Dynamics of bacterial community and fermentation quality of wheat straw silage treated with lactic acid bacteria and/or sucrose

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animal Feed Science and Technology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116598
E. Li , Na Na , Nier Wu , Wencan Ke , Chunsheng Bai , Yanlin Xue
{"title":"Dynamics of bacterial community and fermentation quality of wheat straw silage treated with lactic acid bacteria and/or sucrose","authors":"E. Li ,&nbsp;Na Na ,&nbsp;Nier Wu ,&nbsp;Wencan Ke ,&nbsp;Chunsheng Bai ,&nbsp;Yanlin Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to investigate the impact of lactic acid bacteria and sucrose on the bacterial community dynamics and fermentation quality of wheat straw silage. Wheat straw was chopped into 1–2 cm pieces, moistened to 60 %, and ensiled with no additives (CK), <em>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</em> (L, 1 × 10<sup>5</sup> colony-forming units/g fresh weight), sucrose (S, 1 % fresh weight), or their combination (LS). The silages were stored at room temperature and sampled at 1, 3, 6, 15, 35, and 150 days. The S treatment exhibited higher concentrations of lactic acid (LA), acetic acid (AA), and ammonia nitrogen (AN) between days 15 and 35 compared to other treatments. <em>Lactobacillaceae</em> predominated in the CK and L treatments from days 3–35, while <em>Lactobacillaceae-noname</em> became the dominant group by day 150. In contrast, <em>Pantoea</em> remained the dominant genus throughout the fermentation period in the S and LS treatments. Additionally, <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em> abundance fluctuated significantly during fermentation. The abundance of lactic acid bacteria was positively correlated with lactic acid and acetic acid concentrations, and negatively correlated with pH. In conclusion, the addition of <em>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</em> and sucrose to wheat straw silage improved both the microbial community structure and fermentation quality, providing new strategies for agricultural waste utilization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"331 ","pages":"Article 116598"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125003931","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the impact of lactic acid bacteria and sucrose on the bacterial community dynamics and fermentation quality of wheat straw silage. Wheat straw was chopped into 1–2 cm pieces, moistened to 60 %, and ensiled with no additives (CK), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (L, 1 × 105 colony-forming units/g fresh weight), sucrose (S, 1 % fresh weight), or their combination (LS). The silages were stored at room temperature and sampled at 1, 3, 6, 15, 35, and 150 days. The S treatment exhibited higher concentrations of lactic acid (LA), acetic acid (AA), and ammonia nitrogen (AN) between days 15 and 35 compared to other treatments. Lactobacillaceae predominated in the CK and L treatments from days 3–35, while Lactobacillaceae-noname became the dominant group by day 150. In contrast, Pantoea remained the dominant genus throughout the fermentation period in the S and LS treatments. Additionally, Enterobacteriaceae abundance fluctuated significantly during fermentation. The abundance of lactic acid bacteria was positively correlated with lactic acid and acetic acid concentrations, and negatively correlated with pH. In conclusion, the addition of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and sucrose to wheat straw silage improved both the microbial community structure and fermentation quality, providing new strategies for agricultural waste utilization.
乳酸菌和/或蔗糖处理小麦秸秆青贮的细菌群落动态和发酵品质
本试验旨在研究乳酸菌和蔗糖对小麦秸秆青贮细菌群落动态和发酵品质的影响。将麦秸切成1 - 2 cm的小块,润湿至60% %,然后用无添加剂(CK)、植物乳杆菌(L, 1 × 105菌落形成单位/g鲜重)、蔗糖(S, 1 %鲜重)或它们的组合(LS)青贮。青贮在室温下保存,分别于第1、3、6、15、35和150天取样。第15 ~ 35天,S处理的乳酸(LA)、乙酸(AA)和氨氮(AN)浓度高于其他处理。CK和L处理在第3 ~ 35天以乳酸杆菌科为主,第150天以乳酸菌科为主。相比之下,在S和LS处理下,Pantoea在整个发酵过程中都保持优势属。此外,肠杆菌科丰度在发酵过程中波动显著。乳酸菌丰度与乳酸和乙酸浓度呈正相关,与ph呈负相关。综上所述,在小麦秸秆青贮中添加植物乳杆菌和蔗糖,既改善了微生物群落结构,又改善了发酵质量,为农业废弃物的利用提供了新的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书