Contributions of Community Advisory Board and Experience of Study Participants in TB/MDR-TB Clinical Trial Management in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study

IF 1.3 3区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Developing World Bioethics Pub Date : 2026-09-12 Epub Date: 2025-12-07 DOI:10.1111/dewb.70014
Yemisrach Seralegne, Abaraham G/Medihin, Ermiyas Hundito, Hawult Adane, Bizunesh Sintayehu
{"title":"Contributions of Community Advisory Board and Experience of Study Participants in TB/MDR-TB Clinical Trial Management in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Yemisrach Seralegne,&nbsp;Abaraham G/Medihin,&nbsp;Ermiyas Hundito,&nbsp;Hawult Adane,&nbsp;Bizunesh Sintayehu","doi":"10.1111/dewb.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Community Advisory Boards (CABs), as a form of community engagement, provide an important mechanism to ensure that research aligns with community needs and priorities by representing broader community interests and guiding research accordingly. Tuberculosis (TB) and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) remain significant public health concerns, particularly due to resistance to key first-line anti-TB medications, and individuals affected by these conditions often face stigma and discrimination that hinder timely diagnosis and treatment adherence. Addressing these challenges requires community-driven strategies and improved access to health services, with CABs serving a central role in bridging gaps between researchers, healthcare providers, and affected communities. This study explored the contributions of CAB members in supporting TB/MDR-TB clinical trials, the challenges experienced by trial participants, and the strategies employed to address these challenges. Using an exploratory qualitative design, in-depth interviews were conducted with 17 stakeholders involved in TB/MDR-TB clinical trials, and data were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis. The findings highlight persistent stigma and discrimination, limited understanding of the role and functions of CABs, inconsistent budget allocation, reduced participation, and diminished CAB influence throughout the research process. The study underscores the essential role of CABs in enhancing community engagement in TB/MDR-TB clinical trials and emphasizes the need for greater awareness, advocacy, and institutional support to strengthen their contributions. Adequate and sustained funding, along with systematic planning and implementation, is critical for reinforcing CAB roles and promoting more ethical, inclusive, and responsive public health research practices in Ethiopia and other low- and middle-income countries.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":"26 3","pages":"164-171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developing World Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dewb.70014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community Advisory Boards (CABs), as a form of community engagement, provide an important mechanism to ensure that research aligns with community needs and priorities by representing broader community interests and guiding research accordingly. Tuberculosis (TB) and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) remain significant public health concerns, particularly due to resistance to key first-line anti-TB medications, and individuals affected by these conditions often face stigma and discrimination that hinder timely diagnosis and treatment adherence. Addressing these challenges requires community-driven strategies and improved access to health services, with CABs serving a central role in bridging gaps between researchers, healthcare providers, and affected communities. This study explored the contributions of CAB members in supporting TB/MDR-TB clinical trials, the challenges experienced by trial participants, and the strategies employed to address these challenges. Using an exploratory qualitative design, in-depth interviews were conducted with 17 stakeholders involved in TB/MDR-TB clinical trials, and data were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis. The findings highlight persistent stigma and discrimination, limited understanding of the role and functions of CABs, inconsistent budget allocation, reduced participation, and diminished CAB influence throughout the research process. The study underscores the essential role of CABs in enhancing community engagement in TB/MDR-TB clinical trials and emphasizes the need for greater awareness, advocacy, and institutional support to strengthen their contributions. Adequate and sustained funding, along with systematic planning and implementation, is critical for reinforcing CAB roles and promoting more ethical, inclusive, and responsive public health research practices in Ethiopia and other low- and middle-income countries.

社区咨询委员会的贡献和研究参与者在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴结核病/耐多药结核病临床试验管理中的经验:一项定性研究。
社区咨询委员会作为社区参与的一种形式,通过代表更广泛的社区利益并相应地指导研究,为确保研究符合社区需求和优先事项提供了一个重要的机制。结核病(TB)和耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)仍然是重大的公共卫生问题,特别是由于对主要一线抗结核药物的耐药性,受这些疾病影响的个人往往面临耻辱和歧视,阻碍了及时诊断和坚持治疗。应对这些挑战需要社区驱动的战略和改善获得卫生服务的机会,cab在弥合研究人员、卫生保健提供者和受影响社区之间的差距方面发挥核心作用。本研究探讨了CAB成员在支持结核病/耐多药结核病临床试验方面的贡献,试验参与者所面临的挑战,以及应对这些挑战所采用的策略。采用探索性定性设计,对参与结核病/耐多药结核病临床试验的17名利益相关者进行了深入访谈,并使用演绎主题分析对数据进行了分析。研究结果强调了持续的耻辱和歧视,对CAB的作用和功能的理解有限,预算分配不一致,参与减少,以及在整个研究过程中CAB的影响力减弱。该研究强调了cab在加强社区参与结核病/耐多药结核病临床试验方面的重要作用,并强调需要提高认识、宣传和机构支持,以加强其贡献。充足和持续的供资以及系统的规划和执行,对于在埃塞俄比亚和其他低收入和中等收入国家加强CAB的作用和促进更具道德、包容性和响应性的公共卫生研究实践至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Developing World Bioethics
Developing World Bioethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Developing World Bioethics provides long needed case studies, teaching materials, news in brief, and legal backgrounds to bioethics scholars and students in developing and developed countries alike. This companion journal to Bioethics also features high-quality peer reviewed original articles. It is edited by well-known bioethicists who are working in developing countries, yet it will also be open to contributions and commentary from developed countries'' authors. Developing World Bioethics is the only journal in the field dedicated exclusively to developing countries'' bioethics issues. The journal is an essential resource for all those concerned about bioethical issues in the developing world. Members of Ethics Committees in developing countries will highly value a special section dedicated to their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书