Methodologies Employed in Economic Evaluation of Suicide Prevention Interventions: A Scoping Review

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Linda Ryen, Elin Vimefall
{"title":"Methodologies Employed in Economic Evaluation of Suicide Prevention Interventions: A Scoping Review","authors":"Linda Ryen,&nbsp;Elin Vimefall","doi":"10.1007/s10488-025-01481-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Economic evaluations can be a powerful tool to assist policymakers in prioritizing interventions to reduce the number of suicides. However, the number of economic evaluations of suicide prevention is low and their quality vary. The aim of this paper is to review the literature on economic evaluations for suicide prevention, specifically focusing on the methods used to measure and value the effect of interventions. To identify articles, we searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus for the period from 2000 to 2023. Since the aim was to investigate how a reduction in the number of suicides is measured and valued when evaluating suicide prevention interventions, we only included studies containing effects on mortality. In total 560 unique hits were identified. Most studies were excluded after the first screening of abstracts and titles. The most common reason for exclusion was that the study did not evaluate an intervention for suicide prevention. The final analysis included 16 studies. The number of economic evaluations of suicide prevention is still low, but there is a positive trend and methodological improvements have been made. Nevertheless, several areas where more research is needed were identified, regarding both how to measure and value the effect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":"53 1","pages":"64 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10488-025-01481-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-025-01481-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Economic evaluations can be a powerful tool to assist policymakers in prioritizing interventions to reduce the number of suicides. However, the number of economic evaluations of suicide prevention is low and their quality vary. The aim of this paper is to review the literature on economic evaluations for suicide prevention, specifically focusing on the methods used to measure and value the effect of interventions. To identify articles, we searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus for the period from 2000 to 2023. Since the aim was to investigate how a reduction in the number of suicides is measured and valued when evaluating suicide prevention interventions, we only included studies containing effects on mortality. In total 560 unique hits were identified. Most studies were excluded after the first screening of abstracts and titles. The most common reason for exclusion was that the study did not evaluate an intervention for suicide prevention. The final analysis included 16 studies. The number of economic evaluations of suicide prevention is still low, but there is a positive trend and methodological improvements have been made. Nevertheless, several areas where more research is needed were identified, regarding both how to measure and value the effect.

自杀预防干预的经济评估方法:范围回顾。
经济评估可以成为一个强有力的工具,帮助决策者确定减少自杀人数的干预措施的优先次序。然而,自杀预防的经济评价数量少,质量参差不齐。本文的目的是回顾有关自杀预防经济评估的文献,特别关注用于测量和评估干预措施效果的方法。为了确定文章,我们检索了2000年至2023年期间的PubMed, Web of Science和Scopus。由于目的是调查在评估自杀预防干预措施时如何衡量和评估自杀数量的减少,因此我们只纳入了对死亡率有影响的研究。总共确定了560个独特的点击。大多数研究在第一次筛选摘要和标题后被排除。最常见的排除原因是该研究没有评估预防自杀的干预措施。最终的分析包括16项研究。预防自杀的经济评估的数量仍然很低,但有一个积极的趋势和方法上的改进。然而,在如何衡量和评价影响方面,确定了需要进行更多研究的几个领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书