Matthew Dimond, Talar W Markossian, Beatrice D Probst, Katherine Habicht, Holly J Kramer
{"title":"Clinician Fidelity with Hypertension Quality Improvement Program is Associated with Blood Pressure Control within a Clinician-Patient Panel.","authors":"Matthew Dimond, Talar W Markossian, Beatrice D Probst, Katherine Habicht, Holly J Kramer","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences in clinician fidelity with hypertension quality improvement (QI) interventions may influence blood pressure (BP) control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis included data from 35,115 patients with 89,230 clinical encounters during a calendar year conducted by 87 physicians, 7 advanced practice nurses, and 173 residents to examine the association of fidelity measures with QI interventions and BP control for a clinician-patient panel. BP control (BP < 140/90 mm Hg) was based on vital signs at last clinic visit. The QI program fidelity measures included (1) documented automated office BP (AOBP) to confirm initial elevated BP, (2) 30-day follow-up visits when clinic BP is uncontrolled, (3) appropriate escalation of medications during visits with uncontrolled BP, and (4) use of combination BP-lowering medications. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the association of QI program fidelity measure quartiles with patient panel BP control, while adjusting for patient panel characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 63.2 years (SD 12.8), 45.1% were men; race/ethnicity was Non-Hispanic (NH) White in 60.5%, NH Black in 20.3%, and Hispanic in 14.0%. Average patient panel BP control rate was 69.1%. After adjustment, the highest AOBP and 30-day follow-up visit quartiles were associated with a 15.1% (95% CI, 8.9%-21.4%) and 12.3% (95% CI, 6.8%-17.7%) higher percentage of clinician-patient panels with controlled BP compared to the lowest quartile. No association was noted with other fidelity measures and BP control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increasing fidelity with hypertension QI interventions may help clinicians improve BP control rates within their patient panel.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"820-828"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13189694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Differences in clinician fidelity with hypertension quality improvement (QI) interventions may influence blood pressure (BP) control.
Methods: This analysis included data from 35,115 patients with 89,230 clinical encounters during a calendar year conducted by 87 physicians, 7 advanced practice nurses, and 173 residents to examine the association of fidelity measures with QI interventions and BP control for a clinician-patient panel. BP control (BP < 140/90 mm Hg) was based on vital signs at last clinic visit. The QI program fidelity measures included (1) documented automated office BP (AOBP) to confirm initial elevated BP, (2) 30-day follow-up visits when clinic BP is uncontrolled, (3) appropriate escalation of medications during visits with uncontrolled BP, and (4) use of combination BP-lowering medications. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the association of QI program fidelity measure quartiles with patient panel BP control, while adjusting for patient panel characteristics.
Results: The mean patient age was 63.2 years (SD 12.8), 45.1% were men; race/ethnicity was Non-Hispanic (NH) White in 60.5%, NH Black in 20.3%, and Hispanic in 14.0%. Average patient panel BP control rate was 69.1%. After adjustment, the highest AOBP and 30-day follow-up visit quartiles were associated with a 15.1% (95% CI, 8.9%-21.4%) and 12.3% (95% CI, 6.8%-17.7%) higher percentage of clinician-patient panels with controlled BP compared to the lowest quartile. No association was noted with other fidelity measures and BP control.
Conclusion: Increasing fidelity with hypertension QI interventions may help clinicians improve BP control rates within their patient panel.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.