Biomedical and insecticidal efficacy of green synthesized nanoparticles from underexplored Tanzanian medicinal plants: A comparative study using Pueraria montana, Vernonia amygdalina, and Tephrosia vogelii

IF 3.7
Next Nanotechnology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.nxnano.2025.100323
Sylvanus Bisaba Ruvubu , Indrajit Roy
{"title":"Biomedical and insecticidal efficacy of green synthesized nanoparticles from underexplored Tanzanian medicinal plants: A comparative study using Pueraria montana, Vernonia amygdalina, and Tephrosia vogelii","authors":"Sylvanus Bisaba Ruvubu ,&nbsp;Indrajit Roy","doi":"10.1016/j.nxnano.2025.100323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the biomedical and insecticidal potential of green-synthesized nanoparticles (NPs) from <em>Pueraria montana</em> roots, <em>Vernonia amygdalina</em>, and <em>Tephrosia vogelii</em> leaves. Antibacterial activity of ZnO, CuO, AgNPs, and NiO–CuO nanocomposites was tested against <em>S. aureus</em>, <em>S. pyogenes</em>, and <em>E. coli</em>. The nanoparticles (ROS) generation, disruption of the cell membrane, release of metal ions, and synergistic effects of phytochemical capping agents. The AgNPs showed the strongest activity against gram-positive strains, while ZnO was more effective against <em>E. coli.</em> CuO and AgNPs outperformed ZnO due to smaller size and higher reactivity. At 50 µg/disc, most of these NPs achieved over 70 % of standard antibiotic efficacy. Insecticidal testing against <em>Periplaneta americana</em> showed that <em>T. vogelii</em> derived ZnO NPs caused 33.3 % mortality in 20 min at 50 ppm and over 99 % at 100–200 ppm in 2–6 h. Based on MIC assays conducted using standard broth microdilution methods, AgNPs exhibited the lowest inhibitory concentrations (12.5 ± 0.5 µg/ml) against <em>S. aureus</em> and <em>S. pyogenes</em>, demonstrating stronger antibacterial potency than CuO, ZnO, and NiO–CuO nanoparticles. In contrast, ZnO nanocomposites showed the greatest efficacy against <em>E. coli</em> (MIC value of 14.2 ± 1.4 µg/ml), highlighting differential activity of the green-synthesized nanoparticles depending on bacterial type. These quantitative results provide robust experimental support for the comparative efficacy, linking nanoparticle physicochemical properties, ion release, ROS generation, and phytochemical capping to observed antibacterial performance and thus indicating AgNPs’ superior activity against Gram-positive bacteria. Statistical analysis confirmed significant effects of these plant-based nanoparticles’ type, dose, and exposure. Characterization with UV–Vis, FTIR, SEM, and XRD confirmed desirable physicochemical properties and strong bioactivity. The two-way ANOVA for corrected mortality in (%) showed that both time and treatment type had statistically significant effect (p &lt; 0.05) on insecticidal efficacy (Corrected Mortality). Insecticidal activity was found not only depended on what is applied and nature of treatment such as NPs type, but also how long it has been applied and the dosage or concentration used. Therefore, both formulation type and exposure duration were critical for insect control strategies. The Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) as a post hoc (analysis after ANOVA test) showed that <em>Tephrosia vogelii</em> was significantly more effective than both <em>Puéraria montana</em> (p = 0.001) and <em>Vernonia amygdalina</em> (p = 0.001) in causing insect mortality. Additionally, there was no significant difference between <em>Puéraria montana</em> and <em>Vernonia amygdalina</em> (p = 0.368), suggesting comparable efficacy between them since ANOVA fails to tell where the difference lies. Thus, <em>Tephrosia vogelii</em> appears to be the most promising candidate for insecticidal applications among the three plant extracts tested based on large mean differences and lower p values attested. Synthesized ZnO nanoparticles from <em>Tephrosia vogelii</em> extract exhibited the highest insecticidal activity against <em>Periplaneta americana</em>, surpassing those from <em>Puéraria montana</em> and <em>Vernonia amygdalina</em>. This insecticidal superiority of ZnO NPs from <em>Tephrosia vogelii</em> is probably due to its rich phytochemical profile including rotenone, tephrosine, and degeline enhancing nanoparticle synthesis, surface reactivity, and stability. The fumigant application of nanoparticles was more effective than contact exposure, in inducing faster and higher mortality (notably at 10 % dose within 1–3 h).