Intelligent data collection for reducing network structure uncertainty in material flow analysis using Bayesian optimal experimental design

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jiankan Liao, Xun Huan, Daniel Cooper
{"title":"Intelligent data collection for reducing network structure uncertainty in material flow analysis using Bayesian optimal experimental design","authors":"Jiankan Liao,&nbsp;Xun Huan,&nbsp;Daniel Cooper","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Material flow analyses (MFAs) are powerful tools for highlighting resource efficiency opportunities in supply chains. MFAs are often represented as directed graphs, with nodes denoting processes and edges representing mass flows. However, network structure uncertainty—uncertainty in the presence or absence of flows between nodes—is common and can compromise flow predictions. While collection of more MFA data can reduce network structure uncertainty, an intelligent data acquisition strategy is crucial to optimize the resources (person-hours and money spent on collecting and purchasing data) invested in constructing an MFA. In this study, we apply Bayesian optimal experimental design, based on the Kullback–Leibler divergence, to efficiently target high-utility MFA data—data that minimizes network structure uncertainty. We introduce a new method with reduced bias for estimating expected utility, demonstrating its superior accuracy over traditional approaches. We illustrate these advances with a case study on the US steel sector MFA, where the expected utility of collecting specific single pieces of steel mass flow data aligns with the actual reduction in network structure uncertainty achieved by collecting said data from the United States Geological Survey and the World Steel Association. The results highlight that the optimal MFA data to collect depends on the total amount of data being gathered, making it sensitive to the scale of the data collection effort. Overall, our methods support intelligent data acquisition strategies, accelerating uncertainty reduction in MFAs and enhancing their utility for impact quantification and informed decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 6","pages":"2005-2023"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Material flow analyses (MFAs) are powerful tools for highlighting resource efficiency opportunities in supply chains. MFAs are often represented as directed graphs, with nodes denoting processes and edges representing mass flows. However, network structure uncertainty—uncertainty in the presence or absence of flows between nodes—is common and can compromise flow predictions. While collection of more MFA data can reduce network structure uncertainty, an intelligent data acquisition strategy is crucial to optimize the resources (person-hours and money spent on collecting and purchasing data) invested in constructing an MFA. In this study, we apply Bayesian optimal experimental design, based on the Kullback–Leibler divergence, to efficiently target high-utility MFA data—data that minimizes network structure uncertainty. We introduce a new method with reduced bias for estimating expected utility, demonstrating its superior accuracy over traditional approaches. We illustrate these advances with a case study on the US steel sector MFA, where the expected utility of collecting specific single pieces of steel mass flow data aligns with the actual reduction in network structure uncertainty achieved by collecting said data from the United States Geological Survey and the World Steel Association. The results highlight that the optimal MFA data to collect depends on the total amount of data being gathered, making it sensitive to the scale of the data collection effort. Overall, our methods support intelligent data acquisition strategies, accelerating uncertainty reduction in MFAs and enhancing their utility for impact quantification and informed decision-making.

Abstract Image

基于贝叶斯优化实验设计的智能数据采集降低了物流分析中网络结构的不确定性
物料流分析(MFAs)是强调供应链中资源效率机会的强大工具。mfa通常表示为有向图,节点表示过程,边缘表示质量流。然而,网络结构的不确定性——节点之间存在或不存在流量的不确定性——是常见的,并且会损害流量预测。虽然收集更多的MFA数据可以减少网络结构的不确定性,但智能数据采集策略对于优化用于构建MFA的资源(用于收集和购买数据的人力和金钱)至关重要。在本研究中,我们应用基于Kullback-Leibler散度的贝叶斯最优实验设计,有效地针对高效用的MFA数据——最小化网络结构不确定性的数据。我们介绍了一种新的方法与减少偏差估计期望效用,证明其优于传统方法的准确性。我们通过对美国钢铁行业MFA的案例研究来说明这些进展,在该案例中,通过收集美国地质调查局和世界钢铁协会的数据,收集特定单件钢铁质量流量数据的预期效用与实际减少网络结构不确定性相一致。结果表明,要收集的最佳MFA数据取决于所收集的数据总量,这使得它对数据收集工作的规模很敏感。总体而言,我们的方法支持智能数据采集策略,加速mfa的不确定性降低,并增强其对影响量化和知情决策的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书