Temporal Trends and Short- and Long-Term Mortality of People With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nationwide Cohort Study

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Arthritis Care & Research Pub Date : 2026-06-29 Epub Date: 2026-03-07 DOI:10.1002/acr.70009
Megan Butler, Nicholas Weight, Muhammad Rashid, Rodrigo Bagur, Purvi Parwani, Samantha Hider, Edward Roddy, Robert Butler, Mamas A. Mamas
{"title":"Temporal Trends and Short- and Long-Term Mortality of People With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nationwide Cohort Study","authors":"Megan Butler,&nbsp;Nicholas Weight,&nbsp;Muhammad Rashid,&nbsp;Rodrigo Bagur,&nbsp;Purvi Parwani,&nbsp;Samantha Hider,&nbsp;Edward Roddy,&nbsp;Robert Butler,&nbsp;Mamas A. Mamas","doi":"10.1002/acr.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We investigated whether a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects the quality of inpatient acute myocardial infarction (AMI) care and long-term mortality post-AMI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed data from 784,091 adults, 6,047 with a diagnosis of RA, from England and Wales hospitalized with AMI between 2005 and 2019 from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project registry, linked with Office for National Statistics mortality data and hospital episode statistics. Cox regression models were used to compare risk of all-cause mortality at different time points according to the presence of RA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was no difference in adjusted 30-day mortality between groups (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99–1.19; <i>P</i> = 0.075). Beyond this, at 1 year (aHR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07–1.21), 5 years, (aHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.23–1.33), and to the end of the study period (aHR 1.31, 95% CI 1.26–1.36), the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with RA (all <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Risk of cardiovascular mortality was not significantly different at 30 days or 1 year (aHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00–1.17; <i>P</i> = 0.058), but it was at 5 years (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08–1.23; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and to the study endpoint post-AMI (aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.24; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We found no meaningful disparities in inpatient care according to the presence of RA; however, those with RA have elevated long-term all-cause mortality post-AMI. Our findings suggest that the mortality burden of RA post-AMI is not driven by the quality of AMI care during admission and is likely driven by the progressive nature of the comorbidities and the complications of treatments associated with RA.</p>\n \n <div>\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":"78 7","pages":"850-859"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acr.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.70009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We investigated whether a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects the quality of inpatient acute myocardial infarction (AMI) care and long-term mortality post-AMI.

Methods

We analyzed data from 784,091 adults, 6,047 with a diagnosis of RA, from England and Wales hospitalized with AMI between 2005 and 2019 from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project registry, linked with Office for National Statistics mortality data and hospital episode statistics. Cox regression models were used to compare risk of all-cause mortality at different time points according to the presence of RA.

Results

There was no difference in adjusted 30-day mortality between groups (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99–1.19; P = 0.075). Beyond this, at 1 year (aHR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07–1.21), 5 years, (aHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.23–1.33), and to the end of the study period (aHR 1.31, 95% CI 1.26–1.36), the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with RA (all P < 0.001). Risk of cardiovascular mortality was not significantly different at 30 days or 1 year (aHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00–1.17; P = 0.058), but it was at 5 years (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08–1.23; P < 0.001) and to the study endpoint post-AMI (aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.24; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

We found no meaningful disparities in inpatient care according to the presence of RA; however, those with RA have elevated long-term all-cause mortality post-AMI. Our findings suggest that the mortality burden of RA post-AMI is not driven by the quality of AMI care during admission and is likely driven by the progressive nature of the comorbidities and the complications of treatments associated with RA.

Abstract Image

急性心肌梗死和类风湿关节炎患者的时间趋势和短期和长期死亡率:一项全国性队列研究。
目的:我们研究类风湿关节炎(RA)的诊断是否会影响急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院患者的护理质量和AMI后的长期死亡率。方法:我们分析了2005年至2019年期间来自英格兰和威尔士因AMI住院的784091名成年人(6047名诊断为RA)的数据,这些数据来自MINAP登记,并与ONS死亡率数据和医院事件统计数据相关联。采用Cox回归模型比较不同时间点的全因死亡率风险。结果:两组间校正30天死亡率无差异(校正危险比(aHR): 1.09, 95% CI 0.99-1.19, P=0.075)。除此之外,在1年(aHR: 1.14, 95% CI 1.97 -1.21)、5年(aHR: 1.28, 95% CI 1.23-1.33)和研究期结束时(aHR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.26-1.36), RA患者的全因死亡率风险明显更高(均为p)。结论:我们发现,根据RA的存在,住院治疗没有显著差异,然而,RA患者ami后的长期全因死亡率升高。我们的研究结果表明,AMI后RA的死亡率负担不是由入院时AMI护理的质量驱动的,而可能是由合并症的进行性和RA相关治疗的并发症驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书