Prognostic assessment of sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome in older patients using clinical and CT-based radiomic features

IF 4.3
Experimental gerontology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.exger.2025.112987
Xiya Wang , Bowen Zhang , Ying Chen , Xinzhen Gao , Yongshen Bai , Shuxing Wei , Shubin Guo , Xue Mei
{"title":"Prognostic assessment of sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome in older patients using clinical and CT-based radiomic features","authors":"Xiya Wang ,&nbsp;Bowen Zhang ,&nbsp;Ying Chen ,&nbsp;Xinzhen Gao ,&nbsp;Yongshen Bai ,&nbsp;Shuxing Wei ,&nbsp;Shubin Guo ,&nbsp;Xue Mei","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2025.112987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (SI-ARDS) is associated with high mortality rates, necessitating early risk stratification. This study aimed to develop and validate a radiomics-based nomogram integrating computed tomography (CT) features and clinical parameters to predict 28-day mortality in older patients with SI-ARDS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective cohort study, 302 older patients (≥60 years) diagnosed with SI-ARDS between January 2019 and December 2023 were enrolled. Radiomic features were extracted from admission chest CT images. Patients were randomly allocated to training (n = 242) and validation (n = 60) cohorts. Three predictive models—radiomic, clinical, and combined—were constructed using Maximum Relevance Minimum Redundancy (MRMR) algorithm and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. A nomogram was developed based on the optimal model for clinical application.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The fusion model achieved superior discrimination compared with the radiomic model, clinical model, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in both cohorts (C-index: training, 0.850 vs. 0.798, 0.781, and 0.654; validation, 0.839 vs. 0.768, 0.779, and 0.696; all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The model demonstrated excellent calibration and provided greater net clinical benefit across threshold probabilities of 10 %–90 %. Risk stratification using the nomogram identified distinct prognostic groups with significantly different 28-day survival (log-rank <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The nomogram developed from the fusion model demonstrated superior predictive performance for 28-day mortality in older patients with SI-ARDS compared to conventional scoring systems, though multicenter validation is required to confirm clinical utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 112987"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S053155652500316X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (SI-ARDS) is associated with high mortality rates, necessitating early risk stratification. This study aimed to develop and validate a radiomics-based nomogram integrating computed tomography (CT) features and clinical parameters to predict 28-day mortality in older patients with SI-ARDS.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, 302 older patients (≥60 years) diagnosed with SI-ARDS between January 2019 and December 2023 were enrolled. Radiomic features were extracted from admission chest CT images. Patients were randomly allocated to training (n = 242) and validation (n = 60) cohorts. Three predictive models—radiomic, clinical, and combined—were constructed using Maximum Relevance Minimum Redundancy (MRMR) algorithm and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. A nomogram was developed based on the optimal model for clinical application.

Results

The fusion model achieved superior discrimination compared with the radiomic model, clinical model, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in both cohorts (C-index: training, 0.850 vs. 0.798, 0.781, and 0.654; validation, 0.839 vs. 0.768, 0.779, and 0.696; all p < 0.001). The model demonstrated excellent calibration and provided greater net clinical benefit across threshold probabilities of 10 %–90 %. Risk stratification using the nomogram identified distinct prognostic groups with significantly different 28-day survival (log-rank p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The nomogram developed from the fusion model demonstrated superior predictive performance for 28-day mortality in older patients with SI-ARDS compared to conventional scoring systems, though multicenter validation is required to confirm clinical utility.
使用临床和基于ct的放射学特征评估败血症引起的老年患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征的预后。
背景:败血症引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(SI-ARDS)死亡率高,需要进行早期风险分层。本研究旨在开发和验证一种基于放射组学的图,结合计算机断层扫描(CT)特征和临床参数来预测老年SI-ARDS患者的28天死亡率。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,纳入了2019年1月至2023年12月期间诊断为SI-ARDS的302例老年患者(≥60 岁)。从入院胸部CT图像中提取放射学特征。患者被随机分配到训练组(n = 242)和验证组(n = 60)。使用最大相关最小冗余(MRMR)算法和最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归构建了放射学、临床和组合三种预测模型。采用一致性指数(C-index)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析来评估模型的性能。在此基础上建立了一种适合临床应用的模式图。结果:在两个队列中,与放射学模型、临床模型和序贯器官衰竭评估评分相比,融合模型取得了更好的识别效果(c指数:训练,0.850比0.798、0.781和0.654;验证,0.839比0.768、0.779和0.696;结论:与传统评分系统相比,融合模型开发的nomogram对SI-ARDS老年患者28天死亡率的预测能力更强,但需要多中心验证来证实其临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental gerontology
Experimental gerontology Ageing, Biochemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书