Impact of Biofilm Decontamination Methods on Implant-Abutment Surface Integrity: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Clinical Oral Implants Research Pub Date : 2026-03-10 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI:10.1111/clr.70077
Leoluca Valeriani, Arianna Giovannini, Nicola Marco Sforza, Luca Landi, Cristiano Tomasi, Marco Montevecchi
{"title":"Impact of Biofilm Decontamination Methods on Implant-Abutment Surface Integrity: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies","authors":"Leoluca Valeriani,&nbsp;Arianna Giovannini,&nbsp;Nicola Marco Sforza,&nbsp;Luca Landi,&nbsp;Cristiano Tomasi,&nbsp;Marco Montevecchi","doi":"10.1111/clr.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To systematically analyze the impact of biofilm disruption and decontamination methods on the surface of dental implants and abutments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in September 2024. Only quantitative studies analyzing surface alterations caused by physical, mechanical, and chemical decontamination procedures were included. The risk of bias was assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-nine studies, all in vitro, were selected. Surface alterations were assessed using profilometer and microscope and were reported through Ra, Rz, and Sa roughness parameters. Differences in surface roughness between control and test groups were evaluated. For titanium machined surfaces, the surface roughness increases or decreases in 96% of cases for Ra and 100% for Sa and Rz, with no consistent pattern. Titanium modified surfaces generally show a reduction trend in roughness parameters following decontamination, though the extent and consistency of this reduction vary across studies. Few studies on zirconia reported minimal surface alteration, with Ra changes between −0.05 and 0.06 and Sa between 0.2 and 0.8 μm. Overall, due to methodological variability, no universally safe tool for maintaining surface integrity could be clearly identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The inconclusive and heterogeneous nature of the findings suggests that surface alterations should be considered alongside other factors, rather than as a stand-alone determinant, when selecting implant surface decontamination methods. Clinical trials are suggested to assess the impact of these alterations on clinical outcomes, such as bacterial growth and biological complications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"37 3","pages":"247-261"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.70077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.70077","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim

To systematically analyze the impact of biofilm disruption and decontamination methods on the surface of dental implants and abutments.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in September 2024. Only quantitative studies analyzing surface alterations caused by physical, mechanical, and chemical decontamination procedures were included. The risk of bias was assessed.

Results

Twenty-nine studies, all in vitro, were selected. Surface alterations were assessed using profilometer and microscope and were reported through Ra, Rz, and Sa roughness parameters. Differences in surface roughness between control and test groups were evaluated. For titanium machined surfaces, the surface roughness increases or decreases in 96% of cases for Ra and 100% for Sa and Rz, with no consistent pattern. Titanium modified surfaces generally show a reduction trend in roughness parameters following decontamination, though the extent and consistency of this reduction vary across studies. Few studies on zirconia reported minimal surface alteration, with Ra changes between −0.05 and 0.06 and Sa between 0.2 and 0.8 μm. Overall, due to methodological variability, no universally safe tool for maintaining surface integrity could be clearly identified.

Conclusions

The inconclusive and heterogeneous nature of the findings suggests that surface alterations should be considered alongside other factors, rather than as a stand-alone determinant, when selecting implant surface decontamination methods. Clinical trials are suggested to assess the impact of these alterations on clinical outcomes, such as bacterial growth and biological complications.

生物膜净化方法对种植体-基牙表面完整性的影响:定量研究的系统综述。
背景与目的系统分析生物膜破坏和去污方法对种植体和基牙表面的影响。方法于2024年9月对PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science进行系统检索。仅定量研究分析了由物理、机械和化学净化程序引起的表面变化。评估偏倚风险。结果入选29项体外研究。使用轮廓仪和显微镜评估表面变化,并通过Ra, Rz和Sa粗糙度参数报告。评估对照组和试验组之间表面粗糙度的差异。对于钛加工表面,Ra的表面粗糙度增加或减少的比例为96%,Sa和Rz的表面粗糙度增加或减少的比例为100%,但没有一致的规律。钛改性表面在去污后粗糙度参数一般呈降低趋势,尽管这种降低的程度和一致性在不同的研究中有所不同。氧化锆表面变化较小,Ra变化在-0.05 ~ 0.06 μm之间,Sa变化在0.2 ~ 0.8 μm之间。总的来说,由于方法的可变性,没有普遍安全的工具来保持表面完整性可以清楚地确定。结论:研究结果的不确定性和异质性表明,在选择种植体表面净化方法时,表面改变应与其他因素一起考虑,而不是作为一个单独的决定因素。建议进行临床试验,以评估这些改变对临床结果的影响,如细菌生长和生物学并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.60%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书