Recognition and Perception of Registered Lebanese Midwives Regarding Ethical Dilemmas.

IF 2.1 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-08 DOI:10.1007/s11673-025-10486-9
Yasmine Choucair, Ali Kanso, Grace Ziade, Lubna Tarabey, Fadi Abou-Mrad
{"title":"Recognition and Perception of Registered Lebanese Midwives Regarding Ethical Dilemmas.","authors":"Yasmine Choucair, Ali Kanso, Grace Ziade, Lubna Tarabey, Fadi Abou-Mrad","doi":"10.1007/s11673-025-10486-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Midwives are frequently confronted with ethical dilemmas and require guidance in addressing them. This study investigates Lebanese midwives' recognition of and perception of ethical dilemmas in clinical practice, examines influencing factors and explores the role of internal policies and ethics committees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lebanese midwives who graduated between 2017 and 2021 and were registered in the Lebanese Order of Midwives participated in this qualitative and quantitative survey. In September 2022, three online focus groups were held via Zoom with sixteen participants answering validated questions. A quantitative survey was carried out Between October and December 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 147 midwives completed the questionnaire. The most frequently reported ethical dilemmas involved disagreements within the team and with patients or families, followed by challenges related to patient autonomy. Among the ethical dilemmas studied, disagreement with patient or family, patient autonomy, and restrictive and hierarchical institutional regulations were found to be significantly associated with the support person sought by the midwives (p = 0.015, p = 0.037, and p = 0.045, respectively). The presence of an ethics committee was significantly associated with reliance on \"moral perception and judgement\" as a means of coping with ethical challenges (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lebanese midwives regularly face ethical dilemmas, notably disagreements and patient autonomy issues. The presence of an ethics committee significantly aids their moral judgement, highlighting the need for institutional structures that guide ethical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":"537-552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10486-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Midwives are frequently confronted with ethical dilemmas and require guidance in addressing them. This study investigates Lebanese midwives' recognition of and perception of ethical dilemmas in clinical practice, examines influencing factors and explores the role of internal policies and ethics committees.

Methods: Lebanese midwives who graduated between 2017 and 2021 and were registered in the Lebanese Order of Midwives participated in this qualitative and quantitative survey. In September 2022, three online focus groups were held via Zoom with sixteen participants answering validated questions. A quantitative survey was carried out Between October and December 2022.

Results: A total of 147 midwives completed the questionnaire. The most frequently reported ethical dilemmas involved disagreements within the team and with patients or families, followed by challenges related to patient autonomy. Among the ethical dilemmas studied, disagreement with patient or family, patient autonomy, and restrictive and hierarchical institutional regulations were found to be significantly associated with the support person sought by the midwives (p = 0.015, p = 0.037, and p = 0.045, respectively). The presence of an ethics committee was significantly associated with reliance on "moral perception and judgement" as a means of coping with ethical challenges (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Lebanese midwives regularly face ethical dilemmas, notably disagreements and patient autonomy issues. The presence of an ethics committee significantly aids their moral judgement, highlighting the need for institutional structures that guide ethical practice.

对黎巴嫩注册助产士关于道德困境的认识和看法。
助产士经常面临道德困境,需要指导来解决这些问题。本研究调查了黎巴嫩助产士在临床实践中对伦理困境的认识和感知,考察了影响因素,并探讨了内部政策和伦理委员会的作用。方法:2017年至2021年毕业并在黎巴嫩助产士协会注册的黎巴嫩助产士参加了这项定性和定量调查。2022年9月,通过Zoom举行了三个在线焦点小组,16名参与者回答了经过验证的问题。一项定量调查于2022年10月至12月进行。结果:共有147名助产士完成问卷调查。最常见的伦理困境涉及团队内部、患者或家属之间的分歧,其次是与患者自主权相关的挑战。在研究的伦理困境中,与患者或家属的分歧、患者自主、限制性和等级制度法规与助产士寻求支持人员显著相关(p = 0.015、p = 0.037和p = 0.045)。伦理委员会的存在与依赖“道德感知和判断”作为应对伦理挑战的手段显著相关(p结论:黎巴嫩助产士经常面临伦理困境,特别是分歧和患者自主问题。伦理委员会的存在极大地帮助了他们的道德判断,强调了指导伦理实践的制度结构的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JBI welcomes both reports of empirical research and articles that increase theoretical understanding of medicine and health care, the health professions and the biological sciences. The JBI is also open to critical reflections on medicine and conventional bioethics, the nature of health, illness and disability, the sources of ethics, the nature of ethical communities, and possible implications of new developments in science and technology for social and cultural life and human identity. We welcome contributions from perspectives that are less commonly published in existing journals in the field and reports of empirical research studies using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The JBI accepts contributions from authors working in or across disciplines including – but not limited to – the following: -philosophy- bioethics- economics- social theory- law- public health and epidemiology- anthropology- psychology- feminism- gay and lesbian studies- linguistics and discourse analysis- cultural studies- disability studies- history- literature and literary studies- environmental sciences- theology and religious studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书