Zachariah Rutledge, Timothy J. Richards, John D. Lowrey
{"title":"Health coverage and farmworker productivity","authors":"Zachariah Rutledge, Timothy J. Richards, John D. Lowrey","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Farmworkers are often subject to hazardous working conditions, experience a disparity in health insurance coverage, and are vulnerable to chronic health conditions and injury. Although recent health care mandates have improved access to healthcare, many agricultural employers still do not offer coverage for their employees. Because farmworkers tend to be seasonal, and sometimes migratory, worker health is often considered a common property resource. If farmers cannot retain the benefits due to offering worker healthcare coverage, the market for firm-provided coverage fails and workers are not covered. We estimate the economic value of offering health coverage to farmworkers and their employers using a structural search, match, and bargaining model. We find that farmworkers with employer-provided health coverage are significantly more productive than those without and, on average, generate an additional <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mtext>$</mtext>\n <mn>0.85</mn>\n </mrow></math> in economic surplus for each hour worked. Employers who offer health coverage retain an additional <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mtext>$</mtext>\n <mn>0.65</mn>\n </mrow></math> of economic surplus for each hour of work performed by their employees due to a health productivity premium, after accounting for the cost of offering insurance. Farmworker healthcare coverage, therefore, is not a common property resource and represents a viable strategy to attract, retain, and care for valuable employees.</p>","PeriodicalId":55537,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"108 1","pages":"309-335"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajae.12538","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.12538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Farmworkers are often subject to hazardous working conditions, experience a disparity in health insurance coverage, and are vulnerable to chronic health conditions and injury. Although recent health care mandates have improved access to healthcare, many agricultural employers still do not offer coverage for their employees. Because farmworkers tend to be seasonal, and sometimes migratory, worker health is often considered a common property resource. If farmers cannot retain the benefits due to offering worker healthcare coverage, the market for firm-provided coverage fails and workers are not covered. We estimate the economic value of offering health coverage to farmworkers and their employers using a structural search, match, and bargaining model. We find that farmworkers with employer-provided health coverage are significantly more productive than those without and, on average, generate an additional in economic surplus for each hour worked. Employers who offer health coverage retain an additional of economic surplus for each hour of work performed by their employees due to a health productivity premium, after accounting for the cost of offering insurance. Farmworker healthcare coverage, therefore, is not a common property resource and represents a viable strategy to attract, retain, and care for valuable employees.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Agricultural Economics provides a forum for creative and scholarly work on the economics of agriculture and food, natural resources and the environment, and rural and community development throughout the world. Papers should relate to one of these areas, should have a problem orientation, and should demonstrate originality and innovation in analysis, methods, or application. Analyses of problems pertinent to research, extension, and teaching are equally encouraged, as is interdisciplinary research with a significant economic component. Review articles that offer a comprehensive and insightful survey of a relevant subject, consistent with the scope of the Journal as discussed above, will also be considered. All articles published, regardless of their nature, will be held to the same set of scholarly standards.