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100959,"journal":{"name":"Next Nanotechnology","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100323"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Nanotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949829525001925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the biomedical and insecticidal potential of green-synthesized nanoparticles (NPs) from Pueraria montana roots, Vernonia amygdalina, and Tephrosia vogelii leaves. Antibacterial activity of ZnO, CuO, AgNPs, and NiO–CuO nanocomposites was tested against S. aureus, S. pyogenes, and E. coli. The nanoparticles (ROS) generation, disruption of the cell membrane, release of metal ions, and synergistic effects of phytochemical capping agents. The AgNPs showed the strongest activity against gram-positive strains, while ZnO was more effective against E. coli. CuO and AgNPs outperformed ZnO due to smaller size and higher reactivity. At 50 µg/disc, most of these NPs achieved over 70 % of standard antibiotic efficacy. Insecticidal testing against Periplaneta americana showed that T. vogelii derived ZnO NPs caused 33.3 % mortality in 20 min at 50 ppm and over 99 % at 100–200 ppm in 2–6 h. Based on MIC assays conducted using standard broth microdilution methods, AgNPs exhibited the lowest inhibitory concentrations (12.5 ± 0.5 µg/ml) against S. aureus and S. pyogenes, demonstrating stronger antibacterial potency than CuO, ZnO, and NiO–CuO nanoparticles. In contrast, ZnO nanocomposites showed the greatest efficacy against E. coli (MIC value of 14.2 ± 1.4 µg/ml), highlighting differential activity of the green-synthesized nanoparticles depending on bacterial type. These quantitative results provide robust experimental support for the comparative efficacy, linking nanoparticle physicochemical properties, ion release, ROS generation, and phytochemical capping to observed antibacterial performance and thus indicating AgNPs’ superior activity against Gram-positive bacteria. Statistical analysis confirmed significant effects of these plant-based nanoparticles’ type, dose, and exposure. Characterization with UV–Vis, FTIR, SEM, and XRD confirmed desirable physicochemical properties and strong bioactivity. The two-way ANOVA for corrected mortality in (%) showed that both time and treatment type had statistically significant effect (p < 0.05) on insecticidal efficacy (Corrected Mortality). Insecticidal activity was found not only depended on what is applied and nature of treatment such as NPs type, but also how long it has been applied and the dosage or concentration used. Therefore, both formulation type and exposure duration were critical for insect control strategies. The Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) as a post hoc (analysis after ANOVA test) showed that Tephrosia vogelii was significantly more effective than both Puéraria montana (p = 0.001) and Vernonia amygdalina (p = 0.001) in causing insect mortality. Additionally, there was no significant difference between Puéraria montana and Vernonia amygdalina (p = 0.368), suggesting comparable efficacy between them since ANOVA fails to tell where the difference lies. Thus, Tephrosia vogelii appears to be the most promising candidate for insecticidal applications among the three plant extracts tested based on large mean differences and lower p values attested. Synthesized ZnO nanoparticles from Tephrosia vogelii extract exhibited the highest insecticidal activity against Periplaneta americana, surpassing those from Puéraria montana and Vernonia amygdalina. This insecticidal superiority of ZnO NPs from Tephrosia vogelii is probably due to its rich phytochemical profile including rotenone, tephrosine, and degeline enhancing nanoparticle synthesis, surface reactivity, and stability. The fumigant application of nanoparticles was more effective than contact exposure, in inducing faster and higher mortality (notably at 10 % dose within 1–3 h).
从未开发的坦桑尼亚药用植物中合成的绿色纳米颗粒的生物医学和杀虫功效:对蒙大拿葛根、苦杏仁花和灰根草的比较研究
本研究探讨了绿色合成纳米颗粒(NPs)的生物医学和杀虫潜力,这些纳米颗粒来自于蒙葛根、苦杏仁树和毛茛叶。研究了ZnO、CuO、AgNPs和NiO-CuO纳米复合材料对金黄色葡萄球菌、化脓性葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的抑菌活性。纳米颗粒(ROS)的产生,细胞膜的破坏,金属离子的释放,以及植物化学封盖剂的协同作用。AgNPs对革兰氏阳性菌株的活性最强,而ZnO对大肠杆菌的活性更强。CuO和AgNPs由于更小的尺寸和更高的反应性而优于ZnO。在50 µg/盘的浓度下,大多数NPs达到标准抗生素疗效的70% %以上。对美洲大蠊的杀虫试验表明,在50 ppm浓度下,vogelii衍生的ZnO NPs在20 min内的死亡率为33.3% %;在100-200 ppm浓度下,在2-6 h内的死亡率超过99 %。采用标准肉汤微量稀释法进行MIC测定,AgNPs对金黄色葡萄球菌和化脓性葡萄球菌的抑菌浓度最低(12.5 ± 0.5 µg/ml),抑菌效果优于CuO、ZnO和NiO-CuO纳米颗粒。相比之下,ZnO纳米复合材料对大肠杆菌的效果最好(MIC值为14.2 ± 1.4 µg/ml),这表明绿色合成的纳米颗粒对不同细菌类型的活性存在差异。这些定量结果为比较功效提供了强有力的实验支持,将纳米颗粒的物理化学性质、离子释放、ROS生成和植物化学覆盖与观察到的抗菌性能联系起来,从而表明AgNPs对革兰氏阳性细菌具有优越的活性。统计分析证实了这些植物基纳米颗粒的类型、剂量和暴露的显著影响。通过UV-Vis, FTIR, SEM和XRD表征,证实了其良好的理化性质和较强的生物活性。校正死亡率(%)的双因素方差分析显示,时间和处理方式对杀虫效果的影响均有统计学意义(p <; 0.05)。发现杀虫活性不仅取决于所施用的杀虫剂和处理的性质,如NPs类型,而且还取决于施用的时间和使用的剂量或浓度。因此,杀虫剂类型和暴露时间对昆虫防治策略至关重要。事后分析(方差分析后的分析)表明,在引起昆虫死亡方面,灰带绦虫(Tephrosia vogelii)明显比蒙大拿普萨姆亚(p = 0.001)和苦杏仁(p = 0.001)更有效。此外,蒙大拿和杏仁桃无显著性差异(p = 0.368),表明它们之间的疗效相当,因为方差分析无法说明差异在哪里。因此,基于较大的平均差异和较低的p值,在三种被测试的植物提取物中,红毛莲似乎是最有希望用于杀虫应用的候选者。以粗麻提取物为原料合成的氧化锌纳米粒子对美洲大蠊的杀虫活性最高,超过了蒙大拿绒蚧和扁桃粉的杀虫活性。这种杀虫优势可能是由于其丰富的植物化学成分,包括鱼藤酮、棉氨酸和脱胶质,增强了纳米颗粒的合成、表面反应性和稳定性。纳米颗粒熏蒸剂的应用比接触暴露更有效,在诱导更快和更高的死亡率方面(特别是在1-3 小时内以10 %的剂量)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书