75 - Diagnostic algorithm for localization and complexity assessment of impacted maxillary canines

IF 3.5 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gunel Aliyeva , Sura Seyfullayeva , Alima Musayeva
{"title":"75 - Diagnostic algorithm for localization and complexity assessment of impacted maxillary canines","authors":"Gunel Aliyeva ,&nbsp;Sura Seyfullayeva ,&nbsp;Alima Musayeva","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.07.079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate diagnosis and evaluation of treatment complexity in maxillary canine impaction are essential for effective orthodontic planning. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and causes of canine impaction and to develop a diagnostic scoring system to assess treatment difficulty based on clinical and radiological criteria. A retrospective analysis of 11,704 patient records from the “Ortho-1” clinic over 35 years identified 255 cases of impaction of tooth 13 (2.17%) and 290 cases of tooth 23 (2.47%). Bilateral impaction was found in 94 cases (0.8%). Statistical analysis was performed in 44 patients who completed orthodontic treatment for bilateral impaction. A diagnostic index was developed based on: 1.⁠ ⁠Angulation to the midline (1–3 points), 2.⁠ ⁠Vertical depth relative to three occlusal reference lines (1–3 points), 3.⁠ ⁠Mesiodistal displacement (0–2 points), 4.⁠ ⁠Presence of complicating factors such as supernumerary teeth, odontomas, cysts, or rotations (0–1 point). The total score defines treatment difficulty: • 2–3 points: mild, • 4–5: moderate, • 6–9: severe. A statistically significant correlation was found between the total score and treatment duration. Higher scores were associated with increased treatment time and risk of complications. The proposed algorithm allows for more precise localization of impacted canines, individualized prognosis, and optimized treatment planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":"14 6","pages":"Page 424"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212443825001341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis and evaluation of treatment complexity in maxillary canine impaction are essential for effective orthodontic planning. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and causes of canine impaction and to develop a diagnostic scoring system to assess treatment difficulty based on clinical and radiological criteria. A retrospective analysis of 11,704 patient records from the “Ortho-1” clinic over 35 years identified 255 cases of impaction of tooth 13 (2.17%) and 290 cases of tooth 23 (2.47%). Bilateral impaction was found in 94 cases (0.8%). Statistical analysis was performed in 44 patients who completed orthodontic treatment for bilateral impaction. A diagnostic index was developed based on: 1.⁠ ⁠Angulation to the midline (1–3 points), 2.⁠ ⁠Vertical depth relative to three occlusal reference lines (1–3 points), 3.⁠ ⁠Mesiodistal displacement (0–2 points), 4.⁠ ⁠Presence of complicating factors such as supernumerary teeth, odontomas, cysts, or rotations (0–1 point). The total score defines treatment difficulty: • 2–3 points: mild, • 4–5: moderate, • 6–9: severe. A statistically significant correlation was found between the total score and treatment duration. Higher scores were associated with increased treatment time and risk of complications. The proposed algorithm allows for more precise localization of impacted canines, individualized prognosis, and optimized treatment planning.
上颌埋伏牙定位与复杂性评估的诊断算法
准确的诊断和评估上颌牙嵌塞的治疗复杂性对于制定有效的正畸计划至关重要。本研究旨在确定犬嵌塞的患病率和原因,并根据临床和放射学标准制定诊断评分系统来评估治疗难度。回顾性分析“ortho1”门诊35年来11704例患者的记录,发现13号牙嵌塞255例(2.17%),23号牙290例(2.47%)。双侧嵌塞94例(0.8%)。对44例完成双侧嵌塞正畸治疗的患者进行统计分析。建立了一种诊断指标:1。2.与中线成角(1-3点)相对于三条咬合参考线(1-3点)的垂直深度,4.中远端位移(0-2个点);存在复杂因素,如多牙、牙瘤、囊肿或旋转(0-1分)。总分定义治疗难度:•2-3分为轻度,•4-5分为中度,•6-9分为重度。总评分与治疗时间有显著的统计学相关性。得分越高,治疗时间越长,并发症风险越高。所提出的算法允许更精确地定位影响犬,个性化预后和优化治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书