Clinician Fidelity with Hypertension Quality Improvement Program is Associated with Blood Pressure Control within a Clinician-Patient Panel.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Matthew Dimond, Talar W Markossian, Beatrice D Probst, Katherine Habicht, Holly J Kramer
{"title":"Clinician Fidelity with Hypertension Quality Improvement Program is Associated with Blood Pressure Control within a Clinician-Patient Panel.","authors":"Matthew Dimond, Talar W Markossian, Beatrice D Probst, Katherine Habicht, Holly J Kramer","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences in clinician fidelity with hypertension quality improvement (QI) interventions may influence blood pressure (BP) control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis included data from 35,115 patients with 89,230 clinical encounters during a calendar year conducted by 87 physicians, 7 advanced practice nurses, and 173 residents to examine the association of fidelity measures with QI interventions and BP control for a clinician-patient panel. BP control (BP < 140/90 mm Hg) was based on vital signs at last clinic visit. The QI program fidelity measures included (1) documented automated office BP (AOBP) to confirm initial elevated BP, (2) 30-day follow-up visits when clinic BP is uncontrolled, (3) appropriate escalation of medications during visits with uncontrolled BP, and (4) use of combination BP-lowering medications. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the association of QI program fidelity measure quartiles with patient panel BP control, while adjusting for patient panel characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 63.2 years (SD 12.8), 45.1% were men; race/ethnicity was Non-Hispanic (NH) White in 60.5%, NH Black in 20.3%, and Hispanic in 14.0%. Average patient panel BP control rate was 69.1%. After adjustment, the highest AOBP and 30-day follow-up visit quartiles were associated with a 15.1% (95% CI, 8.9%-21.4%) and 12.3% (95% CI, 6.8%-17.7%) higher percentage of clinician-patient panels with controlled BP compared to the lowest quartile. No association was noted with other fidelity measures and BP control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increasing fidelity with hypertension QI interventions may help clinicians improve BP control rates within their patient panel.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"820-828"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13189694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Differences in clinician fidelity with hypertension quality improvement (QI) interventions may influence blood pressure (BP) control.

Methods: This analysis included data from 35,115 patients with 89,230 clinical encounters during a calendar year conducted by 87 physicians, 7 advanced practice nurses, and 173 residents to examine the association of fidelity measures with QI interventions and BP control for a clinician-patient panel. BP control (BP < 140/90 mm Hg) was based on vital signs at last clinic visit. The QI program fidelity measures included (1) documented automated office BP (AOBP) to confirm initial elevated BP, (2) 30-day follow-up visits when clinic BP is uncontrolled, (3) appropriate escalation of medications during visits with uncontrolled BP, and (4) use of combination BP-lowering medications. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the association of QI program fidelity measure quartiles with patient panel BP control, while adjusting for patient panel characteristics.

Results: The mean patient age was 63.2 years (SD 12.8), 45.1% were men; race/ethnicity was Non-Hispanic (NH) White in 60.5%, NH Black in 20.3%, and Hispanic in 14.0%. Average patient panel BP control rate was 69.1%. After adjustment, the highest AOBP and 30-day follow-up visit quartiles were associated with a 15.1% (95% CI, 8.9%-21.4%) and 12.3% (95% CI, 6.8%-17.7%) higher percentage of clinician-patient panels with controlled BP compared to the lowest quartile. No association was noted with other fidelity measures and BP control.

Conclusion: Increasing fidelity with hypertension QI interventions may help clinicians improve BP control rates within their patient panel.

临床医生对高血压质量改善计划的忠实度与临床患者小组内的血压控制有关。
背景:临床医生对高血压质量改善(QI)干预措施的忠诚度差异可能影响血压(BP)控制。方法:本研究分析了87名医生、7名高级执业护士和173名住院医生在一年中对35,115名患者进行的89,230次临床接触的数据,以检验临床-患者小组的保真度测量与QI干预和血压控制的关系。血压控制(血压结果:患者平均年龄63.2岁(SD 12.8), 45.1%为男性;非西班牙裔(NH)白人占60.5%,NH黑人占20.3%,西班牙裔占14.0%。患者面板血压控制率平均为69.1%。调整后,与最低四分位数相比,最高AOBP和30天随访四分位数与控制血压的临床-患者小组比例分别高出15.1% (95% CI 8.9%, 21.4%)和12.3% (95% CI 6.8%, 17.7%)。其他保真度测量与血压控制无关联。结论:提高高血压QI干预的保真度可能有助于临床医生提高患者组内的血压控制率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hypertension
American Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书