Multi-Parameter Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Cervix.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Gavin Hamilton, Nicole A Gamboa, Alex N Schlein, Sheida Ebrahimi, Summer J Batasin, Hon Yu, Stephan Jordan, Breanna Hill, Catherine Moran, Ana E Rodriguez Soto, Rebecca Rakow-Penner
{"title":"Multi-Parameter Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Cervix.","authors":"Gavin Hamilton, Nicole A Gamboa, Alex N Schlein, Sheida Ebrahimi, Summer J Batasin, Hon Yu, Stephan Jordan, Breanna Hill, Catherine Moran, Ana E Rodriguez Soto, Rebecca Rakow-Penner","doi":"10.1002/nbm.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to examine cervix-adapted versions of steady-state multi-parameter MRS (SMP MRS) and flip-angle-corrected multi-parameter MRS (CMP MRS), comparing estimated cervix T1<sub>w</sub> and T2<sub>w</sub> for the two sequences. CMP MRS and SMP MRS were adapted from liver versions of the sequences, adding long TR acquisitions to better estimate cervix T1<sub>w</sub>. CMP MRS differs from SMP MRS by correcting for inaccurate B1 calibration. Both CMP MRS and SMP MRS were acquired at 3 T in 13 adult female subjects (10 healthy, 3 with cancer). Values of T1<sub>w</sub> and T2<sub>w</sub> were estimated from both sequences, and the relationship between the values was examined. While there was no significant difference in T1<sub>w</sub> given by the two sequences (CMP T1<sub>w</sub> = 1568 ms, SMP T1<sub>w</sub> = 1571 ms, p = 0.95; SMP T1<sub>w</sub> = 0.657 CMP T1<sub>w</sub> + 541 ms, r = 0.36), there was a single case where SMP MRS underestimated T1<sub>w</sub> by over 400 ms. A significant difference was observed in T2<sub>w</sub> (CMP T2<sub>w</sub> = 39.9 ms, SMP T2<sub>w</sub> = 45.6 ms, p = 0.001; SMP T2<sub>w</sub> = 0.812 CMP T2<sub>w</sub> + 13.3 ms, r = 0.87). Cervix adapted CMP MRS and SMP MRS both successfully estimated values of T1<sub>w</sub> and T2<sub>w</sub>, though the single case where SMP MRS gave a non-physical T1<sub>w</sub> suggests CMP MRS may be better suited for cervix T1<sub>w</sub> estimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19309,"journal":{"name":"NMR in Biomedicine","volume":"39 1","pages":"e70211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMR in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine cervix-adapted versions of steady-state multi-parameter MRS (SMP MRS) and flip-angle-corrected multi-parameter MRS (CMP MRS), comparing estimated cervix T1w and T2w for the two sequences. CMP MRS and SMP MRS were adapted from liver versions of the sequences, adding long TR acquisitions to better estimate cervix T1w. CMP MRS differs from SMP MRS by correcting for inaccurate B1 calibration. Both CMP MRS and SMP MRS were acquired at 3 T in 13 adult female subjects (10 healthy, 3 with cancer). Values of T1w and T2w were estimated from both sequences, and the relationship between the values was examined. While there was no significant difference in T1w given by the two sequences (CMP T1w = 1568 ms, SMP T1w = 1571 ms, p = 0.95; SMP T1w = 0.657 CMP T1w + 541 ms, r = 0.36), there was a single case where SMP MRS underestimated T1w by over 400 ms. A significant difference was observed in T2w (CMP T2w = 39.9 ms, SMP T2w = 45.6 ms, p = 0.001; SMP T2w = 0.812 CMP T2w + 13.3 ms, r = 0.87). Cervix adapted CMP MRS and SMP MRS both successfully estimated values of T1w and T2w, though the single case where SMP MRS gave a non-physical T1w suggests CMP MRS may be better suited for cervix T1w estimation.

宫颈多参数磁共振波谱。
本研究的目的是检查子宫颈适应版本的稳态多参数MRS (SMP MRS)和翻转角校正多参数MRS (CMP MRS),比较两个序列的估计子宫颈T1w和T2w。CMP MRS和SMP MRS是根据肝脏版本的序列改编的,增加了长TR采集以更好地估计宫颈T1w。CMP MRS与SMP MRS的不同之处在于校正了不准确的B1校准。13名成年女性受试者(10名健康,3名癌症)均在3岁时获得CMP和SMP MRS。从两个序列中估计T1w和T2w的值,并检验值之间的关系。虽然两个序列给出的T1w没有显著差异(CMP T1w = 1568 ms, SMP T1w = 1571 ms, p = 0.95; SMP T1w = 0.657 CMP T1w + 541 ms, r = 0.36),但SMP MRS低估T1w超过400 ms。两组T2w差异有统计学意义(CMP T2w = 39.9 ms, SMP T2w = 45.6 ms, p = 0.001; SMP T2w = 0.812 CMP T2w + 13.3 ms, r = 0.87)。宫颈采用CMP MRS和SMP MRS都成功地估计了T1w和T2w的值,尽管SMP MRS给出非物理T1w的单一病例表明CMP MRS可能更适合宫颈T1w的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NMR in Biomedicine
NMR in Biomedicine 医学-光谱学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
209
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: NMR in Biomedicine is a journal devoted to the publication of original full-length papers, rapid communications and review articles describing the development of magnetic resonance spectroscopy or imaging methods or their use to investigate physiological, biochemical, biophysical or medical problems. Topics for submitted papers should be in one of the following general categories: (a) development of methods and instrumentation for MR of biological systems; (b) studies of normal or diseased organs, tissues or cells; (c) diagnosis or treatment of disease. Reports may cover work on patients or healthy human subjects, in vivo animal experiments, studies of isolated organs or cultured cells, analysis of tissue extracts, NMR theory, experimental techniques, or instrumentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书