Defining the scope of clinical practice guidelines for managing psychosocial difficulties following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Impairment Pub Date : 2026-03-26 DOI:10.1071/IB25082
Holly Emery, Dana Wong, Grahame Simpson, Paul Gertler, Sarah Carrier, Skye McDonald, Tamara Ownsworth, Jacinta Douglas, Travis Wearne, Angela T Morgan, Robyn Tate, Olivia J Zuber, Sarah Skromanis, Janet Doubleday, Cynthia A Honan
{"title":"Defining the scope of clinical practice guidelines for managing psychosocial difficulties following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Holly Emery, Dana Wong, Grahame Simpson, Paul Gertler, Sarah Carrier, Skye McDonald, Tamara Ownsworth, Jacinta Douglas, Travis Wearne, Angela T Morgan, Robyn Tate, Olivia J Zuber, Sarah Skromanis, Janet Doubleday, Cynthia A Honan","doi":"10.1071/IB25082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychosocial difficulties or reduced functioning in social-cognitive, emotional/mental health, or behavioural domains are common following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. However, there is currently no Australian-based guideline for management of these difficulties. To inform development of such a guideline, we aimed to integrate evidence available with stakeholder input to establish the guideline scope.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overarching governance for the project was provided through an established Guideline Development Group who oversaw the four key steps of the scoping process: (1) initial areas of relevance were generated; (2a) scoping reviews were conducted to establish the availability of evidence; (2b) priority surveys with health professionals (n = 86) and individuals with lived experience of traumatic brain injury or close others (n = 55) were completed; (3) a panel comprising 26 experts convened at a 1-day workshop to conceptualise the initial guideline scope; and (4) the scope was then iteratively refined, leading to a scoping document specifying the key clinical questions, difficulties/disorders and treatment outcomes the guideline would address.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scoping reviews identified intervention studies across mental health (n = 74), behaviour (n = 55) and social cognition (n = 19). Survey results prioritised most psychosocial difficulties and identified key treatment outcomes. The final guideline scope included one key clinical question relating to treatment effectiveness, four sub-questions related to treatment decisions for specific groups and circumstances, and two areas of additional commentary to supplement recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The methodology used to establish the guideline scope will facilitate the development of a clinical practice guideline for the management of psychosocial difficulties in adults with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB25082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychosocial difficulties or reduced functioning in social-cognitive, emotional/mental health, or behavioural domains are common following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. However, there is currently no Australian-based guideline for management of these difficulties. To inform development of such a guideline, we aimed to integrate evidence available with stakeholder input to establish the guideline scope.

Methods: Overarching governance for the project was provided through an established Guideline Development Group who oversaw the four key steps of the scoping process: (1) initial areas of relevance were generated; (2a) scoping reviews were conducted to establish the availability of evidence; (2b) priority surveys with health professionals (n = 86) and individuals with lived experience of traumatic brain injury or close others (n = 55) were completed; (3) a panel comprising 26 experts convened at a 1-day workshop to conceptualise the initial guideline scope; and (4) the scope was then iteratively refined, leading to a scoping document specifying the key clinical questions, difficulties/disorders and treatment outcomes the guideline would address.

Results: The scoping reviews identified intervention studies across mental health (n = 74), behaviour (n = 55) and social cognition (n = 19). Survey results prioritised most psychosocial difficulties and identified key treatment outcomes. The final guideline scope included one key clinical question relating to treatment effectiveness, four sub-questions related to treatment decisions for specific groups and circumstances, and two areas of additional commentary to supplement recommendations.

Conclusions: The methodology used to establish the guideline scope will facilitate the development of a clinical practice guideline for the management of psychosocial difficulties in adults with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.

界定中度至重度创伤性脑损伤后心理社会困难管理临床实践指南的范围。
背景:社会心理困难或社会认知、情绪/心理健康或行为领域功能下降是中重度脑外伤后常见的症状。然而,目前还没有以澳大利亚为基础的指导方针来管理这些困难。为了给这样一个指南的发展提供信息,我们的目标是整合现有的证据和利益相关者的意见,以建立指南的范围。方法:项目的总体治理是通过一个已成立的指导方针开发小组提供的,该小组监督范围界定过程的四个关键步骤:(1)产生初始相关领域;(2a)进行了范围审查,以确定证据的可得性;(2b)对卫生专业人员(n = 86)和有过创伤性脑损伤生活经历的个人或亲密他人(n = 54)进行优先调查;(3)一个由26名专家组成的小组,在为期一天的研讨会上对初步指南范围进行概念化;(4)然后迭代地细化范围,从而形成一份范围界定文件,指定指南将解决的关键临床问题、困难/障碍和治疗结果。结果:范围审查确定了涉及心理健康(n = 74)、行为(n = 55)和社会认知(n = 19)的干预研究。调查结果确定了大多数社会心理困难的优先次序,并确定了关键的治疗结果。最终的指南范围包括一个与治疗有效性相关的关键临床问题,四个与特定群体和情况的治疗决策相关的子问题,以及两个补充建议的附加评论领域。结论:用于建立指南范围的方法将有助于制定中重度创伤性脑损伤成人心理社会困难管理的临床实践指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Impairment
Brain Impairment CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal addresses topics related to the aetiology, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of brain impairment with a particular focus on the implications for functional status, participation, rehabilitation and quality of life. Disciplines reflect a broad multidisciplinary scope and include neuroscience, neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech pathology, social work, and nursing. Submissions are welcome across the full range of conditions that affect brain function (stroke, tumour, progressive neurological illnesses, dementia, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc.) throughout the lifespan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书