{"title":"Realized spatial accessibility vs. potential spatial accessibility in the United States: A case study based on geospatial big data","authors":"Yaxiong Shao , Wei Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2025.102382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic drew significant attention to disparities in spatial access to healthcare. While potential spatial accessibility has been extensively researched, realized spatial accessibility remains relatively underexplored. This study employs geospatial big data (SafeGraph Monthly Pattern) to explore the differences between these two types of spatial accessibility using the Two-step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) model for the entire population at the Census Tract Level across the contiguous United States. By integrating methods such as point of interest (POI) Placekey matching, Partial Placekey, and fuzzy matching, we successfully matched SafeGraph foot traffic patterns with the American Hospital Association (AHA) survey dataset. Employing total beds as a representation of healthcare facility supply and adjusted SafeGraph visit counts as a representation of the actual healthcare service utilization, the 2SFCA model was applied to compute realized spatial accessibility. A distance decay function, derived from SafeGraph foot traffic patterns, and the same supply data along with potential demand populations were incorporated to calculate potential spatial accessibility. Results show significant differences between potential and realized spatial accessibility across the contiguous US. Compared to realized accessibility measure, the potential spatial accessibility measure significantly underestimates the spatial access to healthcare. Our approach suggests that the realized accessibility based on SafeGraph data can not only help policymakers in making more informed decisions but also serve as a catalyst in improving health access equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48241,"journal":{"name":"Computers Environment and Urban Systems","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 102382"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers Environment and Urban Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0198971525001358","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic drew significant attention to disparities in spatial access to healthcare. While potential spatial accessibility has been extensively researched, realized spatial accessibility remains relatively underexplored. This study employs geospatial big data (SafeGraph Monthly Pattern) to explore the differences between these two types of spatial accessibility using the Two-step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) model for the entire population at the Census Tract Level across the contiguous United States. By integrating methods such as point of interest (POI) Placekey matching, Partial Placekey, and fuzzy matching, we successfully matched SafeGraph foot traffic patterns with the American Hospital Association (AHA) survey dataset. Employing total beds as a representation of healthcare facility supply and adjusted SafeGraph visit counts as a representation of the actual healthcare service utilization, the 2SFCA model was applied to compute realized spatial accessibility. A distance decay function, derived from SafeGraph foot traffic patterns, and the same supply data along with potential demand populations were incorporated to calculate potential spatial accessibility. Results show significant differences between potential and realized spatial accessibility across the contiguous US. Compared to realized accessibility measure, the potential spatial accessibility measure significantly underestimates the spatial access to healthcare. Our approach suggests that the realized accessibility based on SafeGraph data can not only help policymakers in making more informed decisions but also serve as a catalyst in improving health access equity.
期刊介绍:
Computers, Environment and Urban Systemsis an interdisciplinary journal publishing cutting-edge and innovative computer-based research on environmental and urban systems, that privileges the geospatial perspective. The journal welcomes original high quality scholarship of a theoretical, applied or technological nature, and provides a stimulating presentation of perspectives, research developments, overviews of important new technologies and uses of major computational, information-based, and visualization innovations. Applied and theoretical contributions demonstrate the scope of computer-based analysis fostering a better understanding of environmental and urban systems, their spatial scope and their dynamics.