Computational drug design in the artificial intelligence era: A systematic review of molecular representations, generative architectures, and performance assessment.

IF 20.3 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacological Reviews Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.pharmr.2025.100095
Karim Abbasi, Parvin Razzaghi, Ali Gharizadeh, Amin Ghareyazi, Abbas Dehnad, Hamid R Rabiee, Mohammad R K Mofrad
{"title":"Computational drug design in the artificial intelligence era: A systematic review of molecular representations, generative architectures, and performance assessment.","authors":"Karim Abbasi, Parvin Razzaghi, Ali Gharizadeh, Amin Ghareyazi, Abbas Dehnad, Hamid R Rabiee, Mohammad R K Mofrad","doi":"10.1016/j.pharmr.2025.100095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Generative drug design has emerged as a transformative approach in pharmaceutical research, leveraging deep learning models to create novel molecules with targeted properties. This systematic review analyzes the current landscape of computational approaches across 3 critical dimensions: molecular representation strategies (1-dimensional, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional), generative architectural frameworks (including variational autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, reinforcement learning systems, and diffusion models), and evaluation methodologies. We provide a comprehensive categorization of these approaches, critically assessing their relative advantages and limitations. Additionally, we examine the datasets driving development in this field and the metrics employed to evaluate model performance. Through structured analysis of these interconnected components, we identify significant research gaps and propose promising future directions for advancing artificial intelligence-driven drug discovery. This review offers researchers a unified framework for understanding the complex interplay between representation choices, generative mechanisms, and evaluation paradigms in computational drug design. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review provides a unique framework for generative drug design by categorizing methods first by drug representation and then by generative model type. This novel taxonomy clarifies which models are best suited for specific molecular data types, offering practical guidance for researchers. We also critically discuss the advantages, disadvantages, key datasets, and evaluation metrics, delivering a comprehensive and actionable resource for the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":19780,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reviews","volume":"78 1","pages":"100095"},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmr.2025.100095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative drug design has emerged as a transformative approach in pharmaceutical research, leveraging deep learning models to create novel molecules with targeted properties. This systematic review analyzes the current landscape of computational approaches across 3 critical dimensions: molecular representation strategies (1-dimensional, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional), generative architectural frameworks (including variational autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, reinforcement learning systems, and diffusion models), and evaluation methodologies. We provide a comprehensive categorization of these approaches, critically assessing their relative advantages and limitations. Additionally, we examine the datasets driving development in this field and the metrics employed to evaluate model performance. Through structured analysis of these interconnected components, we identify significant research gaps and propose promising future directions for advancing artificial intelligence-driven drug discovery. This review offers researchers a unified framework for understanding the complex interplay between representation choices, generative mechanisms, and evaluation paradigms in computational drug design. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review provides a unique framework for generative drug design by categorizing methods first by drug representation and then by generative model type. This novel taxonomy clarifies which models are best suited for specific molecular data types, offering practical guidance for researchers. We also critically discuss the advantages, disadvantages, key datasets, and evaluation metrics, delivering a comprehensive and actionable resource for the field.

人工智能时代的计算药物设计:对分子表征、生成架构和性能评估的系统回顾。
生成式药物设计已经成为制药研究中的一种变革性方法,利用深度学习模型来创造具有目标特性的新分子。本系统综述分析了计算方法在三个关键维度上的现状:分子表示策略(一维、二维和三维)、生成架构框架(包括变分自编码器、生成对抗网络、强化学习系统和扩散模型)和评估方法。我们对这些方法进行了全面的分类,批判性地评估了它们的相对优势和局限性。此外,我们还研究了驱动该领域发展的数据集以及用于评估模型性能的度量。通过对这些相互关联的成分进行结构化分析,我们确定了重大的研究空白,并为推进人工智能驱动的药物发现提出了有希望的未来方向。这一综述为研究人员提供了一个统一的框架来理解计算药物设计中表征选择、生成机制和评估范式之间复杂的相互作用。意义声明:本综述通过首先按药物表示然后按生成模型类型对方法进行分类,为生成药物设计提供了一个独特的框架。这种新颖的分类法澄清了哪些模型最适合于特定的分子数据类型,为研究人员提供了实用的指导。我们还批判性地讨论了优点、缺点、关键数据集和评估指标,为该领域提供了全面和可操作的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacological Reviews
Pharmacological Reviews 医学-药学
CiteScore
34.70
自引率
0.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pharmacological Reviews is a highly popular and well-received journal that has a long and rich history of success. It was first published in 1949 and is currently published bimonthly online by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. The journal is indexed or abstracted by various databases, including Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews Database, Biosciences Information Service, Current Contents/Life Sciences, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Index Medicus, Index to Scientific Reviews, Medical Documentation Service, Reference Update, Research Alerts, Science Citation Index, and SciSearch. Pharmacological Reviews offers comprehensive reviews of new pharmacological fields and is able to stay up-to-date with published content. Overall, it is highly regarded by scholars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书