Abigail Greek, Shubh K Patel, Syed M Ali Hassan, Yazan Saleh, Caroline Goveas, Bobby Yanagawa
{"title":"Sex differences in postoperative outcomes for infective endocarditis.","authors":"Abigail Greek, Shubh K Patel, Syed M Ali Hassan, Yazan Saleh, Caroline Goveas, Bobby Yanagawa","doi":"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a prevalent and high-risk condition despite advances in cardiac care. Increasing attention has been directed toward sex-based differences in physiological presentation, disease progression, and surgical management. This review synthesizes evidence on sex-specific differences in IE, with an emphasis on diagnosis, risk factors, disease manifestations, medical management, surgical intervention, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While the incidence of IE is more than twice as high in men, women consistently experience worse outcomes. Women present at an older age, with greater comorbidity burden and greater delays in surgical referral. Postoperatively, women are at higher risk of complications - including embolic events, extended ventilation time, and intensive care unit stays - and have significantly higher short-term mortality. Long-term survival is comparable between sexes, suggesting disparities largely influence short-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Awareness of sex-specific differences in risk factors, clinical presentation, intervention bias, complications, and outcomes of IE is essential for optimizing management and equitable care. Further research into sex-based pathophysiology, comorbidity management, and tailored perioperative strategies is critical to advancing patient-centered treatment and optimizing clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55197,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"67-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a prevalent and high-risk condition despite advances in cardiac care. Increasing attention has been directed toward sex-based differences in physiological presentation, disease progression, and surgical management. This review synthesizes evidence on sex-specific differences in IE, with an emphasis on diagnosis, risk factors, disease manifestations, medical management, surgical intervention, and postoperative outcomes.
Recent findings: While the incidence of IE is more than twice as high in men, women consistently experience worse outcomes. Women present at an older age, with greater comorbidity burden and greater delays in surgical referral. Postoperatively, women are at higher risk of complications - including embolic events, extended ventilation time, and intensive care unit stays - and have significantly higher short-term mortality. Long-term survival is comparable between sexes, suggesting disparities largely influence short-term outcomes.
Summary: Awareness of sex-specific differences in risk factors, clinical presentation, intervention bias, complications, and outcomes of IE is essential for optimizing management and equitable care. Further research into sex-based pathophysiology, comorbidity management, and tailored perioperative strategies is critical to advancing patient-centered treatment and optimizing clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Cardiology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fourteen disciplines published across the year – including arrhythmias, molecular genetics, HDL cholesterol and clinical trials – every issue also contains annotated reference detailing the merits of the most important papers.