Endoscopic assessment of rectal cancer response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A narrative literature review.

IF 3.6 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Fotios Seretis, Antonia Panagaki, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Georgios Tziatzios, Konstantina Paraskeva
{"title":"Endoscopic assessment of rectal cancer response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A narrative literature review.","authors":"Fotios Seretis, Antonia Panagaki, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Georgios Tziatzios, Konstantina Paraskeva","doi":"10.5306/wjco.v16.i11.106498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rectal cancer management is currently evolving with the advent of different neoadjuvant treatment strategies and organ preservation strategies. A significant proportion of patients could achieve complete clinical response after neoadjuvant treatment, which often translates to pathologic complete response (pCR) as assessed on surgical specimens after curative intent surgery. Endoscopy plays a significant role in assessing treatment response to neoadjuvant therapies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the role of endoscopy in predicting subsequent pCR after neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive literature review was undertaken to identify the criteria used for assessment of endoscopic response and their ability to predict pCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were identified through literature review. The most commonly used endoscopic criteria for evaluation included the presence of a flat white scar and the absence of nodularity or telangiectasia. Information on the timing of endoscopic assessment in relation to neoadjuvant treatment protocols were also extracted from the studies. In most studies, the diagnostic accuracy for predicting pCR exceeded 0.8. The main limitations identified were the retrospective design of included studies included and a moderate risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopy can be a key prognostic factor in predicting pCR to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer despite significant limitations in currently available data.</p>","PeriodicalId":23802,"journal":{"name":"World journal of clinical oncology","volume":"16 11","pages":"106498"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12678963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i11.106498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rectal cancer management is currently evolving with the advent of different neoadjuvant treatment strategies and organ preservation strategies. A significant proportion of patients could achieve complete clinical response after neoadjuvant treatment, which often translates to pathologic complete response (pCR) as assessed on surgical specimens after curative intent surgery. Endoscopy plays a significant role in assessing treatment response to neoadjuvant therapies.

Aim: To explore the role of endoscopy in predicting subsequent pCR after neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer patients.

Methods: An extensive literature review was undertaken to identify the criteria used for assessment of endoscopic response and their ability to predict pCR.

Results: Fifteen studies were identified through literature review. The most commonly used endoscopic criteria for evaluation included the presence of a flat white scar and the absence of nodularity or telangiectasia. Information on the timing of endoscopic assessment in relation to neoadjuvant treatment protocols were also extracted from the studies. In most studies, the diagnostic accuracy for predicting pCR exceeded 0.8. The main limitations identified were the retrospective design of included studies included and a moderate risk of bias.

Conclusion: Endoscopy can be a key prognostic factor in predicting pCR to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer despite significant limitations in currently available data.

Abstract Image

内镜下评估直肠癌新辅助放化疗后的反应:一篇叙述性文献综述。
背景:随着不同的新辅助治疗策略和器官保存策略的出现,直肠癌的治疗正在不断发展。相当比例的患者在新辅助治疗后可以达到完全临床缓解,这通常转化为病理完全缓解(pCR),在治疗目的手术后对手术标本进行评估。内镜检查在评估新辅助治疗的治疗反应中起着重要作用。目的:探讨内镜在预测直肠癌患者新辅助治疗后后续pCR中的作用。方法:进行了广泛的文献综述,以确定用于评估内镜反应的标准及其预测pCR的能力。结果:通过文献综述共筛选出15项研究。最常用的内镜评估标准包括有无扁平白色疤痕和无结节性或毛细血管扩张。与新辅助治疗方案相关的内镜评估时间的信息也从研究中提取出来。在大多数研究中,预测pCR的诊断准确率超过0.8。确定的主要限制是纳入研究的回顾性设计和中等偏倚风险。结论:内窥镜检查可以作为预测pCR对直肠癌新辅助治疗的关键预后因素,尽管目前可用的数据有很大的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
585
期刊介绍: The WJCO is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJCO is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of oncology. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJCO is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJCO are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in oncology. Scope: Art of Oncology, Biology of Neoplasia, Breast Cancer, Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer-Related Complications, Diagnosis in Oncology, Gastrointestinal Cancer, Genetic Testing For Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer, Hematologic Malignancy, Lung Cancer, Melanoma, Molecular Oncology, Neurooncology, Palliative and Supportive Care, Pediatric Oncology, Surgical Oncology, Translational Oncology, and Urologic Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书