Gender differences in social networks under subsistence changes

IF 2.9 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Evolution and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106814
Yaming Huang , Gabriel Šaffa , Shiting Zhang , Pengpeng Bai , Liqiong Zhou , Gui He , Ruth Mace , Juan Du
{"title":"Gender differences in social networks under subsistence changes","authors":"Yaming Huang ,&nbsp;Gabriel Šaffa ,&nbsp;Shiting Zhang ,&nbsp;Pengpeng Bai ,&nbsp;Liqiong Zhou ,&nbsp;Gui He ,&nbsp;Ruth Mace ,&nbsp;Juan Du","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sexual selection theory suggests that gendered social strategies are universal outcomes of reproductive competition, yet recent cross-cultural studies show that these strategies are shaped by socio-ecological factors although they remain insufficiently examined. In particular, little is known about how gendered strategies adapt during periods of rapid social and economic changes. To this end, we examine gender differences in scale and composition of ego-networks, guided by two main hypotheses: that gender roles are shaped by (i) market participation, and (ii) post-marital residence pattern. Using data from 1169 married women and men across 14 Tibetan villages undergoing economic and kinship-system transitions, we applied Bayesian multilevel models to analyse core social relationships. Our findings show that, as men increase their participation in market economies, their networks become more kin-centred – strengthening biological kin ties while loosening friend ties – reflecting an instrumental restructuring of social relationships in response to changing economic roles. In contrast, women's networks remain largely unaffected, likely reflecting the persistence of caregiving responsibilities and strong local embeddedness. Post-marital residence patterns impose comparable trade-offs for both sexes: philopatric individuals prioritise biological kin, while affinal kin can effectively substitute for natal relatives when biological kin become less accessible, forming a balanced, bilateral cooperative network that integrates both kin types. This study underscores that women sustain stable and cohesive social ties across socio-economic transitions, while men adapt their networks more flexibly in response to shifting economic roles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":"47 1","pages":"Article 106814"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513825001631","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual selection theory suggests that gendered social strategies are universal outcomes of reproductive competition, yet recent cross-cultural studies show that these strategies are shaped by socio-ecological factors although they remain insufficiently examined. In particular, little is known about how gendered strategies adapt during periods of rapid social and economic changes. To this end, we examine gender differences in scale and composition of ego-networks, guided by two main hypotheses: that gender roles are shaped by (i) market participation, and (ii) post-marital residence pattern. Using data from 1169 married women and men across 14 Tibetan villages undergoing economic and kinship-system transitions, we applied Bayesian multilevel models to analyse core social relationships. Our findings show that, as men increase their participation in market economies, their networks become more kin-centred – strengthening biological kin ties while loosening friend ties – reflecting an instrumental restructuring of social relationships in response to changing economic roles. In contrast, women's networks remain largely unaffected, likely reflecting the persistence of caregiving responsibilities and strong local embeddedness. Post-marital residence patterns impose comparable trade-offs for both sexes: philopatric individuals prioritise biological kin, while affinal kin can effectively substitute for natal relatives when biological kin become less accessible, forming a balanced, bilateral cooperative network that integrates both kin types. This study underscores that women sustain stable and cohesive social ties across socio-economic transitions, while men adapt their networks more flexibly in response to shifting economic roles.
生存变化下社会网络的性别差异
性选择理论认为,性别社会策略是生殖竞争的普遍结果,然而最近的跨文化研究表明,这些策略是由社会生态因素塑造的,尽管它们仍然没有得到充分的研究。特别是,人们对性别战略如何适应迅速的社会和经济变化时期所知甚少。为此,我们在两个主要假设的指导下,研究了自我网络规模和构成的性别差异:性别角色是由(i)市场参与和(ii)婚后居住模式塑造的。我们的研究结果表明,随着男性越来越多地参与市场经济,他们的网络变得更加以亲属为中心——加强了生物亲属关系,同时放松了朋友关系——反映了社会关系的结构性重构,以应对经济角色的变化。相比之下,女性的人际网络基本上没有受到影响,这可能反映了她们的照顾责任和强烈的地方归属感。婚后居住模式对两性都施加了可比较的权衡:有爱心的个人优先考虑生物亲属,而当生物亲属变得难以获得时,最终亲属可以有效地替代出生亲属,形成一个平衡的双边合作网络,将两种亲属类型整合在一起。这项研究强调,女性在社会经济转型过程中保持稳定和有凝聚力的社会关系,而男性则更灵活地调整其网络,以应对经济角色的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolution and Human Behavior 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书