Long-term follow-up of implants placed after Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional autogenous bone grafts: a retrospective study.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
H Persson, C Östlund, L Rasmusson, J Walladbegi
{"title":"Long-term follow-up of implants placed after Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional autogenous bone grafts: a retrospective study.","authors":"H Persson, C Östlund, L Rasmusson, J Walladbegi","doi":"10.1186/s40729-025-00661-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral implantology has become a standard procedure for replacing missing teeth. However, patients with severe maxillary bone resorption often require complex surgical interventions, such as Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafting, prior to implant placement. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of oral implants placed following this surgical technique.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The present study was two-fold. First, a retrospective review was performed using medical records and conventional panoramic radiographs from 26 patients who had undergone Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafting and received either Astra Tech or Brånemark oral implants. Patients were followed for up to 5 years. Marginal bone loss was measured from the implant shoulder to the bone level. Implant survival and success rates were assessed, with success defined as bone loss of ≤ 2 mm during the first year and < 0.2 mm annually thereafter. Second, to assess the long-term outcomes of the two oral implant systems, all traceable patients were invited to undergo a follow-up radiographic examination up to 29 years post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combined survival rates for Astra Tech and Brånemark oral implants were 97.0%, 94.6%, and 94.1% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, with no additional implant loss observed by year 5. The overall success rate at 5 years was 56.1%, with Astra Tech implants showing a higher success rate (70.8%) compared to Brånemark implants (51.4%). Although there was no statistically significant difference in survival rates between the two systems, Astra Tech implants demonstrated significantly less marginal bone loss at both 1-year (p < 0.01) and 3-year (p = 0.021) follow-ups. For the long-term evaluation, 14 patients (54%) from the original cohort were traceable, of whom 4 patients (29%) participated in the follow-up. Among the 28 Brånemark implants assessed, none were lost, resulting in a 100% survival rate up to 29 years. The mean marginal bone loss of 2.6 ± 1.8 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafting, followed by oral implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation, appears to be a reliable long-term treatment option for patients with severe maxillary atrophy, demonstrating favorable long-term survival-, and success rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12705476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-025-00661-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral implantology has become a standard procedure for replacing missing teeth. However, patients with severe maxillary bone resorption often require complex surgical interventions, such as Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafting, prior to implant placement. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of oral implants placed following this surgical technique.

Patients and methods: The present study was two-fold. First, a retrospective review was performed using medical records and conventional panoramic radiographs from 26 patients who had undergone Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafting and received either Astra Tech or Brånemark oral implants. Patients were followed for up to 5 years. Marginal bone loss was measured from the implant shoulder to the bone level. Implant survival and success rates were assessed, with success defined as bone loss of ≤ 2 mm during the first year and < 0.2 mm annually thereafter. Second, to assess the long-term outcomes of the two oral implant systems, all traceable patients were invited to undergo a follow-up radiographic examination up to 29 years post-treatment.

Results: The combined survival rates for Astra Tech and Brånemark oral implants were 97.0%, 94.6%, and 94.1% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, with no additional implant loss observed by year 5. The overall success rate at 5 years was 56.1%, with Astra Tech implants showing a higher success rate (70.8%) compared to Brånemark implants (51.4%). Although there was no statistically significant difference in survival rates between the two systems, Astra Tech implants demonstrated significantly less marginal bone loss at both 1-year (p < 0.01) and 3-year (p = 0.021) follow-ups. For the long-term evaluation, 14 patients (54%) from the original cohort were traceable, of whom 4 patients (29%) participated in the follow-up. Among the 28 Brånemark implants assessed, none were lost, resulting in a 100% survival rate up to 29 years. The mean marginal bone loss of 2.6 ± 1.8 mm.

Conclusion: Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafting, followed by oral implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation, appears to be a reliable long-term treatment option for patients with severe maxillary atrophy, demonstrating favorable long-term survival-, and success rates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Le Fort I型截骨术后置入置入自体骨的长期随访:一项回顾性研究。
背景:口腔种植已经成为替代缺牙的标准方法。然而,上颌骨吸收严重的患者通常需要复杂的手术干预,如Le Fort I截骨术和间位植骨术,在植入种植体之前。本研究旨在评估该手术技术后口腔种植体的长期效果。患者和方法:本研究分为两部分。首先,对26例接受Le Fort I型截骨置入式植骨并接受Astra Tech或bramatnemark口腔种植体的患者的医疗记录和常规全景x线片进行回顾性分析。对患者进行了长达5年的随访。从种植体肩部到骨水平测量边缘骨丢失。评估种植体存活率和成功率,成功定义为第一年骨丢失≤2mm。结果:Astra Tech和bramatnemark口腔种植体在1年、2年和3年的联合生存率分别为97.0%、94.6%和94.1%,第5年未观察到额外的种植体丢失。5年的总体成功率为56.1%,其中Astra Tech种植体的成功率(70.8%)高于bramatnemark种植体(51.4%)。尽管两种系统的生存率没有统计学上的显著差异,但Astra Tech种植体在1年内的边际骨损失均显著减少(p)。结论:Le Fort I截骨与间位骨移植,随后进行口腔种植体植入和假体康复,似乎是严重上颌萎缩患者可靠的长期治疗选择,具有良好的长期生存率和成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
International Journal of Implant Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Implant Dentistry is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal is dedicated to promoting the exchange and discussion of all research areas relevant to implant dentistry in the form of systematic literature or invited reviews, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, clinical case reports, basic laboratory and animal research, and articles on material research and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书