Trust learning in the repeated trust game: A meta-analytic study

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
British journal of psychology Pub Date : 2026-07-10 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI:10.1111/bjop.70045
Caitlin Duncan, Lorena Sganzerla, Laura Kaltwasser, Isabel Dziobek
{"title":"Trust learning in the repeated trust game: A meta-analytic study","authors":"Caitlin Duncan,&nbsp;Lorena Sganzerla,&nbsp;Laura Kaltwasser,&nbsp;Isabel Dziobek","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Trust involves making oneself vulnerable by relying on the expectation that others will reciprocate and act in a trustworthy manner, leading to mutual benefit. In behavioural economics and psychology, the Trust Game (TG) is a widely used paradigm to measure trust. The repeated TG is a modified version of the TG in which participants encounter the same partner(s) multiple times, allowing for reputation and trust learning. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to identify features of the repeated TG, participant characteristics, and manipulations of partner trustworthiness that affect trust learning. This is the first meta-analytic study to specifically assess trust learning in the repeated TG and included 404 effect sizes from over 8000 participants from 68 studies. Our findings indicate that the partners' behavioural trustworthiness, in the form of their reciprocation rate, is by far the most influential factor in participant trust learning (β = 3.0). Furthermore, the results reveal that manipulating prior information about partners can have an effect on the amount of learning, but only for manipulations of trustworthiness/morality. Notably, in ingroup–outgroup studies, participants learn from their partners' trustworthiness and it is <i>not</i> affected by their partners' group membership.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":"117 3","pages":"1026-1055"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjop.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjop.70045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trust involves making oneself vulnerable by relying on the expectation that others will reciprocate and act in a trustworthy manner, leading to mutual benefit. In behavioural economics and psychology, the Trust Game (TG) is a widely used paradigm to measure trust. The repeated TG is a modified version of the TG in which participants encounter the same partner(s) multiple times, allowing for reputation and trust learning. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to identify features of the repeated TG, participant characteristics, and manipulations of partner trustworthiness that affect trust learning. This is the first meta-analytic study to specifically assess trust learning in the repeated TG and included 404 effect sizes from over 8000 participants from 68 studies. Our findings indicate that the partners' behavioural trustworthiness, in the form of their reciprocation rate, is by far the most influential factor in participant trust learning (β = 3.0). Furthermore, the results reveal that manipulating prior information about partners can have an effect on the amount of learning, but only for manipulations of trustworthiness/morality. Notably, in ingroup–outgroup studies, participants learn from their partners' trustworthiness and it is not affected by their partners' group membership.

Abstract Image

重复信任游戏中的信任学习:元分析研究。
信任包括通过期望他人会以值得信赖的方式回报并采取行动,从而使自己变得脆弱,从而实现互惠互利。在行为经济学和心理学中,信任博弈(TG)是一种被广泛使用的衡量信任的范式。重复TG是TG的修改版本,参与者多次遇到相同的伙伴,允许声誉和信任学习。本荟萃分析的目的是确定重复TG的特征,参与者的特征,以及对伙伴可信度的操纵影响信任学习。这是第一个专门评估重复TG中信任学习的荟萃分析研究,包括来自68项研究的8000多名参与者的404个效应值。我们的研究结果表明,合作伙伴的行为可信度,以他们的回报率的形式,是迄今为止对参与者信任学习影响最大的因素(β = 3.0)。此外,研究结果还表明,操纵合作伙伴的先验信息对学习量有影响,但仅对可信度/道德的操纵有影响。值得注意的是,在群内群外研究中,参与者从伴侣的可信度中学习,而不受其伴侣的群体成员身份的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British journal of psychology
British journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychology publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognition; health and clinical psychology; developmental, social and occupational psychology. For information on specific requirements, please view Notes for Contributors. We attract a large number of international submissions each year which make major contributions across the range of psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书