František Pollák , Kristián Kalamen , Roman Vavrek , Jaroslava Gburová
{"title":"Resilient innovation and entrepreneurial responses to systemic shocks: Economic insights into sustainable business ecosystems","authors":"František Pollák , Kristián Kalamen , Roman Vavrek , Jaroslava Gburová","doi":"10.1016/j.stae.2025.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic exposed systemic vulnerabilities in financial markets and raised pressing questions regarding the resilience of technology and entrepreneurship under shock. This study investigates whether two innovation-intensive sectors, technology and pharmaceuticals, exhibited synchronization with the S&P 500 across eleven epidemiologically defined phases (March 2019–December 2022). Using a robust methodological framework, a crisis-aware synchronization model was developed to detect real-time versus delayed investor alignment. A key novelty of the approach is the incorporation of time lags as a relevant factor influencing responses to systemic shocks. Results show that the technology sector exhibited statistically significant contemporaneous co-movement, consistent with its role as continuity-enabling digital infrastructure, whereas pharmaceutical sector demonstrated episodic, event-driven co-movement concentrated around vaccine and policy milestones. Notably, correlations during pandemic waves were not stronger than during inter-wave periods for either sector. These findings extend the Adaptive Markets Hypothesis by introducing a sector-contingent perspective: structural integrators (technology) stabilize expectations in real time, while event-contingent innovators (pharmaceuticals) generate punctuated alignment. For sustainable finance and entrepreneurship, the results suggest actionable levers: technology should be treated as a portfolio anchor and a policy priority for resilient digital infrastructure (measured in terms of uptime, scalability, energy efficiency), while pharmaceuticals should be considered a tactical complement, with innovation surges converted into durable capacity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101202,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773032825000288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed systemic vulnerabilities in financial markets and raised pressing questions regarding the resilience of technology and entrepreneurship under shock. This study investigates whether two innovation-intensive sectors, technology and pharmaceuticals, exhibited synchronization with the S&P 500 across eleven epidemiologically defined phases (March 2019–December 2022). Using a robust methodological framework, a crisis-aware synchronization model was developed to detect real-time versus delayed investor alignment. A key novelty of the approach is the incorporation of time lags as a relevant factor influencing responses to systemic shocks. Results show that the technology sector exhibited statistically significant contemporaneous co-movement, consistent with its role as continuity-enabling digital infrastructure, whereas pharmaceutical sector demonstrated episodic, event-driven co-movement concentrated around vaccine and policy milestones. Notably, correlations during pandemic waves were not stronger than during inter-wave periods for either sector. These findings extend the Adaptive Markets Hypothesis by introducing a sector-contingent perspective: structural integrators (technology) stabilize expectations in real time, while event-contingent innovators (pharmaceuticals) generate punctuated alignment. For sustainable finance and entrepreneurship, the results suggest actionable levers: technology should be treated as a portfolio anchor and a policy priority for resilient digital infrastructure (measured in terms of uptime, scalability, energy efficiency), while pharmaceuticals should be considered a tactical complement, with innovation surges converted into durable capacity.