Statistical analysis plan for the Australasian Resuscitation in sepsis evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors in emergency department sepsis (ARISE FLUIDS) trial
{"title":"Statistical analysis plan for the Australasian Resuscitation in sepsis evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors in emergency department sepsis (ARISE FLUIDS) trial","authors":"Elissa M. Milford BSc, MBBS, PhD, FCICM , Stephen P.J. Macdonald BSc (Hons), MBChB, PhD, DCH, FRCP (Edin), FACEM , Ary Serpa-Neto MD, MSc, PhD, FCICM , Anthony Delaney FCICM, FACEM, PhD , Alisa M. Higgins PhD, MPH, BPhysio (Hons) , Belinda Howe RN, BAppSc (Nursing), CCCert, MPH , Sandra L. Peake FCICM, PhD , ARISE FLUIDS Investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2025.100157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The optimal approach to haemodynamic resuscitation in patients with septic shock is uncertain and will be evaluated in The Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors In emergency Department Sepsis (ARISE FLUIDS) trial.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to describe the prespecified ARISE FLUIDS statistical analysis plan (SAP).</div></div><div><h3>Design, setting, participants, and interventions</h3><div>The ARISE FLUIDS trial is a 1000-participant international multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing restricted intravenous fluid volume and earlier introduction of vasopressors (vasopressor strategy) to larger initial intravenous fluid volume and later introduction of vasopressors if required (fluids strategy) in adults with early septic shock presenting to the emergency department in participating sites in Australia, New Zealand and Ireland.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>The primary outcome is days alive and out of hospital at 90 days post randomisation, and the difference in medians between the two treatment groups will be estimated using a linear quantile mixed-effect regression model. Secondary outcomes include duration of survival censored at day 90, ventilator-, vasopressor-, and acute renal replacement–free days censored at day 28 and death or disability at 6 and 12 months</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ARISE FLUIDS will compare the effects of a vasopressor vs. fluids strategy on days alive and out of hospital at 90 days in adults with early septic shock. The prespecified SAP is reported here to mitigate analysis bias.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":"27 4","pages":"Article 100157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277225000614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The optimal approach to haemodynamic resuscitation in patients with septic shock is uncertain and will be evaluated in The Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors In emergency Department Sepsis (ARISE FLUIDS) trial.
Objective
The objective of this study was to describe the prespecified ARISE FLUIDS statistical analysis plan (SAP).
Design, setting, participants, and interventions
The ARISE FLUIDS trial is a 1000-participant international multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing restricted intravenous fluid volume and earlier introduction of vasopressors (vasopressor strategy) to larger initial intravenous fluid volume and later introduction of vasopressors if required (fluids strategy) in adults with early septic shock presenting to the emergency department in participating sites in Australia, New Zealand and Ireland.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome is days alive and out of hospital at 90 days post randomisation, and the difference in medians between the two treatment groups will be estimated using a linear quantile mixed-effect regression model. Secondary outcomes include duration of survival censored at day 90, ventilator-, vasopressor-, and acute renal replacement–free days censored at day 28 and death or disability at 6 and 12 months
Conclusion
ARISE FLUIDS will compare the effects of a vasopressor vs. fluids strategy on days alive and out of hospital at 90 days in adults with early septic shock. The prespecified SAP is reported here to mitigate analysis bias.
期刊介绍:
ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines.
The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world.
The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.