Effectiveness of Adrenal Venous Sampling in the Management of Primary Aldosteronism: Single-Centered Cross-Sectional Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Sri Lanka.

IF 1.5 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Chathurangani Balasooriya, Supun Manathunga, Sujeeva Nagaratnam, Siddiqa Ozaal, Janeesha Liyanagunawardana, Gaya Katulanda
{"title":"Effectiveness of Adrenal Venous Sampling in the Management of Primary Aldosteronism: Single-Centered Cross-Sectional Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Sri Lanka.","authors":"Chathurangani Balasooriya, Supun Manathunga, Sujeeva Nagaratnam, Siddiqa Ozaal, Janeesha Liyanagunawardana, Gaya Katulanda","doi":"10.15605/jafes.040.02.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the gold standard procedure to discriminate unilateral primary aldosteronism (UPA) from bilateral disease (BPA). AVS is technically demanding and is only performed in a limited number of centers in Sri Lanka. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of AVS in the management of primary aldosteronism.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Thirty-two patients who underwent AVS at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka from April 2021 to April 2023 were enrolled. Continuous and categorical variables were summarized with mean ± SD and proportions, respectively. Mean and standard deviation of contralateral suppression index (CSI) were estimated with an intercept-only Bayesian inference model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adrenal veins were successfully cannulated in 12 (37.5%). Lateralization was established in 11 (91.7%), and one was diagnosed as having bilateral disease. There were no total failures. Right AV cannulation was unsuccessful in 18 (56.25%), out of which lateralization was demonstrated in 9 (50%), while the rest were considered inconclusive. Left AV cannulation was unsuccessful only in 2 (6.25%); one was lateralized, while the other remained inconclusive. Among patients classified as having unilateral disease, the estimated mean of the CSI was 0.33 (89% credible interval: 0.11-0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite failure due to procedural difficulties, AVS remained useful in the management of patients with PA. CSI remains a useful tool when cannulation is unsuccessful, especially on the right side.</p>","PeriodicalId":41792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies","volume":"40 2","pages":"126-131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12680867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15605/jafes.040.02.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the gold standard procedure to discriminate unilateral primary aldosteronism (UPA) from bilateral disease (BPA). AVS is technically demanding and is only performed in a limited number of centers in Sri Lanka. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of AVS in the management of primary aldosteronism.

Methodology: Thirty-two patients who underwent AVS at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka from April 2021 to April 2023 were enrolled. Continuous and categorical variables were summarized with mean ± SD and proportions, respectively. Mean and standard deviation of contralateral suppression index (CSI) were estimated with an intercept-only Bayesian inference model.

Results: The adrenal veins were successfully cannulated in 12 (37.5%). Lateralization was established in 11 (91.7%), and one was diagnosed as having bilateral disease. There were no total failures. Right AV cannulation was unsuccessful in 18 (56.25%), out of which lateralization was demonstrated in 9 (50%), while the rest were considered inconclusive. Left AV cannulation was unsuccessful only in 2 (6.25%); one was lateralized, while the other remained inconclusive. Among patients classified as having unilateral disease, the estimated mean of the CSI was 0.33 (89% credible interval: 0.11-0.86).

Conclusion: Despite failure due to procedural difficulties, AVS remained useful in the management of patients with PA. CSI remains a useful tool when cannulation is unsuccessful, especially on the right side.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肾上腺静脉取样在原发性醛固酮增多症治疗中的有效性:斯里兰卡一家三级医院的单中心横断面研究。
简介:肾上腺静脉取样(AVS)是区分单侧原发性醛固酮增多症(UPA)和双侧疾病(BPA)的金标准程序。AVS在技术上要求很高,仅在斯里兰卡的有限几个中心进行。本研究旨在评价AVS治疗原发性醛固酮增多症的有效性。方法:纳入了2021年4月至2023年4月在斯里兰卡国立医院接受AVS的32例患者。连续变量和分类变量分别用均值±SD和比例进行汇总。用仅截距贝叶斯推理模型估计对侧抑制指数(CSI)的均值和标准差。结果:肾上腺静脉插管成功12例(37.5%)。11例(91.7%)出现偏侧,1例诊断为双侧病变。没有完全失败。18例(56.25%)右房室插管不成功,其中9例(50%)显示偏侧,其余未确定。左侧房室插管失败2例(6.25%);一个是侧化的,而另一个仍然没有定论。在被分类为单侧疾病的患者中,CSI的估计平均值为0.33(89%可信区间:0.11-0.86)。结论:尽管由于操作困难而失败,AVS在治疗PA患者中仍然有用。当插管不成功时,CSI仍然是一个有用的工具,特别是在右侧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies (JAFES) is an OPEN ACCESS, internationally peer-reviewed, English language, medical and health science journal that is published in print two times a year by the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies. It shall serve as the endocrine window between the ASEAN region and the world, featuring original papers and publishing key findings from specialists and experts of endocrinology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书