Lanying Pan , Brendan Zhu , Simon L Vu , Antony Stalin , Ashley Winters , Qizhi Gong , Yuan Chen
{"title":"The preference for ammonium may be attributed to a hyperpolarized membrane potential via TWIK-1 channels","authors":"Lanying Pan , Brendan Zhu , Simon L Vu , Antony Stalin , Ashley Winters , Qizhi Gong , Yuan Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2025.150109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urine, which contains ammonium, transmits crucial signals among animals. However, the mechanism underlying signal transmission remains unknown. In our study, we observed that there are significant differences in olfactory preference depending on ammonium concentrations of 0.0004 %, 0.004 %, and 0.04 % between TWIK-1 gene knockout (TWIK-1<sup>−/−</sup>) and wild-type (WT) mice (p < 0.05, n = 6), although there is no significant preference difference between the 4 % concentration groups. These results are consistent with calcium imaging data, which showed an increase in calcium fluorescence only in the olfactory epithelium (OE) of TWIK-1<sup>−/−</sup> mice at 4 and 400 µM NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentrations, but in both groups at 40 mM NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>. The electrophysiological results indicate an increase in the amplitudes of the inward current that hyperpolarizes the membrane potential at 400 µM NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, while it depolarizes the membrane potential at higher NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentrations. These findings suggest a potential mechanism by which ammonium hyperpolarizes the membrane potential via TWIK-1 channels at low concentrations, making the OE cells more difficult to activate and resulting in the differences in olfactory preference between the two groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":"1872 ","pages":"Article 150109"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899325006729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urine, which contains ammonium, transmits crucial signals among animals. However, the mechanism underlying signal transmission remains unknown. In our study, we observed that there are significant differences in olfactory preference depending on ammonium concentrations of 0.0004 %, 0.004 %, and 0.04 % between TWIK-1 gene knockout (TWIK-1−/−) and wild-type (WT) mice (p < 0.05, n = 6), although there is no significant preference difference between the 4 % concentration groups. These results are consistent with calcium imaging data, which showed an increase in calcium fluorescence only in the olfactory epithelium (OE) of TWIK-1−/− mice at 4 and 400 µM NH4+ concentrations, but in both groups at 40 mM NH4+. The electrophysiological results indicate an increase in the amplitudes of the inward current that hyperpolarizes the membrane potential at 400 µM NH4+, while it depolarizes the membrane potential at higher NH4+ concentrations. These findings suggest a potential mechanism by which ammonium hyperpolarizes the membrane potential via TWIK-1 channels at low concentrations, making the OE cells more difficult to activate and resulting in the differences in olfactory preference between the two groups.
期刊介绍:
An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences.
Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed.
With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.