Efficacy of Carotid Artery Stenting Without Embolic Protection Device for Carotid Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Major Neurointerventional Center.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Seyedbahaadin Siroos, Morteza Taheri, Aryoobarzan Rahmatian, Kavous Firouznia, Mojtaba Khazaei, Hossein Ghanaati
{"title":"Efficacy of Carotid Artery Stenting Without Embolic Protection Device for Carotid Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Major Neurointerventional Center.","authors":"Seyedbahaadin Siroos, Morteza Taheri, Aryoobarzan Rahmatian, Kavous Firouznia, Mojtaba Khazaei, Hossein Ghanaati","doi":"10.1097/NRL.0000000000000642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) as a method for reducing the risk of stroke in patients with carotid stenosis (CS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed all patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis who underwent CAS at a single neurointerventional center from January 2016 to September 2022. Patients with concurrent intracranial stenosis, previous CEA, interfering neurological disorders, or incomplete data were excluded. Preoperative evaluations included comprehensive clinical assessments, and CAS procedures were conducted without embolic protection devices (EPDs). Postoperative monitoring involved intensive care unit (ICU) observation and MRI in selected cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 91 patients (mean age 69.2±10.2 y, 65.9% male). The right ICA was involved in 46 patients and the left in 45 patients. The degree of stenosis significantly decreased from 80.58±12.53% to 16.61±9.54% post-CAS. Early neurological complications were observed in 5.4% of patients. Transient bradycardia during the procedure was common but resolved with atropine. One patient experienced prolonged bradycardia, but it resolved without lasting effects. Two patients had transient contralateral paresis postprocedure; one showed diffusion restriction on MRI but both recovered fully. Severe complications included one death due to intracranial hemorrhage and one case of hemiplegia with partial recovery over 3 months. Follow-up ultrasound in 30 patients showed no instances of restenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAS significantly reduces CS and potentially aids in stroke prevention. The findings suggest that CAS without EPDs may achieve similar early outcomes, particularly in regions with limited EPD access.</p>","PeriodicalId":49758,"journal":{"name":"Neurologist","volume":" ","pages":"14-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NRL.0000000000000642","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) as a method for reducing the risk of stroke in patients with carotid stenosis (CS).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed all patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis who underwent CAS at a single neurointerventional center from January 2016 to September 2022. Patients with concurrent intracranial stenosis, previous CEA, interfering neurological disorders, or incomplete data were excluded. Preoperative evaluations included comprehensive clinical assessments, and CAS procedures were conducted without embolic protection devices (EPDs). Postoperative monitoring involved intensive care unit (ICU) observation and MRI in selected cases.

Results: The study included 91 patients (mean age 69.2±10.2 y, 65.9% male). The right ICA was involved in 46 patients and the left in 45 patients. The degree of stenosis significantly decreased from 80.58±12.53% to 16.61±9.54% post-CAS. Early neurological complications were observed in 5.4% of patients. Transient bradycardia during the procedure was common but resolved with atropine. One patient experienced prolonged bradycardia, but it resolved without lasting effects. Two patients had transient contralateral paresis postprocedure; one showed diffusion restriction on MRI but both recovered fully. Severe complications included one death due to intracranial hemorrhage and one case of hemiplegia with partial recovery over 3 months. Follow-up ultrasound in 30 patients showed no instances of restenosis.

Conclusions: CAS significantly reduces CS and potentially aids in stroke prevention. The findings suggest that CAS without EPDs may achieve similar early outcomes, particularly in regions with limited EPD access.

无栓塞保护装置的颈动脉支架置入治疗颈动脉狭窄的疗效:一项来自主要神经介入中心的回顾性队列研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)作为降低颈动脉狭窄(CS)患者卒中风险的方法的有效性和安全性。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2016年1月至2022年9月在单一神经介入中心接受CAS治疗的所有颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄患者。排除并发颅内狭窄、既往CEA、干扰性神经系统疾病或数据不完整的患者。术前评估包括全面的临床评估,在不使用栓塞保护装置(EPDs)的情况下进行CAS程序。术后监测包括重症监护病房(ICU)观察和MRI。结果:91例患者入组,平均年龄69.2±10.2岁,男性占65.9%。46例患者右侧ICA受累,45例患者左侧ICA受累。术后狭窄程度由80.58±12.53%降至16.61±9.54%。5.4%的患者出现早期神经系统并发症。在手术过程中短暂性心动过缓是常见的,但阿托品解决。一名患者经历了长时间的心动过缓,但没有持久的影响。2例患者术后出现一过性对侧轻瘫;1例MRI显示扩散受限,但均完全康复。严重并发症包括1例颅内出血死亡和1例偏瘫,部分恢复超过3个月。30例随访超声未见再狭窄。结论:CAS可显著降低CS,并可能有助于卒中预防。研究结果表明,没有EPD的CAS可能会取得类似的早期结果,特别是在EPD获取有限的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologist
Neurologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Neurologist publishes articles on topics of current interest to physicians treating patients with neurological diseases. The core of the journal is review articles focusing on clinically relevant issues. The journal also publishes case reports or case series which review the literature and put observations in perspective, as well as letters to the editor. Special features include the popular "10 Most Commonly Asked Questions" and the "Patient and Family Fact Sheet," a handy tear-out page that can be copied to hand out to patients and their caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书