{"title":"Vegetable yields and environmental impacts vary widely across types, production technologies, and global regions","authors":"Shiyu Cao , Lu Wang , Yi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vegetables are vital for sustainable and healthy diets, but their global environmental footprints remain unclear. This study quantitatively reviews the life-cycle environmental impacts of 13 major vegetables by synthesizing >100 studies. Vegetable yields and environmental impacts vary widely across types, production technologies, and global regions. Median yields and environmental impacts of the most productive vegetable types can exceed those of the least productive types by >40 times and >5 times, respectively (e.g., 356.0 vs. 8.4 t ha<sup>−1</sup>; 0.86 vs. 0.17 kg CO₂e kg<sup>−1</sup>). Compared with open-field systems, facility‑grown systems have generally much higher yields (e.g., +548 % for tomato) and lower blue water footprint (e.g., −75 % for lettuce) but higher carbon footprint (e.g., +273 % for tomato) due to energy-intensive operations. Reducing facility carbon footprint requires energy decarbonization and improved irrigation and nutrient management. On average, carbon footprint, blue water footprint, acidification, eutrophication, human toxicity, and land use per kg of vegetables produced are estimated at 0.52 kg CO₂e, 0.08 m³, 2.73 g SO₂e, 2.37 g PO₄³<sup>−</sup>e, 0.14 kg 1,4‑DCBe, and 0.17 m² a. These quantitative benchmarks can support region-specific mitigation prioritization and inform policy and industry decisions for lower-impact vegetable supply chains. Geograpically, the compiled data skew toward Europe, and in terms of environmental impacts, concentrate on carbon footprint, highlighting the need for more diverse regional coverage and inclusion of non-carbon footprints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 108735"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925006123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Vegetables are vital for sustainable and healthy diets, but their global environmental footprints remain unclear. This study quantitatively reviews the life-cycle environmental impacts of 13 major vegetables by synthesizing >100 studies. Vegetable yields and environmental impacts vary widely across types, production technologies, and global regions. Median yields and environmental impacts of the most productive vegetable types can exceed those of the least productive types by >40 times and >5 times, respectively (e.g., 356.0 vs. 8.4 t ha−1; 0.86 vs. 0.17 kg CO₂e kg−1). Compared with open-field systems, facility‑grown systems have generally much higher yields (e.g., +548 % for tomato) and lower blue water footprint (e.g., −75 % for lettuce) but higher carbon footprint (e.g., +273 % for tomato) due to energy-intensive operations. Reducing facility carbon footprint requires energy decarbonization and improved irrigation and nutrient management. On average, carbon footprint, blue water footprint, acidification, eutrophication, human toxicity, and land use per kg of vegetables produced are estimated at 0.52 kg CO₂e, 0.08 m³, 2.73 g SO₂e, 2.37 g PO₄³−e, 0.14 kg 1,4‑DCBe, and 0.17 m² a. These quantitative benchmarks can support region-specific mitigation prioritization and inform policy and industry decisions for lower-impact vegetable supply chains. Geograpically, the compiled data skew toward Europe, and in terms of environmental impacts, concentrate on carbon footprint, highlighting the need for more diverse regional coverage and inclusion of non-carbon footprints.
蔬菜对可持续和健康的饮食至关重要,但它们在全球的环境足迹尚不清楚。本研究通过综合100项研究,对13种主要蔬菜的生命周期环境影响进行了定量综述。蔬菜产量和环境影响因类型、生产技术和全球地区而异。产量最高的蔬菜品种的中位数产量和环境影响分别是产量最低的蔬菜品种的40倍和5倍(例如356.0 vs. 8.4 t ha - 1; 0.86 vs. 0.17 kg CO₂e kg - 1)。与露天种植系统相比,设施种植系统通常具有更高的产量(例如,番茄产量为+ 548%)和更低的蓝水足迹(例如,生菜产量为- 75%),但由于能源密集型操作,碳足迹更高(例如,番茄产量为+ 273%)。减少设施碳足迹需要能源脱碳和改善灌溉和养分管理。平均而言,每公斤蔬菜生产的碳足迹、蓝水足迹、酸化、富营养化、人体毒性和土地利用估计为0.52公斤CO₂e、0.08 m³、2.73 g SO₂e、2.37 g PO₄³−e、0.14公斤1,4 - DCBe和0.17 m²a。这些定量基准可以支持特定区域的缓解优先级,并为低影响蔬菜供应链的政策和行业决策提供信息。从地理上看,汇编的数据倾向于欧洲,就环境影响而言,主要关注碳足迹,强调需要更多样化的区域覆盖和非碳足迹的纳入。
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.