69 - Dentin hypersensitivity after interproximal enamel reduction in patients treated with clear aligners: Desensitizing effect of diode laser vs sodium fluoride

IF 3.5 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ludovica Nucci , Maria Giovanna Ferraioli , Adriana Fiori , Antonella De Simone , Fabrizia d'Apuzzo , Vincenzo Grassia
{"title":"69 - Dentin hypersensitivity after interproximal enamel reduction in patients treated with clear aligners: Desensitizing effect of diode laser vs sodium fluoride","authors":"Ludovica Nucci ,&nbsp;Maria Giovanna Ferraioli ,&nbsp;Adriana Fiori ,&nbsp;Antonella De Simone ,&nbsp;Fabrizia d'Apuzzo ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Grassia","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.07.073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) is a common procedure in orthodontic treatment with clear aligners, but it may lead to dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and changes in gingival health.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluated dentin hypersensitivity and gingival health after IPR in patients treated with clear aligners and compared the desensitizing effect of laser diode versus sodium fluoride.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was a triple-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. To be eligible for inclusion, patients had to respect for the following criteria: permanent dentition, good oral and general health. Previous history of hypersensitivity, enamel defects, cervical caries, periodontal disease, or pregnancy were excluded. A total of 45 patients with an orthodontic treatment plan including clear aligners and IPR (aged 14–63yrs) were randomly assigned to three groups: Group A (acidulated sodium fluoride gel: 0.33% NaF), Group B (diode laser: Soft Touch, 810 nm, 0,5W), and Group C (control, no treatment). In all groups, the response to air stimuli and the gingival indices were recorded before (T0) and immediately after IPR (T1), one week (T2), one month (T3), and three months post-treatment (T4). DH was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) by a blinded operator, while gingival health was evaluated using Silness and Löe Plaque and Gingivitis Indices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All groups showed an increase in DH immediately after IPR compared to baseline, which subsequently decreased at T2, T3, and T4. The laser group exhibited a statistically significant 10% reduction in DH, with rapid improvement one week post-treatment and sustained benefits over time. The gingival index improved or remained stable across all groups, with the laser group showing the most pronounced improvements. Moreover, the Plaque index was reduced in all groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The application of diode laser, after IPR, effectively reduced DH without adversely affecting gingival health. This finding supports the use of laser therapy to manage DH in orthodontic patients undergoing IPR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":"14 6","pages":"Page 422"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212443825001286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) is a common procedure in orthodontic treatment with clear aligners, but it may lead to dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and changes in gingival health.

Objective

This study evaluated dentin hypersensitivity and gingival health after IPR in patients treated with clear aligners and compared the desensitizing effect of laser diode versus sodium fluoride.

Methods

The study was a triple-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. To be eligible for inclusion, patients had to respect for the following criteria: permanent dentition, good oral and general health. Previous history of hypersensitivity, enamel defects, cervical caries, periodontal disease, or pregnancy were excluded. A total of 45 patients with an orthodontic treatment plan including clear aligners and IPR (aged 14–63yrs) were randomly assigned to three groups: Group A (acidulated sodium fluoride gel: 0.33% NaF), Group B (diode laser: Soft Touch, 810 nm, 0,5W), and Group C (control, no treatment). In all groups, the response to air stimuli and the gingival indices were recorded before (T0) and immediately after IPR (T1), one week (T2), one month (T3), and three months post-treatment (T4). DH was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) by a blinded operator, while gingival health was evaluated using Silness and Löe Plaque and Gingivitis Indices.

Results

All groups showed an increase in DH immediately after IPR compared to baseline, which subsequently decreased at T2, T3, and T4. The laser group exhibited a statistically significant 10% reduction in DH, with rapid improvement one week post-treatment and sustained benefits over time. The gingival index improved or remained stable across all groups, with the laser group showing the most pronounced improvements. Moreover, the Plaque index was reduced in all groups.

Conclusion

The application of diode laser, after IPR, effectively reduced DH without adversely affecting gingival health. This finding supports the use of laser therapy to manage DH in orthodontic patients undergoing IPR.
用透明矫正器治疗近端间牙釉质复位后的牙本质过敏:二极管激光与氟化钠的脱敏效果
近端间牙釉质还原(IPR)是正畸治疗中常用的一种方法,但它可能导致牙本质过敏(DH)和牙龈健康的变化。目的评价牙本质过敏和牙龈健康状况,并比较激光二极管和氟化钠的脱敏效果。方法采用三盲随机对照临床试验。为了有资格纳入,患者必须遵守以下标准:恒牙、口腔健康和一般健康。既往过敏史、牙釉质缺损史、宫颈龋病史、牙周病史或妊娠史均排除在外。采用含透明矫正器和IPR的正畸治疗方案的患者45例(年龄14 - 63岁),随机分为3组:A组(酸化氟化钠凝胶:0.33% NaF)、B组(二极管激光:软触,810 nm, 0.5 w)和C组(对照组,未治疗)。各组患者分别于治疗前(T0)、治疗后立即(T1)、治疗后1周(T2)、1个月(T3)、治疗后3个月(T4)记录空气刺激反应及牙龈指数。由盲法操作人员使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估DH,而使用Silness和Löe菌斑和牙龈炎指数评估牙龈健康状况。结果与基线相比,所有组在IPR后立即出现DH升高,随后在T2, T3和T4时下降。激光治疗组的DH降低了10%,在治疗后一周迅速改善,并随着时间的推移持续获益。所有组的牙龈指数都有所改善或保持稳定,其中激光组的改善最为明显。此外,各组斑块指数均有所降低。结论二极管激光在IPR后的应用可有效降低DH,且不影响牙龈健康。这一发现支持使用激光治疗来管理正畸患者的DH接受IPR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书