Modified Versus Conventional Technique of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Rendezvous to Access the Narrow Bile Duct in Patients With Benign Biliary Diseases With Difficult Bile Duct Cannulation: A Comparative Feasibility Assessment Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jahnvi Dhar, Arup Choudhury, Megha Sharma, Sanjay Kumar, Pankaj Gupta, Cherring Tandup, Satish Subbiah Nagaraj, Saroj Kant Sinha, Takeshi Ogura, Jayanta Samanta
{"title":"Modified Versus Conventional Technique of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Rendezvous to Access the Narrow Bile Duct in Patients With Benign Biliary Diseases With Difficult Bile Duct Cannulation: A Comparative Feasibility Assessment Study.","authors":"Jahnvi Dhar, Arup Choudhury, Megha Sharma, Sanjay Kumar, Pankaj Gupta, Cherring Tandup, Satish Subbiah Nagaraj, Saroj Kant Sinha, Takeshi Ogura, Jayanta Samanta","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extrahepatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous (EUS-RV) with narrow common bile duct (CBD), as encountered in benign biliary diseases, can be technically challenging. We evaluated its modification (no aspiration, no contrast) in this difficult clinical scenario.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EUS-RV using conventional versus modified technique in patients with benign diseases and narrow CBD (≤ 6 mm) with difficult biliary cannulation (European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy definition) was evaluated. The primary outcome was technical success, and secondary outcomes were overall EUS-RV core time, radiation dose, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 113 patients were evaluated (conventional 49; modified 64). The modified EUS-RV had numerically higher technical success (83.7% vs. 95.3%; p = 0.05), which was significantly higher when the CBD access diameter was ≤ 3 mm (61.1% vs. 96.9%; p = 0.002). Moreover, the modified EUS-RV had shorter total core EUS-RV time (median 10 vs. 6.12 min; p < 0.001) and overall radiation exposure (median 345 vs. 208.93 mGy; p < 0.001), with comparable overall adverse events. On multivariate analysis, the predictors for technical success were the use of the modified technique (aOR: 6.26; p = 0.02) and CBD access diameter (aOR: 5.56; p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modified EUS-RV technique enables efficient and rapid biliary access in cases of narrowed CBD without the need for contrast injection and bile aspiration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"312-321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.70051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extrahepatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous (EUS-RV) with narrow common bile duct (CBD), as encountered in benign biliary diseases, can be technically challenging. We evaluated its modification (no aspiration, no contrast) in this difficult clinical scenario.

Methods: EUS-RV using conventional versus modified technique in patients with benign diseases and narrow CBD (≤ 6 mm) with difficult biliary cannulation (European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy definition) was evaluated. The primary outcome was technical success, and secondary outcomes were overall EUS-RV core time, radiation dose, and adverse events.

Results: Overall, 113 patients were evaluated (conventional 49; modified 64). The modified EUS-RV had numerically higher technical success (83.7% vs. 95.3%; p = 0.05), which was significantly higher when the CBD access diameter was ≤ 3 mm (61.1% vs. 96.9%; p = 0.002). Moreover, the modified EUS-RV had shorter total core EUS-RV time (median 10 vs. 6.12 min; p < 0.001) and overall radiation exposure (median 345 vs. 208.93 mGy; p < 0.001), with comparable overall adverse events. On multivariate analysis, the predictors for technical success were the use of the modified technique (aOR: 6.26; p = 0.02) and CBD access diameter (aOR: 5.56; p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Modified EUS-RV technique enables efficient and rapid biliary access in cases of narrowed CBD without the need for contrast injection and bile aspiration.

超声内镜引导下进入狭窄胆道的改良技术与传统技术在胆道插管困难的良性胆道疾病患者中的比较可行性评估研究
背景:在良性胆道疾病中,肝外超声内镜引导狭窄胆总管交会(EUS-RV)在技术上具有挑战性。在这种困难的临床情况下,我们评估了其改良(无吸痰,无对比)。方法:对良性疾病和狭窄CBD(≤6 mm)且胆道插管困难(欧洲胃肠内镜学会定义)的患者采用常规EUS-RV与改良技术进行评估。主要结局是技术成功,次要结局是总EUS-RV核心时间、辐射剂量和不良事件。结果:总共评估了113例患者(常规49例,改良64例)。改良EUS-RV在数值上具有更高的技术成功率(83.7% vs. 95.3%, p = 0.05),当CBD通路直径≤3 mm时,技术成功率显著提高(61.1% vs. 96.9%, p = 0.002)。此外,改良的EUS-RV具有更短的总核心EUS-RV时间(中位数10 vs. 6.12 min; p)。结论:改良的EUS-RV技术可以在CBD狭窄的情况下实现有效和快速的胆道通路,而无需注射造影剂和胆汁吸入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书