Hemispheric dominance for scene perception differs across different components of the navigation network

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Vision Research Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2025.108731
David P. Carey , Emma M. Karlsson , Leah T. Johnstone
{"title":"Hemispheric dominance for scene perception differs across different components of the navigation network","authors":"David P. Carey ,&nbsp;Emma M. Karlsson ,&nbsp;Leah T. Johnstone","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2025.108731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Patients who develop difficulties in orienting in familiar environments have been well-described in neurology and neuropsychology. This topographical disorientation, when it occurs, follows damage to occipitotemporal regions of the brain. The lesions are often bilateral, but when they are one-sided, disorientation is much more likely to follow from damage to the right hemisphere. However, the evidence from the neuroimaging literature on scene perception and spatial navigation rarely refers to cerebral dominance favoring the right hemisphere. This contradiction is in part explained by how threshold-dependent methods in neuroimaging are often not well suited for visualizing let alone quantifying brain asymmetry. In the present investigation, brain asymmetries for scene perception are quantified in a large sample, enriched with non-right-handed participants who are more heterogeneous for brain asymmetries. Results show a weak but consistent right hemispheric bias. A planned region of interest analysis provided only weak support for models of differential lateralization of perceptual and semantic nodes within the scene network. Surprisingly, right dominance was most prominent in retrosplenial cortex, contrary to models that suggest it functions in semantic/mnemonic rather than perceptual domains. Results are discussed in terms of the utility of such an approach for elucidating the functional nature of different scene network subregions, and how publicly-available datasets will prove exceptionally useful for doing so.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 108731"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698925001920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients who develop difficulties in orienting in familiar environments have been well-described in neurology and neuropsychology. This topographical disorientation, when it occurs, follows damage to occipitotemporal regions of the brain. The lesions are often bilateral, but when they are one-sided, disorientation is much more likely to follow from damage to the right hemisphere. However, the evidence from the neuroimaging literature on scene perception and spatial navigation rarely refers to cerebral dominance favoring the right hemisphere. This contradiction is in part explained by how threshold-dependent methods in neuroimaging are often not well suited for visualizing let alone quantifying brain asymmetry. In the present investigation, brain asymmetries for scene perception are quantified in a large sample, enriched with non-right-handed participants who are more heterogeneous for brain asymmetries. Results show a weak but consistent right hemispheric bias. A planned region of interest analysis provided only weak support for models of differential lateralization of perceptual and semantic nodes within the scene network. Surprisingly, right dominance was most prominent in retrosplenial cortex, contrary to models that suggest it functions in semantic/mnemonic rather than perceptual domains. Results are discussed in terms of the utility of such an approach for elucidating the functional nature of different scene network subregions, and how publicly-available datasets will prove exceptionally useful for doing so.
在导航网络的不同组成部分中,场景感知的半球优势是不同的
在神经病学和神经心理学中,对在熟悉环境中出现定向困难的患者进行了很好的描述。这种地形定向障碍,当它发生时,是随着大脑枕颞区的损伤而发生的。病变通常是双侧的,但当病变是单侧的,定向障碍更可能是右半球损伤引起的。然而,关于场景感知和空间导航的神经影像学文献证据很少涉及大脑的右半球优势。这种矛盾在一定程度上可以解释为神经成像中依赖阈值的方法通常不太适合可视化,更不用说量化大脑的不对称性了。在本研究中,我们在一个大样本中量化了场景感知的大脑不对称,丰富了非右撇子参与者,他们在大脑不对称方面更具异质性。结果显示轻微但一致的右半球偏倚。计划的兴趣区域分析仅为场景网络中感知和语义节点的差异侧化模型提供了微弱的支持。令人惊讶的是,右主导权在脾后皮层最为突出,这与认为它在语义/助记而不是感知领域起作用的模型相反。结果讨论了这种方法在阐明不同场景网络子区域的功能性质方面的效用,以及如何公开可用的数据集将证明对这样做非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vision Research
Vision Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书