Kidney Transplantation in the Era of Climate Change: Environmental, Structural, and Ethical Implications for Future-Ready Practice.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Nephron Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-11 DOI:10.1159/000550053
Pranesh Jain, Ola Suliman, Henry H L Wu, Rajkumar Chinnadurai
{"title":"Kidney Transplantation in the Era of Climate Change: Environmental, Structural, and Ethical Implications for Future-Ready Practice.","authors":"Pranesh Jain, Ola Suliman, Henry H L Wu, Rajkumar Chinnadurai","doi":"10.1159/000550053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><p>Background: Kidney transplantation and dialysis are the two main modalities of kidney replacement therapy, and both are increasingly challenged by the current climate emergency landscape. Dialysis has long been scrutinised for its high energy and water demands, but transplantation, while generally more sustainable over the long term, also warrants critical evaluation concerning environmental accountability, equity, and resilience. Summary: In this review, we compare the environmental and structural dimensions of dialysis and transplantation, while examining how climate change uniquely affects transplant recipients and grafts. We highlight the vulnerabilities of immunosuppressed recipients to heat stress and infectious diseases, the risks of cold chain disruption for organ preservation and shipment, and the impact of graft failure necessitating return to dialysis. We then consider how green nephrology principles can be applied to transplantation, drawing on emerging UK data, global policy frameworks such as the European Green Deal, and lessons from low- and middle-income countries. Digital healthcare solutions such as hybrid virtual clinics are explored as tangible strategies to reduce the carbon footprint of follow-up care. Recent life-cycle analyses also provide comparative estimates of dialysis and transplantation emissions, underscoring the importance of nuanced evaluation of both modalities. Key Messages: We conclude with a forward-looking agenda for clinicians and policymakers to embed environmental and social responsibility into both dialysis and transplantation, ensuring that kidney replacement therapy as a whole is resilient and sustainable in a warming world. </p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":18998,"journal":{"name":"Nephron","volume":" ","pages":"205-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12810960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000550053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Kidney transplantation and dialysis are the two main modalities of kidney replacement therapy, and both are increasingly challenged by the current climate emergency landscape. Dialysis has long been scrutinised for its high energy and water demands, but transplantation, while generally more sustainable over the long term, also warrants critical evaluation concerning environmental accountability, equity, and resilience. Summary: In this review, we compare the environmental and structural dimensions of dialysis and transplantation, while examining how climate change uniquely affects transplant recipients and grafts. We highlight the vulnerabilities of immunosuppressed recipients to heat stress and infectious diseases, the risks of cold chain disruption for organ preservation and shipment, and the impact of graft failure necessitating return to dialysis. We then consider how green nephrology principles can be applied to transplantation, drawing on emerging UK data, global policy frameworks such as the European Green Deal, and lessons from low- and middle-income countries. Digital healthcare solutions such as hybrid virtual clinics are explored as tangible strategies to reduce the carbon footprint of follow-up care. Recent life-cycle analyses also provide comparative estimates of dialysis and transplantation emissions, underscoring the importance of nuanced evaluation of both modalities. Key Messages: We conclude with a forward-looking agenda for clinicians and policymakers to embed environmental and social responsibility into both dialysis and transplantation, ensuring that kidney replacement therapy as a whole is resilient and sustainable in a warming world.

.

气候变化时代的肾移植:环境、结构和伦理对未来实践的影响。
背景:肾移植和透析是肾脏替代治疗的两种主要方式,两者都受到当前气候紧急情况日益严峻的挑战。长期以来,透析因其高能量和水需求而受到严格审查,但移植虽然从长期来看通常更具可持续性,但也需要对环境问责制、公平性和复原力进行严格评估。摘要:在这篇综述中,我们比较了透析和移植的环境和结构维度,同时研究了气候变化如何独特地影响移植受体和移植物。我们强调了免疫抑制受者对热应激和传染病的脆弱性,器官保存和运输的冷链中断的风险,以及移植失败需要返回透析的影响。然后,我们考虑如何将绿色肾病学原则应用于移植,借鉴新兴的英国数据、全球政策框架(如欧洲绿色协议)以及中低收入国家(LMICs)的经验教训。混合虚拟诊所等数字医疗解决方案被探索为减少后续护理的碳足迹的切实战略。最近的生命周期分析也提供了透析和移植排放的比较估计,强调了对这两种方式进行细致评估的重要性。最后,我们为临床医生和政策制定者提出了一个前瞻性的议程,将环境和社会责任纳入透析和移植,确保肾脏替代疗法在全球变暖的环境中具有弹性和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nephron
Nephron UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ''Nephron'' comprises three sections, which are each under the editorship of internationally recognized leaders and served by specialized Associate Editors. Apart from high-quality original research, ''Nephron'' publishes invited reviews/minireviews on up-to-date topics. Papers undergo an innovative and transparent peer review process encompassing a Presentation Report which assesses and summarizes the presentation of the paper in an unbiased and standardized way.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书