AI literacy for safe deployment: Cross-national evidence on the interaction between talent and governance

IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Telecommunications Policy Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103106
Jeong-Ah Park , Chang Hyun Kim , Hye-Jin Kim
{"title":"AI literacy for safe deployment: Cross-national evidence on the interaction between talent and governance","authors":"Jeong-Ah Park ,&nbsp;Chang Hyun Kim ,&nbsp;Hye-Jin Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how national AI literacy and its operating environment jointly shape the frequency of AI-related incidents and hazards across countries. Drawing on cross-national panel data from 62 countries between 2014 and 2024, we integrate AI incident reports from the OECD AI Incidents Monitor with indicators from the Tortoise Global AI Index. AI literacy is proxied by the AI Talent Index, capturing the human capital available for AI development and deployment, while the AI Operating Environment Index reflects institutional and regulatory conditions supporting responsible AI use. Using a correlated random effects negative binomial model, we find that countries with higher AI literacy are associated with higher expected counts of reported AI-related incidents, consistent with greater exposure and capture. However, this relationship is significantly mitigated in countries with more mature operating environments. The interaction between AI talent and governance demonstrates a complementary risk-mitigation effect: in environments with robust safeguards, higher AI literacy leads to lower expected incident counts compared to environments with high literacy but weak governance. These findings suggest that building human capital without adequate governance may increase societal risk, and that effective AI policy must align investments in talent with regulatory infrastructure. Our results underscore the need for integrated national strategies to promote both capability and accountability in the era of rapidly advancing AI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22290,"journal":{"name":"Telecommunications Policy","volume":"50 1","pages":"Article 103106"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telecommunications Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596125002034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how national AI literacy and its operating environment jointly shape the frequency of AI-related incidents and hazards across countries. Drawing on cross-national panel data from 62 countries between 2014 and 2024, we integrate AI incident reports from the OECD AI Incidents Monitor with indicators from the Tortoise Global AI Index. AI literacy is proxied by the AI Talent Index, capturing the human capital available for AI development and deployment, while the AI Operating Environment Index reflects institutional and regulatory conditions supporting responsible AI use. Using a correlated random effects negative binomial model, we find that countries with higher AI literacy are associated with higher expected counts of reported AI-related incidents, consistent with greater exposure and capture. However, this relationship is significantly mitigated in countries with more mature operating environments. The interaction between AI talent and governance demonstrates a complementary risk-mitigation effect: in environments with robust safeguards, higher AI literacy leads to lower expected incident counts compared to environments with high literacy but weak governance. These findings suggest that building human capital without adequate governance may increase societal risk, and that effective AI policy must align investments in talent with regulatory infrastructure. Our results underscore the need for integrated national strategies to promote both capability and accountability in the era of rapidly advancing AI.
安全部署的人工智能素养:人才与治理之间相互作用的跨国证据
本研究调查了各国的人工智能素养及其运行环境如何共同影响各国人工智能相关事件和危害的频率。根据2014年至2024年间来自62个国家的跨国面板数据,我们将经合组织人工智能事件监测的人工智能事件报告与乌龟全球人工智能指数的指标相结合。人工智能素养由人工智能人才指数代表,该指数反映了可用于人工智能开发和部署的人力资本,而人工智能运营环境指数反映了支持负责任地使用人工智能的制度和监管条件。使用相关随机效应负二项模型,我们发现人工智能素养较高的国家报告的人工智能相关事件的预期数量较高,这与更多的曝光和捕获相一致。然而,在经营环境较为成熟的国家,这种关系明显减弱。人工智能人才和治理之间的相互作用表明了一种互补的风险缓解效应:在具有强大保障措施的环境中,与具有高素养但治理薄弱的环境相比,较高的人工智能素养会导致较低的预期事件计数。这些研究结果表明,在没有适当治理的情况下建设人力资本可能会增加社会风险,有效的人工智能政策必须使人才投资与监管基础设施保持一致。我们的研究结果强调,在人工智能快速发展的时代,需要制定综合的国家战略,以促进能力和问责制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Telecommunications Policy
Telecommunications Policy 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
122
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Telecommunications Policy is concerned with the impact of digitalization in the economy and society. The journal is multidisciplinary, encompassing conceptual, theoretical and empirical studies, quantitative as well as qualitative. The scope includes policy, regulation, and governance; big data, artificial intelligence and data science; new and traditional sectors encompassing new media and the platform economy; management, entrepreneurship, innovation and use. Contributions may explore these topics at national, regional and international levels, including issues confronting both developed and developing countries. The papers accepted by the journal meet high standards of analytical rigor and policy relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书