Rachel E Busselman, Kendall Kellerman, Morgan Hamersky, Dustin J Stairs
{"title":"Cocaine and d-amphetamine self-administration under a differential reinforcement of low rates schedule of reinforcement in rats.","authors":"Rachel E Busselman, Kendall Kellerman, Morgan Hamersky, Dustin J Stairs","doi":"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stimulant misuse is strongly associated with behavioral impulsivity, including impairments in behavioral inhibition, yet few studies have examined drug self-administration in ways that directly assess inhibitory control. This study aimed to discover if intravenous (IV) self-administration of cocaine and d-amphetamine could be established using a differential reinforcement of low rates (DRL) schedule in rats and whether stimulant intake altered behavioral inhibition. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to lever press under DRL schedules with food reinforcement, then transitioned to IV cocaine (0.3 mg/kg/infusion) or d-amphetamine (0.06 mg/kg/infusion) self-administration sessions. Following the acquisition, full dose-effect curves were established with cocaine (DRL > 10 s) and d-amphetamine (DRL > 7 s), resulting in inverted- U -shaped curves for both active lever presses and infusions earned. The most active lever presses occurred at the second-highest dose for cocaine (0.3 mg/kg/infusion) and d-amphetamine (0.02 mg/kg/infusion). Analysis of cumulative probabilities of interresponse times (IRTs) revealed drug-specific effects on behavioral inhibition. At peak cocaine intake (0.1 mg/kg/infusion), approximately 65% of lever presses occurred before the DRL 10 s requirement, indicating a failure to inhibit responses. In contrast, at the highest (0.06 mg/kg/infusion) and lowest (0.006 mg/kg/infusion) doses of d-amphetamine self-administration, we observed increased long IRTs beyond the 300 s limited hold contingency, similar to saline. These findings demonstrate rats will self-administer stimulants under a DRL schedule, and cocaine and d-amphetamine differentially disrupt behavioral inhibition. This approach provides novel insight into the complex relationships between stimulant use and behavioral control and provides a foundation for future investigations into the mechanisms of behavioral inhibition.</p>","PeriodicalId":8832,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"12-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000869","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Stimulant misuse is strongly associated with behavioral impulsivity, including impairments in behavioral inhibition, yet few studies have examined drug self-administration in ways that directly assess inhibitory control. This study aimed to discover if intravenous (IV) self-administration of cocaine and d-amphetamine could be established using a differential reinforcement of low rates (DRL) schedule in rats and whether stimulant intake altered behavioral inhibition. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to lever press under DRL schedules with food reinforcement, then transitioned to IV cocaine (0.3 mg/kg/infusion) or d-amphetamine (0.06 mg/kg/infusion) self-administration sessions. Following the acquisition, full dose-effect curves were established with cocaine (DRL > 10 s) and d-amphetamine (DRL > 7 s), resulting in inverted- U -shaped curves for both active lever presses and infusions earned. The most active lever presses occurred at the second-highest dose for cocaine (0.3 mg/kg/infusion) and d-amphetamine (0.02 mg/kg/infusion). Analysis of cumulative probabilities of interresponse times (IRTs) revealed drug-specific effects on behavioral inhibition. At peak cocaine intake (0.1 mg/kg/infusion), approximately 65% of lever presses occurred before the DRL 10 s requirement, indicating a failure to inhibit responses. In contrast, at the highest (0.06 mg/kg/infusion) and lowest (0.006 mg/kg/infusion) doses of d-amphetamine self-administration, we observed increased long IRTs beyond the 300 s limited hold contingency, similar to saline. These findings demonstrate rats will self-administer stimulants under a DRL schedule, and cocaine and d-amphetamine differentially disrupt behavioral inhibition. This approach provides novel insight into the complex relationships between stimulant use and behavioral control and provides a foundation for future investigations into the mechanisms of behavioral inhibition.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Pharmacology accepts original full and short research reports in diverse areas ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Suitable topics include drug, chemical and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms under-lying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are welcome; however, studies reporting neurochemical data should have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies should not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems. Papers making a significant theoretical contribution are particularly welcome and, where possible and merited, space is made available for authors to explore fully the theoretical implications of their findings. Reviews of an area of the literature or at an appropriate stage in the development of an author’s own work are welcome. Commentaries in areas of current interest are also considered for publication, as are Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside behavioural pharmacology, but of importance and interest to behavioural pharmacologists. Behavioural Pharmacology publishes frequent Special Issues on current hot topics. The editors welcome correspondence about whether a paper in preparation might be suitable for inclusion in a Special Issue.