7 - A Corrective technique for transverse maxillary deficiency: MARPE or SARPE?

IF 3.5 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Manal Sabour , Meryem Bellamine , Ihsane Benyahya
{"title":"7 - A Corrective technique for transverse maxillary deficiency: MARPE or SARPE?","authors":"Manal Sabour ,&nbsp;Meryem Bellamine ,&nbsp;Ihsane Benyahya","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transverse maxillary deficiency (TMD) is characterized by a constricted maxilla, leading to functional and aesthetic issues. It typically involves maxillary expansion to improve occlusion and facial harmony. Among the available methods, Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (SARPE) and Mini- screw Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE) are two primary techniques used for correcting TMD, particularly in adult patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This systematic review aims to compare indications, advantages, limitations, and clinical outcomes of both techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The research was carried out across 3 scientific databases: PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were selectively screened for relevance, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The quality assessment of studies was performed using the RISK-OF-BIAS 2 tool for randomized trials and ROBINS-I for cohort studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>MARPE is ideal for moderate deficiencies in younger patients with partially fused sutures, non-surgical nature allows for quicker recovery and fewer complications . Whereas SARPE is preferred for severe deficiencies in adults with fully fused sutures. highly effective for complex cases, requiring surgery, longer recovery time and higher costs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ultimately, The choice between MARPE and SARPE should be individualized, based on a thorough evaluation of the patient’s clinical condition, age, and treatment goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":"14 6","pages":"Page 399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212443825000669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Transverse maxillary deficiency (TMD) is characterized by a constricted maxilla, leading to functional and aesthetic issues. It typically involves maxillary expansion to improve occlusion and facial harmony. Among the available methods, Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (SARPE) and Mini- screw Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE) are two primary techniques used for correcting TMD, particularly in adult patients.

Objectives

This systematic review aims to compare indications, advantages, limitations, and clinical outcomes of both techniques.

Methods

The research was carried out across 3 scientific databases: PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were selectively screened for relevance, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The quality assessment of studies was performed using the RISK-OF-BIAS 2 tool for randomized trials and ROBINS-I for cohort studies.

Results

MARPE is ideal for moderate deficiencies in younger patients with partially fused sutures, non-surgical nature allows for quicker recovery and fewer complications . Whereas SARPE is preferred for severe deficiencies in adults with fully fused sutures. highly effective for complex cases, requiring surgery, longer recovery time and higher costs.

Conclusions

Ultimately, The choice between MARPE and SARPE should be individualized, based on a thorough evaluation of the patient’s clinical condition, age, and treatment goals.
上颌横向缺损的矫正技术:MARPE还是SARPE?
背景:上颌横向缺损(TMD)的特征是上颌狭窄,导致功能和美学问题。它通常包括上颌扩张以改善咬合和面部和谐。在现有的方法中,手术辅助快速腭扩张术(SARPE)和微型螺钉辅助快速腭扩张术(MARPE)是矫正TMD的两种主要技术,特别是在成人患者中。目的:本系统综述旨在比较两种技术的适应症、优点、局限性和临床结果。方法通过PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆3个科学数据库进行研究。遵循PRISMA指南,对相关研究进行选择性筛选。随机试验使用RISK-OF-BIAS 2工具,队列研究使用ROBINS-I工具进行质量评估。结果smarpe是部分融合缝合的年轻患者中度缺陷的理想选择,其非手术性质允许更快的恢复和较少的并发症。然而,对于缝合完全融合的严重缺陷的成人,SARPE是首选。对需要手术、恢复时间较长、费用较高的复杂病例非常有效。结论最终,MARPE和SARPE的选择应个体化,基于对患者临床状况、年龄和治疗目标的全面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书