificity (mean ≈ 0.92) exceeded sensitivity (mean ≈ 0.75). Bias diagnostics revealed marked funnel plot asymmetry; trim-and-fill imputation added 22, 29, and 23 studies for AUC, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively, yielding adjusted pooled estimates of ∼0.89 (AUC), 0.70 (sensitivity), and 0.93 (specificity).
Conclusions
ML models trained on genomic data demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy and robust discriminative ability for predicting first-line drug resistance—particularly for RIF and INH—although sensitivity remains variable across drugs and model types. Standardized external validation and calibration are needed before broad clinical deployment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (JGAR) is a quarterly online journal run by an international Editorial Board that focuses on the global spread of antibiotic-resistant microbes.
JGAR is a dedicated journal for all professionals working in research, health care, the environment and animal infection control, aiming to track the resistance threat worldwide and provides a single voice devoted to antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
Featuring peer-reviewed and up to date research articles, reviews, short notes and hot topics JGAR covers the key topics related to antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiparasitic resistance.