Resilient innovation and entrepreneurial responses to systemic shocks: Economic insights into sustainable business ecosystems

František Pollák , Kristián Kalamen , Roman Vavrek , Jaroslava Gburová
{"title":"Resilient innovation and entrepreneurial responses to systemic shocks: Economic insights into sustainable business ecosystems","authors":"František Pollák ,&nbsp;Kristián Kalamen ,&nbsp;Roman Vavrek ,&nbsp;Jaroslava Gburová","doi":"10.1016/j.stae.2025.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic exposed systemic vulnerabilities in financial markets and raised pressing questions regarding the resilience of technology and entrepreneurship under shock. This study investigates whether two innovation-intensive sectors, technology and pharmaceuticals, exhibited synchronization with the S&amp;P 500 across eleven epidemiologically defined phases (March 2019–December 2022). Using a robust methodological framework, a crisis-aware synchronization model was developed to detect real-time versus delayed investor alignment. A key novelty of the approach is the incorporation of time lags as a relevant factor influencing responses to systemic shocks. Results show that the technology sector exhibited statistically significant contemporaneous co-movement, consistent with its role as continuity-enabling digital infrastructure, whereas pharmaceutical sector demonstrated episodic, event-driven co-movement concentrated around vaccine and policy milestones. Notably, correlations during pandemic waves were not stronger than during inter-wave periods for either sector. These findings extend the Adaptive Markets Hypothesis by introducing a sector-contingent perspective: structural integrators (technology) stabilize expectations in real time, while event-contingent innovators (pharmaceuticals) generate punctuated alignment. For sustainable finance and entrepreneurship, the results suggest actionable levers: technology should be treated as a portfolio anchor and a policy priority for resilient digital infrastructure (measured in terms of uptime, scalability, energy efficiency), while pharmaceuticals should be considered a tactical complement, with innovation surges converted into durable capacity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101202,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773032825000288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed systemic vulnerabilities in financial markets and raised pressing questions regarding the resilience of technology and entrepreneurship under shock. This study investigates whether two innovation-intensive sectors, technology and pharmaceuticals, exhibited synchronization with the S&P 500 across eleven epidemiologically defined phases (March 2019–December 2022). Using a robust methodological framework, a crisis-aware synchronization model was developed to detect real-time versus delayed investor alignment. A key novelty of the approach is the incorporation of time lags as a relevant factor influencing responses to systemic shocks. Results show that the technology sector exhibited statistically significant contemporaneous co-movement, consistent with its role as continuity-enabling digital infrastructure, whereas pharmaceutical sector demonstrated episodic, event-driven co-movement concentrated around vaccine and policy milestones. Notably, correlations during pandemic waves were not stronger than during inter-wave periods for either sector. These findings extend the Adaptive Markets Hypothesis by introducing a sector-contingent perspective: structural integrators (technology) stabilize expectations in real time, while event-contingent innovators (pharmaceuticals) generate punctuated alignment. For sustainable finance and entrepreneurship, the results suggest actionable levers: technology should be treated as a portfolio anchor and a policy priority for resilient digital infrastructure (measured in terms of uptime, scalability, energy efficiency), while pharmaceuticals should be considered a tactical complement, with innovation surges converted into durable capacity.
弹性创新和企业对系统冲击的反应:可持续商业生态系统的经济学见解
2019冠状病毒病大流行暴露了金融市场的系统性脆弱性,并对技术和创业在冲击下的复原力提出了紧迫的问题。本研究调查了两个创新密集型行业,技术和制药,是否在11个流行病学定义的阶段(2019年3月- 2022年12月)与标准普尔500指数表现出同步。使用稳健的方法框架,开发了一个危机感知同步模型,以检测实时与延迟的投资者对齐。该方法的一个关键新颖之处在于将时间滞后作为影响对系统性冲击反应的相关因素。结果表明,技术部门表现出统计上显著的同步协同运动,与其作为支持连续性的数字基础设施的作用相一致,而制药部门则表现出偶发的、事件驱动的协同运动,集中在疫苗和政策里程碑周围。值得注意的是,任何一个部门在大流行波期间的相关性并不比波间期强。这些发现通过引入行业偶然性视角扩展了适应性市场假说:结构集成商(技术)实时稳定预期,而事件偶然性创新者(制药)产生间断对齐。对于可持续金融和创业,研究结果提出了可行的杠杆:技术应被视为投资组合的支柱和弹性数字基础设施的政策优先事项(以正常运行时间、可扩展性和能源效率来衡量),而药品应被视为战术补充,将创新浪潮转化为持久的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书