Refractory microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer: a comparison between botensilimab + balstilimab and current standard of care

Immuno-oncology technology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.iotech.2025.101558
E. Bengala , D. Santini , V. Picone
{"title":"Refractory microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer: a comparison between botensilimab + balstilimab and current standard of care","authors":"E. Bengala ,&nbsp;D. Santini ,&nbsp;V. Picone","doi":"10.1016/j.iotech.2025.101558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The combination of botensilimab + balstilimab demonstrated promising clinical activity in heavily pre-treated patients with microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a recently published phase I study (NCT03860272).</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Our objective was to derive overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety data from the trials of reference of the current standard of care for refractory mCRC and from the above-mentioned study, and to compare them. After a systematic search of PubMed, we selected four studies (SUNLIGHT, FRESCO-2, RECOURSE, CORRECT). Individual patient OS and PFS data were extracted from Kaplan–Meier curves and more frequent toxic effect rates were collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Immunotherapy showed higher efficacy in terms of median OS both compared with trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.89] and to later lines of treatment: fruquintinib, regorafenib, and trifluridine-tipiracil alone. These results were confirmed by median PFS comparison of all the therapies except for the trifluridine-tipiracil + bevacizumab combination (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.61 in favor of trifluridine-tipiracil + bevacizumab). As for treatment-related adverse events the most frequent with immunotherapy were fatigue and diarrhea. The other regimens were associated with hematologic toxic effects, nausea, hypertension, and dermatological toxicity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest that the immunotherapy combination appears to be a potential option for patients with refractory mCRC while being associated with a completely different toxicity profile. However, confirmation of its efficacy awaits the results of randomized studies. Better comprehension of disease characteristics related to treatment response, such as metastatic sites and molecular biology, is warranted for patient selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73352,"journal":{"name":"Immuno-oncology technology","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101558"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immuno-oncology technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590018825005180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The combination of botensilimab + balstilimab demonstrated promising clinical activity in heavily pre-treated patients with microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a recently published phase I study (NCT03860272).

Patients and methods

Our objective was to derive overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety data from the trials of reference of the current standard of care for refractory mCRC and from the above-mentioned study, and to compare them. After a systematic search of PubMed, we selected four studies (SUNLIGHT, FRESCO-2, RECOURSE, CORRECT). Individual patient OS and PFS data were extracted from Kaplan–Meier curves and more frequent toxic effect rates were collected.

Results

Immunotherapy showed higher efficacy in terms of median OS both compared with trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.89] and to later lines of treatment: fruquintinib, regorafenib, and trifluridine-tipiracil alone. These results were confirmed by median PFS comparison of all the therapies except for the trifluridine-tipiracil + bevacizumab combination (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.61 in favor of trifluridine-tipiracil + bevacizumab). As for treatment-related adverse events the most frequent with immunotherapy were fatigue and diarrhea. The other regimens were associated with hematologic toxic effects, nausea, hypertension, and dermatological toxicity.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the immunotherapy combination appears to be a potential option for patients with refractory mCRC while being associated with a completely different toxicity profile. However, confirmation of its efficacy awaits the results of randomized studies. Better comprehension of disease characteristics related to treatment response, such as metastatic sites and molecular biology, is warranted for patient selection.
难治性微卫星稳定转移性结直肠癌:博腾西单抗+巴斯蒂单抗与当前治疗标准的比较
在最近发表的一项I期研究(NCT03860272)中,botensilimab + balstilimab联合应用在大量预处理的微卫星稳定转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中显示出良好的临床活性。患者和方法我们的目标是从目前难治性mCRC的标准治疗和上述研究的参考试验中获得总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和安全性数据,并对它们进行比较。在系统检索PubMed后,我们选择了四项研究(SUNLIGHT, FRESCO-2, resource, CORRECT)。从Kaplan-Meier曲线中提取个体患者的OS和PFS数据,并收集更频繁的毒性效应率。结果免疫组化治疗的中位总生存期(median OS)均高于trifluridin -tipiracil + bevacizumab[风险比(HR) 0.62, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.44-0.89],也高于后来的治疗方案:fruquininib、reorafenib和trifluridin -tipiracil单用。这些结果通过除trifluridin -tipiracil + bevacizumab联合外的所有治疗的中位PFS比较得到证实(HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.61,支持trifluridin -tipiracil + bevacizumab)。至于治疗相关的不良事件,免疫治疗最常见的是疲劳和腹泻。其他方案与血液学毒性作用、恶心、高血压和皮肤毒性有关。结论:这些研究结果表明,免疫治疗组合似乎是难治性mCRC患者的潜在选择,但与完全不同的毒性相关。然而,其有效性有待随机研究结果的证实。更好地理解与治疗反应相关的疾病特征,如转移部位和分子生物学,对患者的选择是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书