Energy efficiency in times of geopolitical uncertainty: A global analysis across income levels

IF 3.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Bless Kofi Edziah, Sun Huaping, Emmanuel Anyigbah, Bright Akwasi Gyamfi, Simplice Asongu
{"title":"Energy efficiency in times of geopolitical uncertainty: A global analysis across income levels","authors":"Bless Kofi Edziah,&nbsp;Sun Huaping,&nbsp;Emmanuel Anyigbah,&nbsp;Bright Akwasi Gyamfi,&nbsp;Simplice Asongu","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10381-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Macroeconomic uncertainties—such as political risk and economic policy instability—have been widely examined in relation to energy transition, security, and environmental performance. However, their impact on energy efficiency remains underexplored. A key question emerges: do geopolitical risks impede energy efficiency or do they compel governments to enhance efficiency and reduce import dependence? This paradox calls for empirical investigation. While recent studies suggest that geopolitical threats may still improve energy efficiency in Europe due to their advanced infrastructure and technological capacity, it is unclear whether these findings hold globally and how outcomes differ across income groups. To address this gap, we employ a news-based geopolitical risk index and endogenous stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to provide a comprehensive global assessment across income levels and time periods for 1985–2022. The results show that geopolitical risks significantly increase global energy inefficiency, with low-income countries most severely affected. However, evidence indicates that, over time, countries may adapt by improving efficiency and diversifying energy sources. Counterfactual scenarios analysis further demonstrates that reducing geopolitical risks could lower global energy inefficiency by at least 13%. These findings highlight the importance of policies that both mitigate geopolitical risks and strengthen the resilience of energy systems worldwide.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12053-025-10381-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-025-10381-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Macroeconomic uncertainties—such as political risk and economic policy instability—have been widely examined in relation to energy transition, security, and environmental performance. However, their impact on energy efficiency remains underexplored. A key question emerges: do geopolitical risks impede energy efficiency or do they compel governments to enhance efficiency and reduce import dependence? This paradox calls for empirical investigation. While recent studies suggest that geopolitical threats may still improve energy efficiency in Europe due to their advanced infrastructure and technological capacity, it is unclear whether these findings hold globally and how outcomes differ across income groups. To address this gap, we employ a news-based geopolitical risk index and endogenous stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to provide a comprehensive global assessment across income levels and time periods for 1985–2022. The results show that geopolitical risks significantly increase global energy inefficiency, with low-income countries most severely affected. However, evidence indicates that, over time, countries may adapt by improving efficiency and diversifying energy sources. Counterfactual scenarios analysis further demonstrates that reducing geopolitical risks could lower global energy inefficiency by at least 13%. These findings highlight the importance of policies that both mitigate geopolitical risks and strengthen the resilience of energy systems worldwide.

Graphical abstract

地缘政治不确定时期的能源效率:跨收入水平的全球分析
宏观经济的不确定性——如政治风险和经济政策的不稳定性——已经在能源转型、安全和环境绩效方面得到了广泛的研究。然而,它们对能源效率的影响仍未得到充分探讨。一个关键问题出现了:地缘政治风险会阻碍能源效率,还是会迫使政府提高效率并减少对进口的依赖?这一悖论需要实证研究。虽然最近的研究表明,由于欧洲先进的基础设施和技术能力,地缘政治威胁可能仍会提高欧洲的能源效率,但目前尚不清楚这些发现是否适用于全球,以及不同收入群体的结果有何不同。为了解决这一差距,我们采用基于新闻的地缘政治风险指数和内生随机前沿分析(SFA)来提供1985-2022年收入水平和时间段的全面全球评估。结果表明,地缘政治风险显著加剧了全球能源效率低下,其中低收入国家受影响最为严重。然而,有证据表明,随着时间的推移,各国可以通过提高效率和使能源多样化来适应。反事实情景分析进一步表明,降低地缘政治风险可以使全球能源效率降低至少13%。这些发现强调了既能减轻地缘政治风险又能增强全球能源系统弹性的政策的重要性。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书