Exploring the low-carbon development model for a hazardous waste treatment park from a life cycle assessment perspective

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Chenqi Gao, Yating Niu, Xinran Du, Runze Zhu, Rongxing Bian, Ya'nan Wang, Yingjie Sun, Weihua Li, Qingjian Zhang, Huilai Chen
{"title":"Exploring the low-carbon development model for a hazardous waste treatment park from a life cycle assessment perspective","authors":"Chenqi Gao,&nbsp;Yating Niu,&nbsp;Xinran Du,&nbsp;Runze Zhu,&nbsp;Rongxing Bian,&nbsp;Ya'nan Wang,&nbsp;Yingjie Sun,&nbsp;Weihua Li,&nbsp;Qingjian Zhang,&nbsp;Huilai Chen","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>China is actively committed to mitigating carbon emissions through its “Dual Carbon” and “Zero-Waste Cities” strategies. Hazardous waste (HW) treatment, a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, plays a crucial role in achieving carbon reduction targets. This study systematically assessed the carbon emissions and low-carbon pathways of a representative multi-HW treatment park in Qingdao using life cycle assessment and life cycle cost methodologies. In 2020, the total net GHG emissions of the HW park were 49,669.3 t CO<sub>2</sub>-eq, with an average emission intensity of 1181.1 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq per tonne of HW. Among the various treatment systems, medical waste (MW) incineration exhibited the highest GHG emission intensity (1377.6 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/t MW), followed by industrial hazardous waste (IHW) incineration (1076.4 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/t IHW), fly ash/slag treatment (9.7 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/t HW), and physicochemical treatment (8.5 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/t HW). Three integrated low-carbon pathways demonstrated that utilizing waste heat for heating exhibited the highest carbon mitigation potential, achieving up to −403.6 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/t IHW, followed by technological improvement and resource recycling. The combined low-carbon scenario could achieve a 49.5% reduction in total carbon emissions compared to the baseline scenario. Furthermore, economic performance improved, with treatment benefits increasing from 3431.3 RMB/t IHW to 3948.5 RMB/t IHW due to enhanced energy efficiency and resource recovery. This study provides a framework for assessing multi-HW parks’ carbon footprints and offers strategic insights for low-carbon, resource-efficient waste management. The findings also support sustainable multi-HW management and contribute to climate and decarbonization efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 6","pages":"2068-2081"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China is actively committed to mitigating carbon emissions through its “Dual Carbon” and “Zero-Waste Cities” strategies. Hazardous waste (HW) treatment, a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, plays a crucial role in achieving carbon reduction targets. This study systematically assessed the carbon emissions and low-carbon pathways of a representative multi-HW treatment park in Qingdao using life cycle assessment and life cycle cost methodologies. In 2020, the total net GHG emissions of the HW park were 49,669.3 t CO2-eq, with an average emission intensity of 1181.1 kg CO2-eq per tonne of HW. Among the various treatment systems, medical waste (MW) incineration exhibited the highest GHG emission intensity (1377.6 kg CO2-eq/t MW), followed by industrial hazardous waste (IHW) incineration (1076.4 kg CO2-eq/t IHW), fly ash/slag treatment (9.7 kg CO2-eq/t HW), and physicochemical treatment (8.5 kg CO2-eq/t HW). Three integrated low-carbon pathways demonstrated that utilizing waste heat for heating exhibited the highest carbon mitigation potential, achieving up to −403.6 kg CO2-eq/t IHW, followed by technological improvement and resource recycling. The combined low-carbon scenario could achieve a 49.5% reduction in total carbon emissions compared to the baseline scenario. Furthermore, economic performance improved, with treatment benefits increasing from 3431.3 RMB/t IHW to 3948.5 RMB/t IHW due to enhanced energy efficiency and resource recovery. This study provides a framework for assessing multi-HW parks’ carbon footprints and offers strategic insights for low-carbon, resource-efficient waste management. The findings also support sustainable multi-HW management and contribute to climate and decarbonization efforts.

基于生命周期评价视角的危险废物处理园区低碳发展模式探索
中国通过“双碳”和“零废城市”战略,积极致力于减少碳排放。危险废物(HW)处理是温室气体(GHG)排放的重要来源,在实现碳减排目标方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究采用生命周期评价和生命周期成本方法,对青岛市具有代表性的多污水处理园区的碳排放和低碳路径进行了系统评估。2020年HW园区温室气体净排放总量为49,669.3 t CO2-eq,平均排放强度为1181.1 kg CO2-eq / t HW。在不同的处理系统中,医疗废物(MW)焚烧的温室气体排放强度最高(1377.6 kg co2 -当量/t MW),其次是工业危险废物(IHW)焚烧(1076.4 kg co2 -当量/t IHW)、粉煤灰/炉渣处理(9.7 kg co2 -当量/t HW)和物化处理(8.5 kg co2 -当量/t HW)。三种综合低碳途径表明,利用废热供热具有最大的碳减排潜力,达到- 403.6 kg co2当量/吨IHW,其次是技术改进和资源回收。与基线情景相比,综合低碳情景可实现碳排放总量减少49.5%。此外,由于能源效率和资源回收率的提高,经济效益得到改善,治理效益从3431.3元/t IHW增加到3948.5元/t IHW。本研究提供了一个评估多园区碳足迹的框架,并为低碳、资源高效的废物管理提供了战略见解。研究结果还支持可持续的多人力资源管理,并有助于气候和脱碳工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书