Health coverage and farmworker productivity

IF 4.9 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Zachariah Rutledge, Timothy J. Richards, John D. Lowrey
{"title":"Health coverage and farmworker productivity","authors":"Zachariah Rutledge,&nbsp;Timothy J. Richards,&nbsp;John D. Lowrey","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Farmworkers are often subject to hazardous working conditions, experience a disparity in health insurance coverage, and are vulnerable to chronic health conditions and injury. Although recent health care mandates have improved access to healthcare, many agricultural employers still do not offer coverage for their employees. Because farmworkers tend to be seasonal, and sometimes migratory, worker health is often considered a common property resource. If farmers cannot retain the benefits due to offering worker healthcare coverage, the market for firm-provided coverage fails and workers are not covered. We estimate the economic value of offering health coverage to farmworkers and their employers using a structural search, match, and bargaining model. We find that farmworkers with employer-provided health coverage are significantly more productive than those without and, on average, generate an additional <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mtext>$</mtext>\n <mn>0.85</mn>\n </mrow></math> in economic surplus for each hour worked. Employers who offer health coverage retain an additional <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mtext>$</mtext>\n <mn>0.65</mn>\n </mrow></math> of economic surplus for each hour of work performed by their employees due to a health productivity premium, after accounting for the cost of offering insurance. Farmworker healthcare coverage, therefore, is not a common property resource and represents a viable strategy to attract, retain, and care for valuable employees.</p>","PeriodicalId":55537,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"108 1","pages":"309-335"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajae.12538","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.12538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farmworkers are often subject to hazardous working conditions, experience a disparity in health insurance coverage, and are vulnerable to chronic health conditions and injury. Although recent health care mandates have improved access to healthcare, many agricultural employers still do not offer coverage for their employees. Because farmworkers tend to be seasonal, and sometimes migratory, worker health is often considered a common property resource. If farmers cannot retain the benefits due to offering worker healthcare coverage, the market for firm-provided coverage fails and workers are not covered. We estimate the economic value of offering health coverage to farmworkers and their employers using a structural search, match, and bargaining model. We find that farmworkers with employer-provided health coverage are significantly more productive than those without and, on average, generate an additional $ 0.85 in economic surplus for each hour worked. Employers who offer health coverage retain an additional $ 0.65 of economic surplus for each hour of work performed by their employees due to a health productivity premium, after accounting for the cost of offering insurance. Farmworker healthcare coverage, therefore, is not a common property resource and represents a viable strategy to attract, retain, and care for valuable employees.

Abstract Image

医疗保险和农场工人生产率
农场工人往往处于危险的工作条件下,在健康保险覆盖面方面存在差距,并且容易患上慢性疾病和受伤。尽管最近的医疗保健规定改善了获得医疗保健的机会,但许多农业雇主仍然不为其雇员提供保险。由于农场工人往往是季节性的,有时是迁移的,工人的健康通常被认为是一种共同的财产资源。如果农民因向工人提供医疗保险而无法保留福利,那么企业提供保险的市场就失效了,工人也就得不到保险。我们使用结构搜索、匹配和议价模型来估计向农场工人及其雇主提供医疗保险的经济价值。我们发现,拥有雇主提供的医疗保险的农场工人的生产力明显高于没有医疗保险的农场工人,平均而言,每工作一小时可产生0.85美元的额外经济盈余。在考虑到提供保险的成本后,提供健康保险的雇主每工作一小时可额外获得0.65美元的经济盈余,因为健康生产力溢价。因此,农场工人的医疗保险不是一种共同的财产资源,而是一种吸引、留住和照顾有价值员工的可行策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Agricultural Economics provides a forum for creative and scholarly work on the economics of agriculture and food, natural resources and the environment, and rural and community development throughout the world. Papers should relate to one of these areas, should have a problem orientation, and should demonstrate originality and innovation in analysis, methods, or application. Analyses of problems pertinent to research, extension, and teaching are equally encouraged, as is interdisciplinary research with a significant economic component. Review articles that offer a comprehensive and insightful survey of a relevant subject, consistent with the scope of the Journal as discussed above, will also be considered. All articles published, regardless of their nature, will be held to the same set of scholarly standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书