Replacing conventional energy resources with wind: An integrated economic, environmental, and social assessment

IF 4.9 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Utilities Policy Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jup.2025.102085
Haris Ishaq , Osamah Siddiqui , ChengJi Tseng
{"title":"Replacing conventional energy resources with wind: An integrated economic, environmental, and social assessment","authors":"Haris Ishaq ,&nbsp;Osamah Siddiqui ,&nbsp;ChengJi Tseng","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy resources has become an imminent global objective in this era. This paper investigates the economic, social, and environmental aspects of constructing and operating the wind farm through a comprehensive social cost-benefit analysis (SCBA) to assess the project's feasibility for the local Taiwanese population. The monetary values obtained were analyzed using net present value (NPV) methodology, evaluated from both publicly funded and privately owned perspectives. Key findings reveal significant differences between the two options when social and environmental factors are incorporated. Specifically, the NPV results for the publicly funded fixed-rate version are approximately 55.48 billion NTD, while the privately owned version stands at 4.18 billion NTD. Both versions are identified as profitable and feasible projects, provided the annual discount rate remains below 10.5% and 3.2%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis highlights that NPV results are particularly susceptible to fluctuations in capital costs and electricity sales income, with a 25% decrease in the feed-in tariff rate leading to a 43% drop in NPV. This finding suggests the need for a more thorough examination of these critical elements. This study is among the first to apply a comprehensive SCBA framework to an Asian offshore wind farm project, Formosa 2, incorporating not only economic but also environmental and social dimensions. By quantifying these factors, we provide novel insights into the comparative viability of publicly funded versus privately owned models, offering a holistic evidence base to guide renewable energy policy and investment in emerging markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 102085"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725002000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy resources has become an imminent global objective in this era. This paper investigates the economic, social, and environmental aspects of constructing and operating the wind farm through a comprehensive social cost-benefit analysis (SCBA) to assess the project's feasibility for the local Taiwanese population. The monetary values obtained were analyzed using net present value (NPV) methodology, evaluated from both publicly funded and privately owned perspectives. Key findings reveal significant differences between the two options when social and environmental factors are incorporated. Specifically, the NPV results for the publicly funded fixed-rate version are approximately 55.48 billion NTD, while the privately owned version stands at 4.18 billion NTD. Both versions are identified as profitable and feasible projects, provided the annual discount rate remains below 10.5% and 3.2%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis highlights that NPV results are particularly susceptible to fluctuations in capital costs and electricity sales income, with a 25% decrease in the feed-in tariff rate leading to a 43% drop in NPV. This finding suggests the need for a more thorough examination of these critical elements. This study is among the first to apply a comprehensive SCBA framework to an Asian offshore wind farm project, Formosa 2, incorporating not only economic but also environmental and social dimensions. By quantifying these factors, we provide novel insights into the comparative viability of publicly funded versus privately owned models, offering a holistic evidence base to guide renewable energy policy and investment in emerging markets.
用风能替代传统能源:综合经济、环境和社会评估
用可再生能源替代化石燃料已成为这个时代迫在眉睫的全球目标。本文透过综合社会成本效益分析(SCBA),探讨建设及营运风电场的经济、社会及环境因素,以评估项目对台湾当地居民的可行性。获得的货币价值使用净现值(NPV)方法进行分析,从公共资助和私人拥有的角度进行评估。主要调查结果显示,当考虑到社会和环境因素时,两种选择之间存在显著差异。具体而言,公共资助的固定利率版本的净现值结果约为554.8亿新台币,而私人拥有的版本为41.8亿新台币。如果年贴现率分别低于10.5%和3.2%,这两个版本都被认为是有利可图的可行项目。敏感性分析强调,净现值结果特别容易受到资本成本和电力销售收入波动的影响,上网电价下降25%会导致净现值下降43%。这一发现表明需要对这些关键因素进行更彻底的检查。这项研究是第一个将综合SCBA框架应用于亚洲海上风电场项目Formosa 2的研究,不仅考虑了经济因素,还考虑了环境和社会因素。通过量化这些因素,我们对公共资助与私营模式的比较可行性提供了新颖的见解,为指导新兴市场的可再生能源政策和投资提供了全面的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书